Suppr超能文献

右美托咪定与瑞芬太尼联合七氟醚用于肝细胞癌射频消融术的比较:一项随机对照试验

Comparison of dexmedetomidine vs. remifentanil combined with sevoflurane during radiofrequency ablation of hepatocellular carcinoma: a randomized controlled trial.

作者信息

Pan Jingru, Li Xianlong, He Ye, Jian Chaojun, Chen Hui-Xin, Hei Ziqing, Zhou Shaoli

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology, Third Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510630, People's Republic of China.

Department of Anesthesiology, The University of Hong Kong-Shenzhen Hospital, Shenzhen, Guangdong, People's Republic of China.

出版信息

Trials. 2019 Jan 8;20(1):28. doi: 10.1186/s13063-018-3010-z.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Remifentanil is widely used for ultrasound-guided percutaneous radiofrequency ablation (RFA) of small hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). We determined whether dexmedetomidine could be an alternative to remifentanil for RFA of HCC under general anesthesia with sevoflurane.

METHODS

We prospectively randomized patients scheduled to undergo RFA for HCC to a dexmedetomidine (DEX) group or remifentanil (REMI) group (47 patients each). In the DEX group, a bolus infusion (0.4 μg kg) was started 15 min before anesthesia induction and continued at 0.2 μg kg h until 10 min before the end of surgery. In the REMI group, 3 μg kg h of remifentanil was administered from 15 min before anesthesia induction to the end of the surgery. The primary endpoint was postoperative pain intensity. Secondary endpoints included analgesic requirement, postoperative liver function, patient comfort, and hemodynamic changes. Group allocation was concealed from patients and data analysts but not from anesthesiologists.

RESULTS

Postoperative pain intensity, analgesic consumption, comfort, liver function, and time to emergence and extubation did not differ between the two groups. Heart rate, but not mean arterial pressure, was significantly lower in the DEX group than in the REMI group, at 1 min after intubation and from 30 min after the start of the surgery until anesthesia recovery. Sevoflurane concentration and dosage were significantly lower in the DEX group than in the REMI group.

CONCLUSION

During RFA for HCC, low-dose dexmedetomidine reduced the heart rate and need for inhalational anesthetics, without exacerbating postoperative discomfort or liver dysfunction. Although it did not exhibit outstanding advantages over remifentanil in terms of pain management, dexmedetomidine could be a safe alternative adjuvant for RFA under sevoflurane anesthesia.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Chinese Clinical Trial Registry, ChiCTR-OPC-15006613 . Registered on 16 June 2015.

摘要

背景

瑞芬太尼广泛用于超声引导下小肝细胞癌(HCC)的经皮射频消融(RFA)。我们确定在七氟烷全身麻醉下,右美托咪定是否可替代瑞芬太尼用于HCC的RFA。

方法

我们将计划接受HCC-RFA的患者前瞻性随机分为右美托咪定(DEX)组或瑞芬太尼(REMI)组(每组47例)。在DEX组中,麻醉诱导前15分钟开始静脉推注(0.4μg/kg),并以0.2μg·kg-1·h持续输注至手术结束前10分钟。在REMI组中,从麻醉诱导前15分钟至手术结束给予3μg·kg-1·h的瑞芬太尼。主要终点是术后疼痛强度。次要终点包括镇痛需求、术后肝功能、患者舒适度和血流动力学变化。患者和数据分析人员对分组情况不知情,但麻醉医生知晓。

结果

两组术后疼痛强度、镇痛药物用量、舒适度、肝功能以及苏醒和拔管时间无差异。在插管后1分钟以及手术开始后30分钟至麻醉恢复期间,DEX组心率显著低于REMI组,但平均动脉压无差异。DEX组七氟烷浓度和用量显著低于REMI组。

结论

在HCC的RFA过程中,低剂量右美托咪定可降低心率和吸入麻醉药需求,且不会加重术后不适或肝功能障碍。尽管在疼痛管理方面,右美托咪定未显示出优于瑞芬太尼的显著优势,但在七氟烷麻醉下,右美托咪定可能是RFA安全的替代辅助药物。

试验注册

中国临床试验注册中心,ChiCTR-OPC-15006613。于2015年6月16日注册。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ce92/6326039/f383772ca5c6/13063_2018_3010_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验