Department of Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston.
Department of Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston.
Am J Med. 2018 May;131(5):573.e9-573.e15. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2017.11.007. Epub 2017 Nov 22.
Direct-acting oral anticoagulants (DOACs), which have gained approval for stroke prevention in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation and treatment of venous thromboembolism, have become increasingly preferred over warfarin given their predictable pharmacodynamics, lack of required monitoring, and superior outcomes. Direct-acting oral anticoagulants have been shown to be associated with an increased frequency of gastrointestinal bleeding compared with warfarin, but the severity and characteristics of gastrointestinal bleeding in these patients is poorly understood.
We retrospectively evaluated electronic medical records of patients with gastrointestinal bleeding (n = 8496) from 2010-2016. We identified 61 patients with gastrointestinal bleeding episodes while treated with DOACs (rivaroxaban, dabigatran, or apixaban) and 123 patients with gastrointestinal bleeding while taking warfarin. We randomly selected a control group of 296 patients with gastrointestinal bleeding who were not receiving anticoagulation treatment from the same sample. Outcomes included the need for hospitalization, blood transfusion, endoscopic or surgical intervention, and 30-day mortality.
The DOAC and warfarin groups were similar in terms of age and underlying comorbidity (assessed using the Charlson Comorbidity Index), but the DOAC group had greater concomitant aspirin use. Gastrointestinal bleeding was classified as upper (n = 186), lower (n = 88), anorectal (n = 183), small bowel (n = 9), and indeterminate (n = 14). After adjusting for differences in baseline variables, the DOAC group had fewer hospitalizations and required fewer transfusions than the warfarin group. The DOAC and control groups were not statistically different for all outcomes. There were no significant mortality differences among groups.
Although prior studies have shown a higher frequency of gastrointestinal bleeding in patients treated with DOACs compared with warfarin, our data suggest that gastrointestinal bleeding in patients taking DOACs may be less severe. These differences occurred despite significantly greater concomitant aspirin use in the DOAC group compared with warfarin users.
直接口服抗凝剂(DOAC)已获准用于非瓣膜性心房颤动的卒中预防和静脉血栓栓塞的治疗,由于其可预测的药代动力学、无需监测以及更好的结果,已逐渐取代华法林。与华法林相比,DOAC 已被证明与胃肠道出血的发生率增加有关,但这些患者胃肠道出血的严重程度和特征尚不清楚。
我们回顾性评估了 2010 年至 2016 年期间胃肠道出血(n=8496)患者的电子病历。我们确定了 61 例接受 DOAC(利伐沙班、达比加群或阿哌沙班)治疗时发生胃肠道出血的患者和 123 例服用华法林时发生胃肠道出血的患者。我们从同一样本中随机选择了 296 例未接受抗凝治疗的胃肠道出血对照组患者。结果包括住院、输血、内镜或手术干预和 30 天死亡率。
DOAC 和华法林组在年龄和潜在合并症(使用 Charlson 合并症指数评估)方面相似,但 DOAC 组同时使用阿司匹林的比例更高。胃肠道出血分为上消化道(n=186)、下消化道(n=88)、肛门直肠(n=183)、小肠(n=9)和不明(n=14)。调整基线变量差异后,DOAC 组的住院率和输血需求均低于华法林组。DOAC 组和对照组在所有结果上均无统计学差异。各组间无显著死亡率差异。
尽管先前的研究表明,与华法林相比,接受 DOAC 治疗的患者胃肠道出血频率更高,但我们的数据表明,服用 DOAC 的患者胃肠道出血可能不太严重。尽管 DOAC 组与华法林组相比,同时使用阿司匹林的比例明显更高,但仍存在这些差异。