Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery/Oral Pathology & 3D Innovation Lab, VU University Medical Centre/Academic Centre for Dentistry Amsterdam (ACTA), De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Department of Plastic, Reconstructive and Hand Surgery, VU University Medical Centre, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Oral Oncol. 2019 Jan;88:1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2018.11.013. Epub 2018 Nov 16.
Comparing accuracy results for mandibular reconstructions using computer-assisted surgery (CAS) is limited due to heterogeneity in image acquisition, extent of mandibular resection, and evaluation methodologies between studies. We propose a practical, feasible and reproducible guideline for standardizing evaluation methods to allow valid comparisons of postoperative results and facilitate meta-analyses in the future. It offers a guide to imaging, data comparison, volume assessment of 3-dimensional models, classification of defects, and it also contains a quantitative accuracy evaluation method.
由于研究之间在图像采集、下颌骨切除范围和评估方法方面存在异质性，因此使用计算机辅助手术（CAS）进行下颌骨重建的准确性结果比较受到限制。我们提出了一种实用、可行且可重复的指南，以标准化评估方法，从而能够对术后结果进行有效的比较，并为将来的荟萃分析提供便利。它提供了成像、数据比较、三维模型体积评估、缺陷分类的指南，并且还包含一种定量准确性评估方法。
