Pharmacy Division, Hadassah Hebrew University Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel.
Department of Medicine, Hadassah Hebrew University Medical Center, Mt Scopus, 91540, Jerusalem, Israel.
J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2019 May;47(4):590-595. doi: 10.1007/s11239-018-01804-7.
Little is known regarding the management of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) in patients with enzyme-inducing drugs (EID). The use of EID may lead to sub-therapeutic concentrations of DOACs and to treatment failure. Thus, many patients on EIDs cannot benefit from the advantages of DOACs. This was a retrospective study, evaluating the management of hospitalized patients with DOACs. Characteristics of hospitalized patients with a prescription for DOACs, with and without EIDs, were summarized and evaluated, and management strategies addressing the potential interaction were documented, including the use of DOAC concentration monitoring. During the period evaluated, 1596 hospitalized patients with prescriptions for DOACs were identified. Most patients received apixaban (n = 1227, 77%), followed by rivaroxaban (240, 15%), and dabigatran (129, 8%). Twenty-two patients (1.4%) had concomitant EIDs. Demographic and clinical characteristics of hospitalized patients with DOACs were similar in those receiving EID and those not. Management strategies included stopping DOAC or EID (41%), and DOAC dose increase (14%). During management of these interactions, DOAC concentrations were measured for 11 of 22 patients and were below the 5th percentile of expected concentration for six of these patients. The management of patients with DOAC concentration measurement differed significantly from those without (p = 0.005), as they were much less likely to have one of the medications stopped and more often had the DOACs' dose increased. Among hospitalized patients with DOACs, EIDs are not rare. DOAC concentrations are often low in the presence of EIDs. DOAC concentration monitoring may be useful in settings requiring both DOAC and EIDs.
关于合并酶诱导药物(EID)的患者如何管理直接口服抗凝剂(DOAC),目前知之甚少。EID 的使用可能导致 DOAC 浓度低于治疗范围,并导致治疗失败。因此,许多正在使用 EID 的患者无法受益于 DOAC 的优势。这是一项回顾性研究,评估了接受 DOAC 治疗的住院患者的管理情况。总结并评估了有和没有 EID 的接受 DOAC 治疗的住院患者的特征,并记录了针对潜在相互作用的管理策略,包括使用 DOAC 浓度监测。在评估期间,确定了 1596 名接受 DOAC 处方的住院患者。大多数患者接受了阿哌沙班(n=1227,77%),其次是利伐沙班(240,15%)和达比加群(129,8%)。22 名患者(1.4%)合并使用 EID。接受 EID 和未接受 EID 的 DOAC 患者的人口统计学和临床特征相似。管理策略包括停用 DOAC 或 EID(41%)和增加 DOAC 剂量(14%)。在处理这些相互作用时,对 22 名患者中的 11 名进行了 DOAC 浓度测量,其中 6 名患者的 DOAC 浓度低于预期浓度的第 5 百分位。与未进行 DOAC 浓度测量的患者相比,进行了 DOAC 浓度测量的患者的管理方式有显著差异(p=0.005),前者更不可能停用一种药物,而更可能增加 DOAC 的剂量。在接受 DOAC 治疗的住院患者中,EID 并不罕见。EID 存在时 DOAC 浓度往往较低。在需要同时使用 DOAC 和 EID 的情况下,DOAC 浓度监测可能是有用的。