Struck J P, Cebulla A, Ralla B, Koenig J
Klinik für Urologie, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck, Lübeck, Deutschland.
Klinik für Urologie und Kinderurologie, Universitätsklinikum Ulm, Ulm, Deutschland.
Urologe A. 2019 Feb;58(2):109-113. doi: 10.1007/s00120-018-0847-4.
Current surveys show that 45% of German urologic residents do not feel sufficiently prepared for their later urologic work, and 85% lack a structured training curriculum in their home institutions. Furthermore, they report a lack of transparency and evaluations as well as economic constraints. This gives reason to revise and adapt the current urologic training curriculum. In the following article we compare the current urologic curriculum with other disciplines and discuss chances and limits of possible future models. These include better definitions of basic training skills, specialization, a structured evaluation system, standardization of exams and room for research.
目前的调查显示，45%的德国泌尿外科住院医生认为自己对日后的泌尿外科工作准备不足，85%的人在其所在机构缺乏结构化的培训课程。此外，他们还表示缺乏透明度和评估，以及存在经济限制。这使得有理由修订和调整当前的泌尿外科培训课程。在接下来的文章中，我们将当前的泌尿外科课程与其他学科进行比较，并讨论未来可能模式的机遇和局限。这些包括对基础培训技能、专业化、结构化评估系统、考试标准化以及研究空间的更明确界定。
