Sobell Department of Motor Neuroscience and Movement Disorders, UCL Institute of Neurology, London, UK.
Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Keio University School of Medicine, 35 Shinanomachi, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, 160-8582, Japan.
Dysphagia. 2019 Oct;34(5):708-712. doi: 10.1007/s00455-018-09975-4. Epub 2019 Jan 8.
The aim of this study was to assess the effects of ice applied to the oral cavity on the excitability of corticobulbar projections to the swallowing muscles. The subjects were 8 healthy adult volunteers (mean age 29.0 ± 4.9 years). Motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) were recorded from the suprahyoid muscle complex using surface electrodes. Two blocks of 20 MEPs with a test stimulus intensity of 120% of the resting motor threshold were recorded at rest (baseline). Subjects then underwent 5-min thermal stimulation by either of 3 different types: (1) "ice-stick inside mouth," (2) "ice-stick on neck," and (3) "room temperature inside mouth." Blocks of 20 MEPs were then recorded immediately and at 5-min intervals for the following 15 min. There was a significant difference in the effects of the 3 interventions on the amplitude of the MEPs following stimulation (two-way ANOVA: INTERVENTION × TIME; F = 3.76, p < 0.01). One-way ANOVA was used to evaluate the changes over time for each intervention type. Only "ice-stick inside mouth" caused an increase in the MEPs (one-way ANOVA main effect of TIME: F = 4.04, p = 0.010) with significant differences between baseline and P10 (mean difference 0.050; confidence interval (CI) 95% 0.019-0.079; p = 0.004). There were no significant effects of either "ice-stick on neck" or "room temperature inside mouth" (F = 1.13, p = 0.36; F = 1.36, p = 0.27, respectively). Ice stimulation within the oral cavity increases the excitability of the cortical swallowing motor pathway.
本研究旨在评估口腔内冰敷对吞咽肌肉皮质脑干投射兴奋性的影响。研究对象为 8 名健康成年志愿者(平均年龄 29.0±4.9 岁)。使用表面电极从舌骨上肌群记录运动诱发电位(MEPs)。在休息时(基线),用 120%静息运动阈值的测试刺激强度记录 2 个 20 个 MEPs 的块。然后,受试者接受 5 分钟的热刺激,采用 3 种不同类型中的任意一种:(1)“冰棒放入口中”,(2)“冰棒放在颈部”和(3)“口腔内室温”。随后,立即记录 20 个 MEPs 的块,并在接下来的 15 分钟内每隔 5 分钟记录一次。刺激后,3 种干预措施对 MEPs 幅度的影响存在显著差异(双向方差分析:干预×时间;F=3.76,p<0.01)。采用单向方差分析评估每种干预类型随时间的变化。只有“冰棒放入口中”导致 MEPs 增加(单向方差分析主要时间效应:F=4.04,p=0.010),与基线和 P10 之间存在显著差异(平均差异 0.050;置信区间 95% 0.019-0.079;p=0.004)。“冰棒放在颈部”或“口腔内室温”均无显著影响(F=1.13,p=0.36;F=1.36,p=0.27)。口腔内冰敷刺激可增加皮质吞咽运动通路的兴奋性。