• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一期与两期骶神经刺激器置放术的比较效果。

Comparative effectiveness of one versus two-stage sacral neurostimulation device placement.

机构信息

Cedars Sinai Medical Center, Division of Urology Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California.

出版信息

Neurourol Urodyn. 2019 Feb;38(2):734-739. doi: 10.1002/nau.23908. Epub 2019 Jan 8.

DOI:10.1002/nau.23908
PMID:30620133
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Sacral neurostimulation (SNS) is an effective third-line treatment for overactive bladder. We sought to compare the cost of standard two-stage SNS device placement to that of a combined one-stage placement using a Markov chain model.

METHODS

Costs were defined using Medicare outpatient reimbursement rates. The model was developed as follows: With the two-stage approach, patients underwent initial lead placement with fluoroscopy and those who converted to stage two underwent permanent generator placement week later. Patients who did not convert underwent lead removal. Patients undergoing a one-stage procedure had initial lead and generator placement at the same time. Patients with success underwent no further procedure. Patients without success could opt for generator and lead removal. Cost effectiveness of one versus two-stage placement depended on successful conversion rate.

RESULTS

Reimbursement included physician, anesthesia, facility and device fees. In a two-stage procedure, initial cost of lead placement was $6170. With successful conversion, cost of a second procedure with permanent lead and generator placement was $18,474. Patients who failed test phase underwent lead removal for a cost of $2879. In a one-stage procedure approach, initial cost of permanent lead and generator placement was $18,474. Patients with a successful outcome had no additional costs. Patients with an unsuccessful outcome could have the lead and generator removal for a cost of $5758. If the conversion rate from testing phase to permanent placement was greater than 71%, a one-stage approach proved to be cost effective.

CONCLUSIONS

Identifying patients with favorable risk factors for success may predict those patients who warrant a one-stage approach.

摘要

目的

骶神经刺激(SNS)是治疗膀胱过度活动症的有效三线治疗方法。我们旨在比较标准两阶段 SNS 设备放置与使用马尔可夫链模型的联合一阶段放置的成本。

方法

使用医疗保险门诊报销率来定义成本。该模型的开发如下:在两阶段方法中,患者首先进行透视引导的初始引线放置,那些转为第二阶段的患者在一周后进行永久性发生器放置。未转换的患者进行引线移除。接受一阶段手术的患者同时进行初始引线和发生器放置。成功的患者无需进行进一步的手术。不成功的患者可以选择移除发生器和引线。一阶段与两阶段放置的成本效益取决于成功转换率。

结果

报销包括医生、麻醉、设施和设备费用。在两阶段手术中,初始引线放置的成本为 6170 美元。如果成功转换,带有永久性引线和发生器放置的第二次手术的成本为 18474 美元。在测试阶段失败的患者需要进行引线移除,费用为 2879 美元。在一阶段手术中,永久性引线和发生器放置的初始成本为 18474 美元。成功的患者没有额外的费用。不成功的患者可以进行引线和发生器移除,费用为 5758 美元。如果从测试阶段到永久性放置的转换率大于 71%,则一阶段方法具有成本效益。

结论

确定具有成功有利风险因素的患者可能预测那些需要一阶段方法的患者。

相似文献

1
Comparative effectiveness of one versus two-stage sacral neurostimulation device placement.一期与两期骶神经刺激器置放术的比较效果。
Neurourol Urodyn. 2019 Feb;38(2):734-739. doi: 10.1002/nau.23908. Epub 2019 Jan 8.
2
Comparison of patients undergoing a two-stage sacral nerve stimulation procedure: is there a cost benefit for a single-stage procedure?比较行两阶段骶神经刺激术的患者:单阶段手术是否具有成本效益?
Int Urol Nephrol. 2011 Dec;43(4):997-1002. doi: 10.1007/s11255-011-9919-8. Epub 2011 Mar 10.
3
To stage or not to stage?-A cost minimization analysis of sacral neuromodulation placement strategies.是否分期手术?—骶神经调节置入策略的成本最小化分析。
Neurourol Urodyn. 2019 Aug;38(6):1783-1791. doi: 10.1002/nau.24075. Epub 2019 Jun 19.
4
Single Institutional Experience with Single Stage Sacral Neuromodulation: Cost Savings and Outcomes in a Contemporary Case Series.单中心单阶段骶神经调节的经验:当代病例系列的成本节约和结果。
J Urol. 2020 Mar;203(3):604-610. doi: 10.1097/JU.0000000000000576. Epub 2019 Oct 4.
5
The cost-effectiveness of sacral nerve stimulation (SNS) for the treatment of idiopathic medically refractory overactive bladder (wet) in the UK.骶神经刺激(SNS)治疗英国特发性药物难治性膀胱过度活动症(伴尿失禁)的成本效益
BJU Int. 2015 Dec;116(6):945-54. doi: 10.1111/bju.12972. Epub 2015 Jun 25.
6
Statewide Success of Staged Sacral Neuromodulation for the Treatment of Urinary Complaints in California (2005-2011).加利福尼亚州分期骶神经调节治疗泌尿系统疾病的全州范围成功经验(2005 - 2011年)
Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2020 Jul;26(7):437-442. doi: 10.1097/SPV.0000000000000605.
7
Long term safety of sacral nerve modulation in medicare beneficiaries.医疗保险受益人群中骶神经调节的长期安全性
Neurourol Urodyn. 2015 Sep;34(7):659-63. doi: 10.1002/nau.22618. Epub 2014 Jul 25.
8
Sacral nerve stimulation for refractory overactive bladder in the elderly population.骶神经刺激治疗老年难治性膀胱过度活动症
J Urol. 2009 Oct;182(4):1449-52. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2009.06.049. Epub 2009 Aug 15.
9
Prospective randomized study evaluating ultrasound versus fluoroscopy guided sacral InterStim® lead placement: A pilot study.前瞻性随机研究评估超声与透视引导骶神经 InterStim® 刺激器植入:一项初步研究。
Neurourol Urodyn. 2018 Jun;37(5):1737-1743. doi: 10.1002/nau.23502. Epub 2018 Feb 21.
10
Cost profiles and budget impact of rechargeable versus non-rechargeable sacral neuromodulation devices in the treatment of overactive bladder syndrome.可充电式与不可充电式骶神经调节装置治疗膀胱过度活动症的成本概况及预算影响
Neurourol Urodyn. 2017 Mar;36(3):727-733. doi: 10.1002/nau.23008. Epub 2016 Apr 6.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluation of progression from first to second stage sacral neuromodulation and unplanned device removal.评估从第一阶段到第二阶段骶神经调节的进展以及非计划的设备移除情况。
Turk J Urol. 2021 Jan;47(1):58-65. doi: 10.5152/tud.2020.20288. Epub 2020 Oct 26.