Noten M M P G, van der Heijden K B, Huijbregts S C J, Bouw N, van Goozen S H M, Swaab H
Department of Clinical Neurodevelopmental Sciences, Leiden University, Leiden, the Netherlands; Leiden Institute for Brain and Cognition, Leiden University, Leiden, the Netherlands.
Department of Clinical Neurodevelopmental Sciences, Leiden University, Leiden, the Netherlands; Leiden Institute for Brain and Cognition, Leiden University, Leiden, the Netherlands.
Infant Behav Dev. 2019 Feb;54:57-65. doi: 10.1016/j.infbeh.2018.11.001. Epub 2019 Jan 7.
Impaired empathy is an important risk factor of aggression, but results are contradictory in toddlerhood. The association between empathy and aggression may differ for empathic distress and empathic concern in response to empathy-evoking situations, and for boys and girls. Therefore, the current study investigated whether empathic distress and empathic concern at age 20 months (N = 133, 69 boys) predicted aggression at ages 20 and 30 months (N = 119, 62 boys), while taking a potential moderating effect of sex into account. Empathic behavior was observed during a distress simulation task 20 months post-partum. Physical aggression was assessed through maternal report, using the Physical Aggression Scale for Early Childhood. Linear regression analyses revealed sex differences in the associations between empathic distress and concern on the one hand and physical aggression at age 20 months on the other. Furthermore, physical aggression at age 30 months was predicted by the interaction of sex with empathic distress at age 20 months, while controlling for aggression at age 20 months. More empathic distress and concern were associated with less physical aggression in girls, but not in boys. The findings indicate that the prediction of physical aggression by empathic distress was more robust over time than for empathic concern. This study sheds new light on the intricate relationship between empathy, aggression, and sex from a developmental perspective.
共情能力受损是攻击行为的一个重要风险因素,但在幼儿期的研究结果相互矛盾。在引发共情的情境中,共情痛苦和共情关注所引发的共情与攻击行为之间的关联,可能因性别不同而有所差异。因此,本研究调查了20个月大时的共情痛苦和共情关注(N = 133,69名男孩)是否能预测20个月和30个月大时的攻击行为(N = 119,62名男孩),同时考虑了性别的潜在调节作用。在产后20个月的痛苦模拟任务中观察共情行为。通过母亲报告,使用幼儿身体攻击量表评估身体攻击行为。线性回归分析显示,一方面,共情痛苦和关注与另一方面20个月大时的身体攻击行为之间的关联存在性别差异。此外,在控制20个月大时的攻击行为的情况下,30个月大时的身体攻击行为可由20个月大时的性别与共情痛苦的交互作用预测。更多的共情痛苦和关注与女孩较少的身体攻击行为相关,但与男孩无关。研究结果表明,随着时间的推移,共情痛苦对身体攻击行为的预测比共情关注更为稳健。本研究从发展的角度为共情、攻击行为和性别之间的复杂关系提供了新的见解。