Zaid Waleed Y, Alshehry Sami, Zakhary George, Yampolsky Andrew, Kim Beomjune
Assistant Professor, Louisiana State University, New Orleans; Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Department, Louisiana State University School of Dentistry, New Orleans; Director, Baton Rouge OMFS, Baton Rouge; Co-Director, Head and Neck and Microvascular Reconstruction Fellowship, LSU-Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Faculty Practice, Baton Rouge; Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, LSUHSC School of Dentistry, New Orleans, LA.
Resident, OMFS Program, Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Department, Louisiana State University School of Dentistry, New Orleans; Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, LSUHSC School of Dentistry, New Orleans, LA.
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2019 Jun;77(6):1316.e1-1316.e12. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2018.12.003. Epub 2018 Dec 12.
Functional reconstruction of the temporomandibular joint (TMJ) is a controversial topic among oral and maxillofacial surgeons; this controversy becomes more complicated when one dives into the dilemma of the ideal reconstructive modality. TMJ defects might result from various etiologies, such as blunt or penetrating traumatic injuries, advanced degenerative joint disease, or various pathologic conditions, including benign and malignant conditions, that might arise from the TMJ or adjacent tissues. Reconstruction of the TMJ is vital because of its essential function in mastication, articulation, speech, and facial esthetics and symmetry. In the pediatric population, the TMJ acts as a growth center. TMJ reconstructive surgery might be influenced by various factors that can steer the surgeon toward adopting a specific reconstructive modality. These factors can be classified into preoperative factors that include the overall general health of the patient, expectations, and socioeconomic status that might be an obstacle in using custom-made solutions. The surgeon's experience, level of comfort, and training are crucial influencing factors. TMJ reconstructive options consist of autogenous grafts or alloplastic options. Autogenous grafts encompass 2 broad subcategories. The first is the vascularized option, and a good example is the vascularized fibula free flap. The second subcategory includes nonvascularized grafts, such as costochondral grafts and sternoclavicular grafts. Alloplastic grafts include various TMJ stock joints or custom-made patient-specific prostheses and stock condylar prostheses. The goals of TMJ reconstruction are to establish a pain-free normal range of mouth opening, stable occlusion, and absence of facial deformity. Complication rates in TMJ surgery are low and include surgical infection, nerve injury, failure or fracture of the prosthesis, or injury to adjacent structures. This report presents a case of a stock condylar prosthesis displaced into the middle cranial fossa, which was managed with a 2-stage approach of removing the displaced prosthesis and then reconstruction with a fibula vascularized free flap and a simultaneous contralateral sagittal split osteotomy.
颞下颌关节(TMJ)的功能重建在口腔颌面外科医生中是一个有争议的话题;当深入探讨理想重建方式的困境时,这种争议变得更加复杂。TMJ缺损可能由多种病因引起,如钝性或穿透性创伤、晚期退行性关节疾病,或各种病理状况,包括可能源于TMJ或相邻组织的良性和恶性疾病。TMJ的重建至关重要,因为它在咀嚼、关节活动、言语以及面部美学和对称性方面具有重要功能。在儿童群体中,TMJ起着生长中心的作用。TMJ重建手术可能受到多种因素的影响,这些因素会促使外科医生采用特定的重建方式。这些因素可分为术前因素,包括患者的整体健康状况、期望以及社会经济地位,而社会经济地位可能成为使用定制解决方案的障碍。外科医生的经验、舒适度和培训是关键的影响因素。TMJ重建选择包括自体移植或异体植入选项。自体移植包括2个广泛的子类别。第一个是带血管蒂选项,一个很好的例子是带血管蒂游离腓骨瓣。第二个子类别包括非带血管蒂移植,如肋软骨移植和胸锁关节移植。异体植入物包括各种TMJ成品关节或定制的患者特异性假体以及成品髁突假体。TMJ重建的目标是建立无痛的正常开口范围、稳定的咬合以及无面部畸形。TMJ手术的并发症发生率较低,包括手术感染、神经损伤、假体失败或骨折,或对相邻结构的损伤。本报告介绍了一例成品髁突假体移位至中颅窝的病例,该病例采用了两阶段方法进行处理,即先取出移位的假体,然后用带血管蒂游离腓骨瓣进行重建,并同时进行对侧矢状劈开截骨术。