Suppr超能文献

日本非心脏手术中动脉脉搏波分析的利用:使用全国性索赔数据库的回顾性观察研究。

Utilization of arterial pulse waveform analysis during non-cardiac surgery in Japan: a retrospective observational study using a nationwide claims database.

机构信息

Department of Pharmacoepidemiology, Graduate School of Medicine and Public Health, Kyoto University, Yoshida-Konoe-cho, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto, 606-8501, Japan.

Department of Anesthesia, Kyoto University Hospital, Kyoto, Japan.

出版信息

J Anesth. 2019 Feb;33(1):159-162. doi: 10.1007/s00540-018-02609-x. Epub 2019 Jan 7.

Abstract

Arterial pulse waveform analysis (APWA) is used for cardiac output monitoring. However, data on the frequency of and patient characteristics for specialized pressure transducer for APWA (S-APWA) use are lacking. We retrospectively identified 175,201 patients aged 18 years or older, who underwent non-cardiac surgery under general anesthesia with an arterial catheter from January 1, 2014, to December 31, 2016. We extracted data on patient demographics, comorbidities, surgical and anesthesia characteristics, and hospital characteristics. Among the full study cohort, 24,605 (14.0%) patients were monitored using S-APWA. Further, the use of S-APWA was higher in patients undergoing high-risk surgery than in those undergoing low-risk surgery [high vs low: adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 1.95; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.76-2.15, moderate vs low: aOR 1.11; 95% CI 1.01-1.22] and those with more comorbidities than in those with less comorbidities (high vs low: aOR 1.49; 95% CI 1.42-1.56, moderate vs low: aOR 1.25; 95% CI 1.20-1.31). S-APWA use was significantly associated with both surgery risk and patients' comorbidities. In conclusion, our study may provide a benchmark for future studies related to the appropriate use of S-APWA.

摘要

动脉脉搏波形分析(APWA)用于心输出量监测。然而,缺乏关于 APWA 专用压力传感器(S-APWA)使用频率和患者特征的数据。我们回顾性地确定了 175,201 名年龄在 18 岁或以上的患者,这些患者在 2014 年 1 月 1 日至 2016 年 12 月 31 日期间在全身麻醉下接受非心脏手术,并使用动脉导管。我们提取了患者人口统计学、合并症、手术和麻醉特征以及医院特征的数据。在全队列研究中,24,605(14.0%)名患者使用 S-APWA 进行监测。此外,高危手术患者比低危手术患者(高 vs 低:调整后的优势比[aOR]1.95;95%置信区间[CI]1.76-2.15,中危 vs 低危:aOR 1.11;95%CI 1.01-1.22)和合并症较多的患者比合并症较少的患者(高 vs 低:aOR 1.49;95%CI 1.42-1.56,中危 vs 低危:aOR 1.25;95%CI 1.20-1.31)更常使用 S-APWA。S-APWA 的使用与手术风险和患者合并症显著相关。总之,我们的研究可能为未来与 S-APWA 合理使用相关的研究提供基准。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验