Darr C, Hadaschik B A, Tschirdewahn S
Klinik und Poliklinik für Urologie, Kinderurologie und Uroonkologie, Universitätsmedizin Essen, Hufelandstr. 55, 45147, Essen, Deutschland.
Urologe A. 2019 Jan;58(1):30-33. doi: 10.1007/s00120-018-0835-8.
Similar to bladder cancer, more than 95% tumors of the upper urinary tract are urothelial carcinoma. At initial diagnosis approximately 60% of the tumors are already invasive. In case of distant metastasis (M+) there is no benefit of radical nephroureterectomy. In those cases, systemic therapy is indicated.
The aim of this article is to present a systematic overview of different therapies in patients with metastatic upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC).
Currently there are insufficient data upon which the recommendations for treatment of locally advanced and metastatic UTUC can be based. Cisplatin-based chemotherapy is the gold standard in first-line treatment of metastatic UTUC. Due to a lower toxicity compared to MVAC (methotrexate, vinblastine, adriamycin plus cisplatin), gemcitabine and cisplatin have become standard. However, carboplatin-based chemotherapies should not be considered interchangeable. Immunomodulatory therapies using checkpoint inhibition, particularly with antibodies directed against PD-1 (programmed cell death 1), PD-L1 (programmed cell death ligand 1) or CTLA-4 (cytotoxic T‑lymphocyte antigen-4) have shown significant antitumor activity with tolerable safety profiles and durable responses in patients with locally advanced and metastatic urothelial carcinoma. In those patients, unfit for cisplatin-based chemotherapy, good response rates have been reported in case of a positive PD-L1 status. However, preliminary data of the KEYNOTE-361 and IMvigor130 studies showed a reduced survival in case of low PD-L1 expression.
与膀胱癌相似,超过95%的上尿路肿瘤为尿路上皮癌。在初次诊断时,约60%的肿瘤已发生浸润。出现远处转移(M+)时,根治性肾输尿管切除术并无益处。在这些情况下,应采用全身治疗。
本文旨在对转移性上尿路尿路上皮癌(UTUC)患者的不同治疗方法进行系统综述。
目前尚无足够的数据作为局部晚期和转移性UTUC治疗推荐的依据。以顺铂为基础的化疗是转移性UTUC一线治疗的金标准。由于与MVAC(甲氨蝶呤、长春碱、阿霉素加顺铂)相比毒性较低,吉西他滨和顺铂已成为标准治疗方案。然而,不应认为以卡铂为基础的化疗可相互替代。使用检查点抑制的免疫调节疗法,特别是使用针对程序性死亡蛋白1(PD-1)、程序性死亡配体1(PD-L1)或细胞毒性T淋巴细胞相关抗原4(CTLA-4)的抗体,在局部晚期和转移性尿路上皮癌患者中显示出显著的抗肿瘤活性,安全性可耐受且反应持久。在那些不适合以顺铂为基础化疗的患者中,若PD-L1状态为阳性,则报告有良好的反应率。然而,KEYNOTE-361和IMvigor130研究的初步数据显示,PD-L1表达较低时患者生存率降低。