Gahan M E, Bowman S, Chevalier R, Rossi R, Nelson M, Roffey P, Xu B, Power D, McNevin D
National Centre for Forensic Studies, University of Canberra, Bruce, ACT, 2617, Australia.
National Centre for Forensic Studies, University of Canberra, Bruce, ACT, 2617, Australia.
Forensic Sci Int. 2019 Feb;295:169-178. doi: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2018.12.011. Epub 2018 Dec 21.
Anthrax, caused by the Gram-positive, spore forming bacterium Bacillus anthracis, is a disease with naturally occurring outbreaks in many parts of the world, primarily in domestic and wild herbivores. Due to the movement of people and stock, B. anthracis could, however, be at transportation hubs including airports. The continuous threat to national and international security from a biological agent release, or hoax attack, is a very real concern. Sensitive, robust and rapid (hours-day) methods to identify biological agents, including B. anthracis, and distinguish pathogenic from non-pathogenic species, is an essential cornerstone to national security. The aim of this project was to determine the presence of Bacillus species at the Canberra Airport using two massively parallel sequencing (MPS) approaches and compare with previous results using real-time polymerase chain reaction (qPCR). Samples were collected daily for seven days each month from August 2011-July 2012 targeting movement of people, luggage and freight into and out of the Canberra Airport. Extracted DNA was analysed using qPCR specific for B. anthracis. A subset of samples was analysed using two MPS approaches. Approach one, using the Ion PGM™ (Thermo Fisher Scientific; TFS) and an in-house assay, targeted the two B. anthracis virulence plasmids (cya and capB genes) and a single conserved region of the 16S rRNA gene. Approach two, using the Ion S5™ (TFS) and the commercial Ion 16S™ Metagenomics Kit (TFS), targeted multiple regions within the bacterial 16S rRNA gene. Overall there was consistency between the two MPS approaches and between MPS and qPCR, however, MPS was more sensitive, particularly for plasmid detection. Whilst the broad-range 16S genomic target(s) used in both MPS approaches in this study was able to generate a metagenomic fingerprint of the bacterial community at the Canberra Airport, it could not resolve Bacillus species beyond the level of the Bacillus cereus group. The inclusion of B. anthracis virulence plasmid targets in the in-house assay did allow for the potential presumptive identifications of pathogenic species. No plasmid targets were in the Ion 16S™ Metagenomics Kit. This study shows the choice of target(s) is key in MPS assay development and should be carefully considered to ensure the assay is fit for purpose, whether as an initial screening (presumptive) or a more specific (but not entirely confirmatory) test. Identification approaches may also benefit from a combination of MPS and qPCR as each has benefits and limitations.
炭疽病由革兰氏阳性、形成芽孢的炭疽杆菌引起,是一种在世界许多地区自然爆发的疾病,主要发生在家畜和野生动物身上。然而,由于人员和牲畜的流动,炭疽杆菌可能存在于包括机场在内的交通枢纽。生物制剂释放或恶作剧攻击对国家安全构成的持续威胁是一个非常现实的问题。用于识别包括炭疽杆菌在内的生物制剂,并区分致病物种和非致病物种的灵敏、可靠且快速(数小时至数天)的方法,是国家安全的重要基石。本项目的目的是使用两种大规模平行测序(MPS)方法确定堪培拉机场是否存在芽孢杆菌属物种,并与之前使用实时聚合酶链反应(qPCR)的结果进行比较。从2011年8月至2012年7月,每月每天采集样本,为期七天,目标是进出堪培拉机场的人员、行李和货物。提取的DNA使用针对炭疽杆菌的qPCR进行分析。一部分样本使用两种MPS方法进行分析。方法一,使用Ion PGM™(赛默飞世尔科技公司;TFS)和一种内部检测方法,靶向炭疽杆菌的两个毒力质粒(cya和capB基因)以及16S rRNA基因的一个单一保守区域。方法二,使用Ion S5™(TFS)和商业Ion 16S™宏基因组学试剂盒(TFS),靶向细菌16S rRNA基因内的多个区域。总体而言,两种MPS方法之间以及MPS和qPCR之间存在一致性,然而,MPS更灵敏,尤其是在质粒检测方面。虽然本研究中两种MPS方法使用的广泛的16S基因组靶点能够生成堪培拉机场细菌群落的宏基因组指纹,但它无法在蜡样芽孢杆菌组水平之外分辨芽孢杆菌属物种。在内部检测方法中纳入炭疽杆菌毒力质粒靶点确实允许对致病物种进行潜在的推定鉴定。Ion 16S™宏基因组学试剂盒中没有质粒靶点。本研究表明,靶点的选择是MPS检测方法开发的关键,应仔细考虑以确保检测方法适合目的,无论是作为初步筛查(推定)还是更特异(但并非完全确证)的检测。鉴定方法也可能受益于MPS和qPCR的结合,因为每种方法都有其优点和局限性。