National Institute of Occupational Health, PO Box 8149 Dep., 0033 Oslo, Norway.
Scand J Work Environ Health. 2019 May 1;45(3):239-247. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.3774. Epub 2018 Nov 13.
Objectives The aim of this study was to (i) construct and evaluate a gender-specific job exposure matrix (JEM) for mechanical and psychosocial work exposures and (ii) test its predictive validity for low-back pain. Methods We utilized data from the Norwegian nationwide Survey of Living Conditions on work environment in 2006 and 2009. We classified occupations on a 4-digit level based on the Norwegian version of the International Standard Classification of Occupations (ISCO-88). The mechanical and psychosocial exposure information was collected by personal telephone interviews and included exposures that were known risk factors for low-back pain. We evaluated the agreement between the individual- and JEM-based exposure estimates, with kappa, sensitivity and specificity measures. We assessed the JEM`s predictive validity by testing the associations between low-back pain and the individual- and JEM-based exposure. Results The results showed an overall fair-to-moderate agreement between the constructed JEM and individual work exposures. The JEM performed considerably better for mechanical work exposures compared with psychosocial work exposures. The predictive validity of the mechanical and psychosocial JEM showed a consistently lower but predominantly reproducible association with low-back pain for both genders. Conclusions The mechanical estimates and psychosocial stressors, such as psychological demands, monotonous work and decision latitude in the constructed JEM, may be useful in large epidemiological register studies. The predictive validity of the matrix was evaluated as being overall acceptable, it can thus be an effective and versatile approach to estimate the relationship between work exposures and low-back pain.
目的 本研究旨在:(i)构建和评估针对机械和心理社会工作暴露的性别特异性工作暴露矩阵(JEM);(ii)测试其对腰痛的预测有效性。
方法 我们利用了 2006 年和 2009 年挪威全国生活条件调查中有关工作环境的数据。我们根据挪威版国际标准职业分类(ISCO-88)对职业进行了 4 位数分类。机械和心理社会暴露信息通过个人电话访谈收集,包括已知是腰痛风险因素的暴露。我们通过测试腰痛与个体和 JEM 暴露之间的关联来评估个体和 JEM 暴露估计值之间的一致性,使用kappa、敏感性和特异性测量值。
结果 结果表明,构建的 JEM 与个体工作暴露之间存在总体上适度到良好的一致性。与心理社会工作暴露相比,JEM 对机械工作暴露的预测效果要好得多。机械和心理社会 JEM 的预测有效性表明,两者对于两性腰痛的关联均较低,但具有一致性和可重复性。
结论 构建的 JEM 中的机械估计值和心理社会压力源,如心理需求、单调工作和决策自由度,对于大型流行病学登记研究可能有用。矩阵的预测有效性被评估为总体上可接受,因此它是一种有效且多功能的方法,可以估计工作暴露与腰痛之间的关系。