• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

站立位与仰卧位之间身体位置双侧对称性的差异,以及注意力和意识对姿势对称性的影响。

Differences in body positional bilateral symmetry between stance and supine positions, and the impact of attention and awareness on postural symmetry.

作者信息

Siegler Alon, Pick Chaim G, Been Ella

机构信息

Department of Anatomy and Anthropology, Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Israel.

Department of Anatomy and Anthropology, Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Israel; The Dr. Miriam and Sheldon G. Adelson Chair and Center for the Biology of Addictive Diseases, and Sagol School of Neuroscience, Tel Aviv University, Israel.

出版信息

Gait Posture. 2019 Feb;68:476-482. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2018.12.042. Epub 2019 Jan 2.

DOI:10.1016/j.gaitpost.2018.12.042
PMID:30616176
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Postural asymmetries may cause structural pathological conditions and impaired movement pattern. The influence of body position and awareness towards symmetry has not yet been elucidated. The aim of this study was twofold: First, to compare the body positional bilateral symmetry between standing and supine positions, and second, to examine whether the awareness to symmetry can modify posture perception and body positional bilateral symmetry.

METHODS

We analyzed the degree of anterior postural alignment symmetry of 34 healthy subjects by photogrammetric method (three photographs in a standing position and three in a supine position). Each photo captured different state of awareness: Subjective Comfortable Posture (SCP), Subjective Perceived Symmetrical Posture (SPSP), and Guided Posture Protocol (GPP).

RESULTS

The standing position increased the symmetrical alignment of the neck (p < 0.013) and the upper limbs (p < 0.011). However, the supine position demonstrated increased symmetrical alignment of the upper trunk (p < 0.019) and the feet (p < 0.002). In the standing position, GPP showed greater symmetry of the neck (p < 0.022), the shoulders (p < 0.014), the thorax midline (p < 0.009), the upper trunk (p < 0.000) and the upper limbs (p < 0.029). No significant changes were observed in the supine position between the three states of awareness.

CONCLUSIONS

Study results indicate that the supine position shows greater degree of upper trunk's symmetrical alignment than the standing position. It also indicates that while standing, focusing attention into symmetry improves body positional bilateral symmetry. These results might have clinical implications when working with patients who suffer from asymmetric posture.

摘要

背景与目的

姿势不对称可能导致结构病理状况和运动模式受损。身体姿势和对对称性的认知的影响尚未阐明。本研究的目的有两个:第一,比较站立位和仰卧位时身体位置的双侧对称性;第二,研究对对称性的认知是否能改变姿势感知和身体位置的双侧对称性。

方法

我们通过摄影测量法分析了34名健康受试者的前位姿势对齐对称程度(站立位三张照片,仰卧位三张照片)。每张照片捕捉不同的认知状态:主观舒适姿势(SCP)、主观感知对称姿势(SPSP)和引导姿势方案(GPP)。

结果

站立位增加了颈部(p<0.013)和上肢(p<0.011)的对称对齐。然而,仰卧位显示上躯干(p<0.019)和足部(p<0.002)的对称对齐增加。在站立位,GPP显示颈部(p<0.022)、肩部(p<0.014)、胸中线(p<0.009)、上躯干(p<0.000)和上肢(p<0.029)的对称性更高。仰卧位在三种认知状态之间未观察到显著变化。

结论

研究结果表明,仰卧位上躯干的对称对齐程度高于站立位。这也表明,站立时,将注意力集中在对称性上可改善身体位置的双侧对称性。这些结果可能对治疗姿势不对称患者具有临床意义。

相似文献

1
Differences in body positional bilateral symmetry between stance and supine positions, and the impact of attention and awareness on postural symmetry.站立位与仰卧位之间身体位置双侧对称性的差异,以及注意力和意识对姿势对称性的影响。
Gait Posture. 2019 Feb;68:476-482. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2018.12.042. Epub 2019 Jan 2.
2
Difference in whole spinal alignment between supine and standing positions in patients with adult spinal deformity using a new comparison method with slot-scanning three-dimensional X-ray imager and computed tomography through digital reconstructed radiography.采用槽扫描三维X线成像仪和通过数字重建X线摄影的计算机断层扫描的新比较方法,对成人脊柱畸形患者仰卧位和站立位时的全脊柱排列差异进行研究。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2018 Dec 6;19(1):437. doi: 10.1186/s12891-018-2355-5.
3
Three-dimensional alignment changes of the shoulder girdle between the supine and standing positions.肩带在仰卧位和站立位之间的三维对位变化。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2020 Sep 15;15(1):411. doi: 10.1186/s13018-020-01934-w.
4
Postural changes of the dural sac in the lumbar spines of asymptomatic individuals using positional stand-up magnetic resonance imaging.使用站立位磁共振成像观察无症状个体腰椎硬脊膜囊的体位变化。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2007 Feb 15;32(4):E136-40. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000255202.94153.ca.
5
Differences in Lung and Lobe Volumes between Supine and Standing Positions Scanned with Conventional and Newly Developed 320-Detector-Row Upright CT: Intra-Individual Comparison.常规及新型 320 排直立 CT 扫描时仰卧位与立位肺及肺叶容积的差异:个体内比较。
Respiration. 2020;99(7):598-605. doi: 10.1159/000507265. Epub 2020 Jul 8.
6
Differences in lung attenuation gradients between supine and standing positions in healthy participants on conventional/supine and upright computed tomography.健康受试者在常规/仰卧位和直立位 CT 上的仰卧位和站立位时肺衰减梯度的差异。
Sci Rep. 2024 Sep 14;14(1):21493. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-72786-1.
7
Quantitative assessment of postural alignment in young adults based on photographs of anterior, posterior, and lateral views.基于前后位和侧位照片对年轻人姿势对齐情况进行定量评估。
J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2011 Jul-Aug;34(6):371-80. doi: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2011.05.018. Epub 2011 Jul 18.
8
How body position changes visual vertical perception after unilateral vestibular loss.单侧前庭丧失后身体姿势如何改变视觉垂直感知。
Neuropsychologia. 2008;46(9):2435-40. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2008.03.017. Epub 2008 Apr 8.
9
The association of kyphosis assessed in supine and standing positions with future activities of daily living dependence: the Kurabuchi Study.仰卧位和站立位后凸评估与未来日常生活活动依赖的关系:仓桥研究。
Arch Osteoporos. 2017 Nov 22;12(1):105. doi: 10.1007/s11657-017-0401-9.
10
Cerebrovascular reactivity and cerebral autoregulation are improved in the supine posture compared to upright in healthy men and women.与直立位相比,健康男性和女性在仰卧位时脑血管反应性和脑自动调节能力得到改善。
PLoS One. 2020 Mar 2;15(3):e0229049. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0229049. eCollection 2020.