• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于环氧树脂和生物陶瓷的根管封闭剂的牙本质小管渗透能力。

Dentinal tubular penetration ability of epoxy resin-based and bioceramic-based root canal sealers.

作者信息

Saricam Esma, Altinişik Hanife

机构信息

Department of Endodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Ankara Yildirim Beyazit University, Ayvali Mah. 150. Sk. Etlik, Ankara, Turkey.

Department of Restorative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Gazi University, Ankara, Turkey.

出版信息

BMC Oral Health. 2024 Dec 19;24(1):1506. doi: 10.1186/s12903-024-05311-5.

DOI:10.1186/s12903-024-05311-5
PMID:39702161
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11660547/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to compare AH Plus Bioceramic Sealer (AHPB), AH Plus (AHP), MTA Fillapex (MTAF), and Sure-Seal (SS) sealers for dentinal tubular penetration ability.

METHODS

Forty extracted human mandibular premolars were instrumented and divided into 4 groups based on the sealer used for filling (n = 10): AHPB, AHP, MTAF, SS. After filling the root canals, the roots were entombed in acrylic resin blocks and cut vertically in the long axis to obtain 1-mm-thick disks from 3 mm (at apical third), 8 mm (at middle third) and 13 mm (at coronal third) away the apical foramen. The images of 120 samples (30 for each group) were scanned by using confocal laser scanning microscopy and analyzed with the ImageJ software. Total penetration area and the root canal area were measured, and the ratio of these values were recorded as sealer penetration ratio. The data were evaluated for each third and in total using one-way ANOVA with post-hoc Tukey's test. The significance level was set to P < 0.05.

RESULTS

In the apical, middle and coronal thirds and in total, MTAF and AHP, and SS and AHPB had statistically significant identical penetration ratio values. Both SS and AHPB demonstrated statistically considerably greater penetration % as compared to MTAF and AHP in all thirds (P < 0.05), and in total (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

AHPB and SS provided a higher penetration % than AHP and MTAF in apical, middle and coronal thirds, and in total.

摘要

背景

本研究的目的是比较AH Plus生物陶瓷封闭剂(AHPB)、AH Plus封闭剂(AHP)、MTA Fillapex封闭剂(MTAF)和Sure-Seal封闭剂(SS)的牙本质小管渗透能力。

方法

选取40颗拔除的人下颌前磨牙进行根管预备,并根据用于充填的封闭剂分为4组(n = 10):AHPB组、AHP组、MTAF组、SS组。根管充填后,将牙根包埋在丙烯酸树脂块中,沿长轴垂直切割,从距根尖孔3 mm(根尖三分之一处)、8 mm(根中三分之一处)和13 mm(根冠三分之一处)获取1 mm厚的切片。使用共聚焦激光扫描显微镜对120个样本(每组30个)的图像进行扫描,并使用ImageJ软件进行分析。测量总渗透面积和根管面积,将这些值的比值记录为封闭剂渗透比。使用单因素方差分析和事后Tukey检验对每个三分之一部分和总体数据进行评估。显著性水平设定为P < 0.05。

结果

在根尖、根中、根冠三分之一部分及总体上,MTAF与AHP、SS与AHPB的渗透比值具有统计学意义上的相同性。在所有三分之一部分及总体上,SS和AHPB的渗透百分比均显著高于MTAF和AHP(P < 0.05)。

结论

在根尖、根中、根冠三分之一部分及总体上,AHPB和SS的渗透百分比高于AHP和MTAF。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/650e/11660547/0385634fb851/12903_2024_5311_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/650e/11660547/bfb9bb1df6cc/12903_2024_5311_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/650e/11660547/0385634fb851/12903_2024_5311_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/650e/11660547/bfb9bb1df6cc/12903_2024_5311_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/650e/11660547/0385634fb851/12903_2024_5311_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Dentinal tubular penetration ability of epoxy resin-based and bioceramic-based root canal sealers.基于环氧树脂和生物陶瓷的根管封闭剂的牙本质小管渗透能力。
BMC Oral Health. 2024 Dec 19;24(1):1506. doi: 10.1186/s12903-024-05311-5.
2
The Effect of Primary Root Canal Treatment on Dentinal Tubule Penetration of Calcium Silicate-based Sealers during Endodontic Retreatment.根管再治疗期间一次根管治疗对硅酸钙类封闭剂牙本质小管渗透的影响
J Endod. 2022 Sep;48(9):1169-1177. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2022.05.008. Epub 2022 Jun 3.
3
Evaluation of interfacial adaptation and penetration of bioceramic-based sealers in oval root canals: A confocal laser scanning microscope study.评价基于生物陶瓷的封闭剂在椭圆形根管中的界面适应性和渗透性:激光共聚焦扫描显微镜研究。
Microsc Res Tech. 2023 Jul;86(7):754-761. doi: 10.1002/jemt.24323. Epub 2023 Apr 20.
4
Dentinal tubule penetration of AH Plus, iRoot SP, MTA fillapex, and guttaflow bioseal root canal sealers after different final irrigation procedures: A confocal microscopic study.不同最终冲洗程序后AH Plus、iRoot SP、MTA fillapex和guttaflow生物封闭根管封闭剂对牙本质小管的渗透:一项共聚焦显微镜研究。
Lasers Surg Med. 2016 Jan;48(1):70-6. doi: 10.1002/lsm.22446. Epub 2016 Jan 12.
5
Bioactivity and Element Composition of Three Endodontic Root Canal Sealers.三种根管封闭剂的生物活性及元素组成
J Contemp Dent Pract. 2025 Jan 1;26(1):62-70. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-3791.
6
Effect of photodynamic therapy and non-thermal plasma on root canal filling: analysis of adhesion and sealer penetration.光动力疗法和非热等离子体对根管充填的影响:粘结及封闭剂渗透分析
J Appl Oral Sci. 2017 Jul-Aug;25(4):396-403. doi: 10.1590/1678-7757-2016-0498.
7
Root canal cleanliness and debris extrusion following retreatment of thermoplastic injection technique and bioceramic-based root canal sealer.热塑注射技术和基于生物陶瓷的根管封闭剂再治疗后的根管清洁度和碎屑挤出。
Clin Oral Investig. 2024 Oct 23;28(11):608. doi: 10.1007/s00784-024-06005-6.
8
Interfacial adaptation and thickness of bioceramic-based root canal sealers.基于生物陶瓷的根管封闭剂的界面适应性和厚度
Dent Mater J. 2015;34(4):516-21. doi: 10.4012/dmj.2015-049.
9
A confocal laser scanning microscopic evaluation of nonthermal atmospheric plasma on the dentinal tubule penetration of bioceramic and epoxy resin-based root canal sealers.非热大气等离子体对生物陶瓷和环氧树脂基根管封闭剂牙本质小管渗透作用的共聚焦激光扫描显微镜评估
J Conserv Dent. 2023 May-Jun;26(3):265-270. doi: 10.4103/jcd.jcd_22_23. Epub 2023 May 16.
10
Sealer penetration into dentinal tubules in the presence or absence of smear layer: a confocal laser scanning microscopic study.存在或不存在玷污层时封闭剂渗入牙本质小管的共聚焦激光扫描显微镜研究
J Endod. 2014 Oct;40(10):1627-31. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2014.03.019. Epub 2014 May 10.

本文引用的文献

1
Comparative evaluation of the quality and homogeneity of different obturating systems using cone-beam computed tomography - An study.使用锥形束计算机断层扫描对不同充填系统的质量和均匀性进行比较评估——一项研究。
J Conserv Dent Endod. 2023 Jul-Aug;26(4):414-419. doi: 10.4103/jcd.jcd_229_23. Epub 2023 Jul 28.
2
Dentinal Tubule Penetrability and Bond Strength of Two Novel Calcium Silicate-Based Root Canal Sealers.两种新型硅酸钙基根管封闭剂的牙本质小管渗透性和粘结强度
Materials (Basel). 2023 Apr 23;16(9):3309. doi: 10.3390/ma16093309.
3
Effect of different final irrigation agitation techniques on root canal dentin tubule penetration of nanoparticle calcium hydroxide dressing.
不同最终冲洗搅拌技术对纳米颗粒氢氧化钙糊剂根管牙本质小管渗透的影响
Aust Endod J. 2023 Sep;49 Suppl 1:447-454. doi: 10.1111/aej.12765. Epub 2023 May 5.
4
Efficacy of various activation techniques on tubule penetration of resin-based and bioceramic root canal sealers: An in vitro confocal microscopy study.不同激活技术对树脂类和生物陶瓷类根管封闭剂小管渗透的影响:一项体外共聚焦显微镜研究
Aust Endod J. 2023 Sep;49 Suppl 1:381-389. doi: 10.1111/aej.12754. Epub 2023 Mar 27.
5
Efficacy of different irrigation agitation systems in the removal of root canal sealers from artificial standardised grooves.不同冲洗搅拌系统去除人工标准化沟槽根管封闭剂的效果。
Aust Endod J. 2023 Sep;49 Suppl 1:339-344. doi: 10.1111/aej.12741. Epub 2023 Feb 22.
6
Comparison of push-out bond strength of endodontic sealers after root canal drying with different techniques.不同根管干燥技术对牙胶密封剂后推出力影响的比较。
Clin Exp Dent Res. 2023 Apr;9(2):314-321. doi: 10.1002/cre2.720. Epub 2023 Feb 19.
7
The Effects of Different Agitation Techniques of Canal Irrigant on Tubular Penetration of a Bioceramic Sealer.根管冲洗液不同搅拌技术对生物陶瓷封闭剂根管渗透的影响
Iran Endod J. 2019 Fall;14(4):289-295. doi: 10.22037/iej.v14i4.25548.
8
Single Cone Obturation versus Cold Lateral Compaction Techniques with Bioceramic and Resin Sealers: Quality of Obturation and Push-Out Bond Strength.单锥充填与使用生物陶瓷和树脂封闭剂的冷侧向加压充填技术:充填质量和推出粘结强度
Int J Dent. 2023 Jan 17;2023:3427151. doi: 10.1155/2023/3427151. eCollection 2023.
9
Effect of the Modified Methacrylate-Based Root Canal Sealer in Single-Cone Technique.改良甲基丙烯酸酯类根管封闭剂在单锥技术中的效果
Nanomaterials (Basel). 2022 Oct 23;12(21):3722. doi: 10.3390/nano12213722.
10
Physicochemical and Biological Properties of AH Plus Bioceramic.AH Plus 生物陶瓷的理化及生物学性能。
J Endod. 2023 Jan;49(1):69-76. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2022.10.009. Epub 2022 Oct 21.