Centre de Recherche du Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CRCHUM), Montreal, Québec, Canada.
Département d'administration de la santé, École de santé publique, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Canada.
PLoS One. 2019 Jan 8;14(1):e0209054. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0209054. eCollection 2019.
Recent randomised controlled trials in Bangladesh and Kenya concluded that household water treatment, alone or in combination with upgraded sanitation and handwashing, did not reduce linear growth faltering or improve other child growth outcomes. Whether these results are applicable in areas with distinct constellations of water, sanitation and hygiene (WaSH) risks is unknown. Analysis of observational data offers an efficient means to assess the external validity of trial findings. We studied whether a water quality intervention could improve child growth in a rural Indian setting with higher levels of circulating pathogens than the original trial sites.
We analysed a cross-sectional dataset including a microbiological measure of household water quality. All households accessed water from an improved source. We applied propensity score methods to emulate a randomised trial investigating the hypothesis that receipt of drinking water meeting Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) 6.1 quality standards for absence of faecal contamination leads to improved growth. Growth outcomes (stunting, underweight, wasting, and their corresponding Z-scores) were assessed in children 12-23 months of age. For each outcome, we estimated the mean and 95% confidence interval of the absolute risk difference between treatment groups.
Of 1088 households, 442 (40.62%) received drinking water meeting SDG 6.1 standards. The adjusted risk of child underweight was 7.4% (1.3% to 13.4%) lower among those drinking water satisfying SDG 6.1 norms than among controls. Evidence concerning the relationship of drinking water meeting SDG 6.1 norms to length-for-age and weight-for-age was inconclusive, and there was no apparent relationship with stunting or wasting.
In contexts characterised by high pathogen transmission, water quality improvements have the potential to reduce the proportion of underweight children, but are unlikely to impact stunting or wasting. Further research is required to assess how these modelled benefits can best be achieved in real world settings.
最近在孟加拉国和肯尼亚进行的随机对照试验得出结论,家庭水处理单独或与升级的卫生设施和洗手结合使用,并没有减少线性生长迟缓或改善其他儿童生长结果。这些结果是否适用于具有不同水、环境卫生和个人卫生(WASH)风险组合的地区尚不清楚。观察性数据分析提供了一种评估试验结果外部有效性的有效方法。我们研究了在一个印度农村地区,水质干预是否可以改善儿童的生长情况,该地区的循环病原体水平高于原始试验地点。
我们分析了一个包含家庭水质微生物测量的横断面数据集。所有家庭都从改良水源获取水。我们应用倾向评分方法模拟一项随机试验,该试验研究了这样一个假设,即接受符合可持续发展目标(SDG)6.1 粪便无污染物质量标准的饮用水是否会导致生长改善。在 12-23 个月大的儿童中评估生长结果(发育迟缓、体重不足、消瘦和相应的 Z 分数)。对于每个结果,我们估计了治疗组之间绝对风险差异的平均值和 95%置信区间。
在 1088 户家庭中,有 442 户(40.62%)家庭的饮用水符合 SDG 6.1 标准。与对照组相比,饮用符合 SDG 6.1 规范的水的儿童体重不足的风险降低了 7.4%(1.3%至 13.4%)。关于符合 SDG 6.1 规范的饮用水与年龄别身长和年龄别体重的关系的证据尚无定论,而且与发育迟缓或消瘦之间似乎没有关系。
在高病原体传播的背景下,水质改善有可能降低体重不足儿童的比例,但不太可能影响发育迟缓或消瘦。需要进一步研究如何在实际环境中实现这些模拟效益。