Fan Yun, Artz Andrew S, van Besien Koen, Stock Wendy, Larson Richard A, Odenike Olatoyosi, Godley Lucy A, Kline Justin, Cunningham John M, LaBelle James L, Bishop Michael R, Liu Hongtao
1Department of Hematology, Beijing Hospital, Beijing, China.
2Department of Medicine, Section of Hematology/Oncology, The University of Chicago Medical Center, 5841 S. Maryland, MC 2115, Chicago, IL 60637-1470 USA.
Exp Hematol Oncol. 2019 Jan 3;8:1. doi: 10.1186/s40164-018-0125-6. eCollection 2019.
Second allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HCT) remains as an option for disease relapse after initial HCT.
We analyzed retrospectively the outcomes of 65 consecutive patients who underwent a second HCT for disease relapse at the University of Chicago. Univariate and multivariate analysis were conducted, and a scoring system was generated to select the patients who would benefit second HCT.
All except four patients received T cell depleted (TCD) first HCT. The majority of patients had AML (n = 47) and high risk MDS (n = 5). The median age at second HCT was 45 years (11-73). 13 patients (20%) achieved CR before second HCT. 98% (n = 64) and 72% (n = 47) patients achieved neutrophil and platelet engraftment at a median interval of 10 and 18 days, respectively, following the second HCT. With a median follow up of 23 (5.5-140) months for survivors after second HCT, the estimated 2 years PFS was 17.5% and the 2 years OS was 22.6%. The day 100 cumulative incidence of non-relapse mortality rate was 23.6%, and the cumulative incidence of aGVHD and cGVHD were 16.9% and 7.7% respectively at 1 year after second HCT. In univariate analysis, patients with remission duration after first HCT of > 12 months and those in CR before second HCT had significantly better PFS and OS. A scoring system using disease status before second HCT (CR = 0 vs. non-CR = 1), and remission duration after first HCT (< 6 = 2, 6-12 = 1 and > 12 months = 0) was generated as an approach to classify patients into different risk categories in the purpose to provide guidance to the transplant physician to inform the outcomes to potential patients undergoing 2nd HCT. A score of < 2 (n = 26) identified a group with PFS and OS of 31.6% and 36.2% at 2 years after second HCT.
In conclusion, second HCT is a viable option for disease relapse after TCD HCT for patients entering second HCT in remission and/or remission duration > 12 months after first HCT with acceptable rates of GVHD and donor engraftment.
第二次异基因造血干细胞移植(HCT)仍是初始HCT后疾病复发的一种选择。
我们回顾性分析了芝加哥大学65例因疾病复发接受第二次HCT的连续患者的结局。进行了单因素和多因素分析,并生成了一个评分系统以选择能从第二次HCT中获益的患者。
除4例患者外,所有患者均接受了去除T细胞(TCD)的首次HCT。大多数患者患有急性髓系白血病(n = 47)和高危骨髓增生异常综合征(n = 5)。第二次HCT时的中位年龄为45岁(11 - 73岁)。13例患者(20%)在第二次HCT前达到完全缓解(CR)。第二次HCT后,分别有98%(n = 64)和72%(n = 47)的患者在中位间隔10天和18天后实现中性粒细胞和血小板植入。第二次HCT后存活者的中位随访时间为23(5.5 - 140)个月,估计2年无进展生存期(PFS)为17.5%,2年总生存期(OS)为22.6%。第二次HCT后100天非复发死亡率的累积发生率为23.6%,急性移植物抗宿主病(aGVHD)和慢性移植物抗宿主病(cGVHD)在第二次HCT后1年的累积发生率分别为16.9%和7.7%。在单因素分析中,首次HCT后缓解持续时间> 12个月的患者以及第二次HCT前处于CR的患者的PFS和OS明显更好。生成了一个评分系统,使用第二次HCT前的疾病状态(CR = 0 vs.非CR = 1)以及首次HCT后的缓解持续时间(< 6个月 = 2,6 - 12个月 = 1和> 12个月 = 0),目的是将患者分为不同风险类别,为移植医生提供指导,以便向接受第二次HCT的潜在患者告知结局。评分< 2(n = 26)的一组患者在第二次HCT后2年的PFS和OS分别为31.6%和36.2%。
总之,对于首次HCT后处于缓解期和/或缓解持续时间> 12个月且接受第二次HCT的患者,第二次HCT是TCD HCT后疾病复发的一个可行选择,其移植物抗宿主病和供体植入率可接受。