Aksel Hacer, Arslan Elifcan, Puralı Nuhan, Uyanık Özgür, Nagaş Emre
Department of Endodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey.
Department of Biophysics, Faculty of Medicine, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey.
Microsc Res Tech. 2019 May;82(5):624-629. doi: 10.1002/jemt.23209. Epub 2019 Jan 5.
This study investigated the dentinal tubule penetration of mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA), NeoMTA Plus and Biodentine placed by either manual condensation or ultrasonic activation in simulated open apex model. Standardized divergent open apex models were created using palatal roots of 60 human maxillary molars and divided into six groups according to the used cements and activation methods (n = 10): MTA-manual condensation, MTA-ultrasonic activation, NeoMTA Plus-manual condensation, NeoMTA Plus-ultrasonic activation, Biodentine-manual condensation, Biodentine-ultrasonic activation. For the measurement of penetration, the cements were mixed with 0.1% Rhodamin B and 6-mm apical portions of each root canal were obturated in an orthograde direction. The roots were embedded into acrylic blocks, and 1-mm-thick sections were obtained at 3 mm from the apex. Specimens were mounted onto glass slides and scanned under a confocal laser scanning microscope (CLSM) and stereomicroscope. Dentinal tubule penetration areas, depth and percentage were measured using LSM and ImageJ software. The data were analyzed using two-way analysis of variance (anova) with Bonferroni correction (α = 0.05). No correlation was found between stereomicroscope and CLSM analyses (p > .05). CLSM analysis showed no significant differences between MTA, NeoMTA Plus, and Biodentine groups when manual condensation was used (p > .05). Ultrasonic activation did not increase the tubular penetration of MTA, NeoMTA Plus or Biodentine as compared to manual condensation of each material (p > .05). MTA, NeoMTA Plus and Biodentine showed similar tubular penetration when manual condensation was used. Ultrasonic activation of these cements had no effect on tubular penetration of each material as compared to the manual condensation counterparts.
本研究调查了在模拟开放根尖模型中,通过手动加压或超声激活放置的三氧化矿物凝聚体(MTA)、NeoMTA Plus和生物陶瓷在牙本质小管中的渗透情况。使用60颗人类上颌磨牙的腭根创建标准化的发散型开放根尖模型,并根据所用的粘结剂和激活方法分为六组(n = 10):MTA-手动加压、MTA-超声激活、NeoMTA Plus-手动加压、NeoMTA Plus-超声激活、生物陶瓷-手动加压、生物陶瓷-超声激活。为了测量渗透情况,将粘结剂与0.1%的罗丹明B混合,并沿顺行方向封闭每个根管的6毫米根尖部分。将牙根嵌入丙烯酸块中,并在距根尖3毫米处获得1毫米厚的切片。将标本安装在载玻片上,在共聚焦激光扫描显微镜(CLSM)和体视显微镜下进行扫描。使用LSM和ImageJ软件测量牙本质小管渗透面积、深度和百分比。使用双向方差分析(anova)并进行Bonferroni校正(α = 0.05)对数据进行分析。在体视显微镜和CLSM分析之间未发现相关性(p > 0.05)。CLSM分析显示,当使用手动加压时,MTA、NeoMTA Plus和生物陶瓷组之间没有显著差异(p > 0.05)。与每种材料的手动加压相比,超声激活并未增加MTA、NeoMTA Plus或生物陶瓷的小管渗透(p > 0.05)。当使用手动加压时,MTA、NeoMTA Plus和生物陶瓷显示出相似的小管渗透情况。与手动加压的对应物相比,这些粘结剂的超声激活对每种材料的小管渗透没有影响。