Department of Animal Science, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln 68583.
Department of Biological Science, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln 68583.
J Dairy Sci. 2019 Mar;102(3):2085-2093. doi: 10.3168/jds.2018-14608. Epub 2019 Jan 3.
Although the inclusion of fat has reduced methane production in ruminants, relatively little research has been conducted comparing the effects of source and profile of fatty acids on methane production in lactating dairy cows. A study using 8 multiparous (325 ± 17 DIM; mean ± SD) lactating Jersey cows was conducted to determine effects of feeding canola meal and lard versus extruded byproduct containing flaxseed as a high-C18:3 fat source on methane production and diet digestibility in late-lactation dairy cows. A crossover design with 32-d periods (28-d adaptation and 4-d collections) was used to compare 2 different fat sources. Diets contained approximately 50% forage mixture of corn silage, alfalfa hay, and brome hay; the concentrate mixture changed between diets to include either (1) a conventional diet of corn, soybean meal, and canola meal with lard (control) or (2) a conventional diet of corn and soybean meal with an extruded byproduct containing flaxseed (EXF) as the fat source. Diets were balanced to decrease corn, lard, and canola meal and replace them with soybean mean and EXF to increase the concentration of C18:3 (0.14 vs. 1.20% of DM). Methane production was measured using headbox-style indirect calorimeters. Cattle were restricted to 95% ad libitum feed intake during collections. Milk production (17.4 ± 1.04 kg/d) and dry matter intake (15.4 ± 0.71 kg/d) were similar among treatments. Milk fat (5.88 ± 0.25%) and protein (4.08 ± 0.14%) were not affected by treatment. For methane production, no difference was observed for total production (352.0 vs. 349.8 ± 16.43 L/d for control vs. EXF, respectively). Methane production per unit of dry matter intake was not affected and averaged 23.1 ± 0.57 L/kg. Similarly, methane production per unit of energy-corrected milk was not affected by fat source and averaged 15.5 ± 0.68 L/kg. Heat production was similar, averaging 21.1 ± 1.02 Mcal/d. Digestibility of organic matter, neutral detergent fiber, and crude protein was not affected by diet and averaged 69.9, 53.6, and 73.3%, respectively. Results indicated that increasing C18:3 may not affect methane production or digestibility of the diet in lactating dairy cows.
虽然在反刍动物中添加脂肪可以减少甲烷的产生,但对于比较不同脂肪酸的来源和组成对泌乳奶牛甲烷产生的影响的研究相对较少。一项使用 8 头经产(325±17DIM;均值±SD)泽西奶牛的研究旨在确定用菜籽油和猪油喂养与用富含亚麻籽油的膨化副产品作为高 C18:3 脂肪来源相比,对泌乳后期奶牛甲烷产生和日粮消化率的影响。采用 32 天(28 天适应和 4 天收集)的交叉设计比较了 2 种不同的脂肪来源。日粮含有约 50%的青贮玉米、苜蓿干草和雀麦干草的饲草混合物;日粮中的精料混合物在不同日粮中变化,包括(1)以玉米、豆粕和菜籽油加猪油为常规日粮(对照),或(2)以玉米和豆粕为常规日粮,以富含亚麻籽油的膨化副产品(EXF)作为脂肪来源。日粮平衡以减少玉米、猪油和菜籽油的用量,并以豆粕和 EXF 代替,以增加 C18:3 的浓度(DM 的 0.14%对 1.20%)。使用顶盒式间接测热仪测量甲烷的产生。在收集期间,牛的采食量限制在 95%的自由采食量。产奶量(17.4±1.04kg/d)和干物质采食量(15.4±0.71kg/d)在处理间无差异。乳脂(5.88±0.25%)和蛋白质(4.08±0.14%)不受处理影响。对于甲烷的产生,对照和 EXF 组的总产生量(分别为 352.0 和 349.8±16.43L/d)没有差异。单位干物质采食量的甲烷产生量不受影响,平均为 23.1±0.57L/kg。同样,单位校正乳能的甲烷产生量不受脂肪源的影响,平均为 15.5±0.68L/kg。产热量相似,平均为 21.1±1.02Mcal/d。干物质、中性洗涤纤维和粗蛋白的消化率不受日粮影响,分别为 69.9%、53.6%和 73.3%。结果表明,增加 C18:3 可能不会影响泌乳奶牛的甲烷产生或日粮消化率。