Department of Biomedical Sciences & Veterinary Public Health, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Box 7036, SE-750 07 Uppsala, Sweden.
Department of Architecture and Civil Engineering, Chalmers University of Technology, SE-412 96 Gothenburg, Sweden.
Animal. 2019 Sep;13(9):2052-2059. doi: 10.1017/S1751731118003415. Epub 2019 Jan 7.
Wastewater discharge and agricultural activities may pose microbial risks to natural water sources. The impact of different sources can be assessed by water quality modelling. The aim of this study was to use hydrological and hydrodynamic models to illustrate the risk of exposing grazing animals to faecal pollutants in natural water sources, using three zoonotic faecal pathogens as model microbes and fictitious pastures in Sweden as examples. Microbial contamination by manure from fertilisation and grazing was modelled by use of a hydrological model (HYPE) and a hydrodynamic model (MIKE 3 FM), and microbial contamination from human wastewater was modelled by application of both models in a backwards process. The faecal pathogens Salmonella spp., verotoxin-producing Escherichia coli O157:H7 (VTEC) and Cryptosporidium parvum were chosen as model organisms. The pathogen loads on arable land and pastures were estimated based on pathogen concentration in cattle faeces, herd prevalence and within-herd prevalence. Contamination from human wastewater discharge was simulated by estimating the number of pathogens required from a fictitious wastewater discharge to reach a concentration high enough to cause infection in cattle using the points on the fictitious pastures as their primary source of drinking water. In the scenarios for pathogens from animal sources, none of the simulated concentrations of salmonella exceeded the concentrations needed to infect adult cattle. For VTEC, most of the simulated concentrations exceeded the concentration needed to infect calves. For C. parvum, all the simulated concentrations exceeded the concentration needed to infect calves. The pathogen loads needed at the release points for human wastewater to achieve infectious doses for cattle were mostly above the potential loads of salmonella and VTEC estimated to be present in a 24-h overflow from a medium-size Swedish wastewater treatment plant, while the required pathogen loads of C. parvum at the release points were below the potential loads of C. parvum in a 24-h wastewater overflow. Most estimates in this study assume a worst-case scenario. Controlling zoonotic infections at herd level prevents environmental contamination and subsequent human exposure. The potential for infection of grazing animals with faecal pathogens has implications for keeping animals on pastures with access to natural water sources. As the infectious dose for most pathogens is more easily reached for calves than for adult animals, and young calves are also the main shedders of C. parvum, keeping young calves on pastures adjacent to natural water sources is best avoided.
污水排放和农业活动可能会对自然水源造成微生物风险。水质模型可用于评估不同来源的影响。本研究旨在使用水文和水动力模型来说明将放牧动物暴露于自然水源中粪便污染物的风险,使用三种人畜共患病粪便病原体作为模型微生物,并以瑞典的虚构牧场为例。通过使用水文模型(HYPE)和水动力模型(MIKE 3 FM)对施肥和放牧的粪便进行微生物污染建模,以及通过在反向过程中应用这两个模型对人类废水的微生物污染进行建模。选择沙门氏菌、产肠毒素性大肠杆菌 O157:H7 (VTEC) 和微小隐孢子虫作为模型生物。根据牛粪便中的病原体浓度、畜群流行率和畜群内流行率,估计了耕地和牧场上的病原体负荷。通过估计从虚构污水排放中所需的病原体数量来模拟人类污水排放的污染,假设虚构牧场的点是牛的主要饮用水源,当污水排放中的病原体浓度达到足以感染牛的水平时,就会发生这种情况。在动物源病原体的情况下,模拟的沙门氏菌浓度均未超过感染成年牛所需的浓度。对于 VTEC,模拟的大多数浓度都超过了感染小牛所需的浓度。对于微小隐孢子虫,所有模拟的浓度都超过了感染小牛所需的浓度。为了使人类污水达到对牛的感染剂量,在释放点所需的病原体负荷量大多高于从瑞典中等规模的污水处理厂 24 小时溢流中估计的沙门氏菌和 VTEC 的潜在负荷量,而在释放点所需的微小隐孢子虫的病原体负荷量低于 24 小时污水溢流中的微小隐孢子虫的潜在负荷量。本研究中的大多数估计都假设了最坏情况。在畜群水平上控制人畜共患病感染可防止环境污染和随后的人类暴露。放牧动物感染粪便病原体的可能性对让动物在可接触自然水源的牧场上放牧有影响。由于大多数病原体的感染剂量对小牛比成年动物更容易达到,并且年幼的小牛也是微小隐孢子虫的主要脱落物,因此最好避免让年幼的小牛在靠近自然水源的牧场上放牧。