Decety Jean, Lewis Kimberly L, Cowell Jason M
Child Neurosuite, Department of Psychology, The University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois; and Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Neuroscience, The University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois
Child Neurosuite, Department of Psychology, The University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois; and.
J Neurophysiol. 2015 Jul;114(1):493-504. doi: 10.1152/jn.00253.2015. Epub 2015 May 6.
Empathic impairment is one of the hallmarks of psychopathy, a personality dimension associated with poverty in affective reactions, lack of attachment to others, and a callous disregard for the feelings, rights, and welfare of others. Neuroscience research on the relation between empathy and psychopathy has predominately focused on the affective sharing and cognitive components of empathy in forensic populations, and much less on empathic concern. The current study used high-density electroencephalography in a community sample to examine the spatiotemporal neurodynamic responses when viewing people in physical distress under two subjective contexts: one evoking affective sharing, the other, empathic concern. Results indicate that early automatic (175-275 ms) and later controlled responses (LPP 400-1,000 ms) were differentially modulated by engagement in affective sharing or empathic concern. Importantly, the late event-related potentials (ERP) component was significantly impacted by dispositional empathy and psychopathy, but the early component was not. Individual differences in dispositional empathic concern directly predicted gamma coherence (25-40 Hz), whereas psychopathy was inversely modulatory. Interestingly, significant suppression in the mu/alpha band (8-13 Hz) when perceiving others in distress was positively associated with higher trait psychopathy, which argues against the assumption that sensorimotor resonance underpins empathy. Greater scores on trait psychopathy were inversely related to subjective ratings of both empathic concern and affective sharing. Overall, the study demonstrates that neural markers of affective sharing and empathic concern to the same cues of another's distress can be distinguished at an electrophysiological level, and that psychopathy alters later time-locked differentiations and spectral coherence associated with empathic concern.
共情障碍是精神病态的标志之一,精神病态是一种人格维度,与情感反应匮乏、缺乏对他人的依恋以及对他人的感受、权利和福利的冷漠无视有关。关于共情与精神病态之间关系的神经科学研究主要集中在法医群体中共情的情感分享和认知成分上,而对共情关注的研究则少得多。本研究在一个社区样本中使用高密度脑电图来检查在两种主观情境下观看处于身体痛苦中的人时的时空神经动力学反应:一种情境引发情感分享,另一种情境引发共情关注。结果表明,早期自动反应(175 - 275毫秒)和后期控制反应(LPP 400 - 1000毫秒)在参与情感分享或共情关注时受到不同的调节。重要的是,晚期事件相关电位(ERP)成分受到特质共情和精神病态的显著影响,但早期成分不受影响。特质共情关注的个体差异直接预测了伽马相干性(25 - 40赫兹),而精神病态则具有反向调节作用。有趣的是,在感知他人痛苦时,μ/α频段(8 - 13赫兹)的显著抑制与较高的特质精神病态呈正相关,这与感觉运动共振是共情基础的假设相悖。特质精神病态得分越高,与共情关注和情感分享的主观评分呈负相关。总体而言,该研究表明,在电生理水平上可以区分对他人痛苦相同线索的情感分享和共情关注的神经标记,并且精神病态会改变与共情关注相关的后期时间锁定差异和频谱相干性。