• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

免费全科医生就诊扩大服务是否影响了急诊就诊需求?一项双重差分分析。

Did the expansion of free GP care impact demand for Emergency Department attendances? A difference-in-differences analysis.

机构信息

Economic and Social Research Institute, Whitaker Square, Sir John Rogerson's Quay, Dublin 2, Dublin, Ireland.

Economic and Social Research Institute, Whitaker Square, Sir John Rogerson's Quay, Dublin 2, Dublin, Ireland.

出版信息

Soc Sci Med. 2019 Feb;222:101-111. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2018.12.029. Epub 2018 Dec 26.

DOI:10.1016/j.socscimed.2018.12.029
PMID:30623795
Abstract

The removal of co-payments for General Practitioner (GP) services has been shown to increase utilisation of GP care. The introduction of free GP care may also have spillover effects on utilisation of other healthcare such as Emergency Department (ED) services, which often serve as substitutes for primary care, and where co-payments to attend exist for many. In Ireland, out-of-pocket payments are paid by the majority of the population to access GP care, and these costs are amongst the highest in Europe. However, in July 2015 all children in Ireland aged under 6 became eligible for free GP care. Using a large administrative dataset on 413,562 ED attendances between January 2015 and June 2016 we apply a difference-in-differences method, with treatment and control groups differentiated by age, to examine whether ED utilisation changed amongst younger children following the introduction of universal free GP care. In particular, we examine ED attendances following a GP referral, as referrals from GPs also afford access to the ED free of charge. We find that the expansion of free GP care did not reduce overall ED utilisation for under 6s. Additionally, we find that the proportion of ED attendances occurring through GP referrals increased by over 2 percentage points. This latter finding may be indicative of increased pressure placed on GPs from increased demand. Overall, this study finds that expanding free GP care to all young children did not reduce their ED utilisation.

摘要

取消全科医生(GP)服务的共付额已被证明会增加 GP 护理的利用率。免费 GP 护理的引入也可能对其他医疗保健的利用率产生溢出效应,例如急诊部(ED)服务,ED 服务通常是初级保健的替代品,而许多 ED 服务都存在共付额。在爱尔兰,大多数人需要支付自付费用才能获得 GP 护理,其费用在欧洲是最高的之一。然而,2015 年 7 月,爱尔兰所有 6 岁以下的儿童都有资格获得免费的 GP 护理。我们使用了一个关于 2015 年 1 月至 2016 年 6 月期间 413562 次 ED 就诊的大型行政数据集,应用了一种差异法,根据年龄将治疗组和对照组区分开来,以检验在引入普遍免费 GP 护理后,年轻儿童的 ED 利用率是否发生了变化。特别是,我们考察了在 GP 转诊后发生的 ED 就诊情况,因为 GP 转诊也可以免费获得 ED 服务。我们发现,扩大免费 GP 护理并没有降低 6 岁以下儿童的整体 ED 利用率。此外,我们发现,通过 GP 转诊发生的 ED 就诊比例增加了超过 2 个百分点。这一发现可能表明,由于需求增加,GP 面临的压力增大。总体而言,本研究发现,为所有年幼的孩子扩大免费 GP 护理并没有降低他们对 ED 的利用率。

相似文献

1
Did the expansion of free GP care impact demand for Emergency Department attendances? A difference-in-differences analysis.免费全科医生就诊扩大服务是否影响了急诊就诊需求?一项双重差分分析。
Soc Sci Med. 2019 Feb;222:101-111. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2018.12.029. Epub 2018 Dec 26.
2
Paediatric attendances of the emergency department in a major Irish tertiary referral centre before and after expansion of free GP care to children under 6: a retrospective observational study.爱尔兰主要的三级转诊中心在向 6 岁以下儿童免费提供全科医生护理前后的急诊儿科就诊情况:一项回顾性观察研究。
BMJ Paediatr Open. 2021 Feb 17;5(1):e000862. doi: 10.1136/bmjpo-2020-000862. eCollection 2021.
3
Policy of free GP care for children under 6 years: The impact on emergency department attendance.免费为 6 岁以下儿童提供全科医生服务政策:对急诊科就诊的影响。
Soc Sci Med. 2021 Jun;279:113988. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.113988. Epub 2021 May 4.
4
Emergency department referral patterns of Australian general practitioner registrars: a cross-sectional analysis of prevalence, nature and associations.澳大利亚全科医生注册实习生的急诊科转诊模式:患病率、性质及关联的横断面分析
Aust Health Rev. 2019 Feb;43(1):21-28. doi: 10.1071/AH17005.
5
Clinician consensus on "Inappropriate" presentations to the Emergency Department in the Better Data, Better Planning (BDBP) census: a cross-sectional multi-centre study of emergency department utilisation in Ireland.临床医生对“不合适”的急诊就诊的共识:爱尔兰急诊利用的横断面多中心研究。(Better Data, Better Planning (BDBP) 普查)
BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 Sep 18;23(1):1003. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-09760-6.
6
How does the introduction of free GP care for children impact on GP service provision? A qualitative study of GPs.为儿童提供免费全科医生护理对全科医生服务提供有何影响?一项针对全科医生的定性研究。
Ir J Med Sci. 2019 Nov;188(4):1245-1249. doi: 10.1007/s11845-019-01997-7. Epub 2019 Mar 9.
7
Walk-ins seeking treatment at an emergency department or general practitioner out-of-hours service: a cross-sectional comparison.急诊或全科医生非工作时间就诊的上门就诊者:一项横断面比较。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2011 May 9;11:94. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-11-94.
8
An investigation of the effect of accessibility to General Practitioner services on healthcare utilisation among older people.一项关于普通科医生服务可及性对老年人医疗利用影响的调查。
Soc Sci Med. 2019 Jan;220:254-263. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2018.11.028. Epub 2018 Nov 16.
9
Primary Care Access, Emergency Department Visits, and Unplanned Short Hospitalizations in the UK.英国的初级医疗服务、急诊就诊及非计划短期住院情况
Pediatrics. 2016 Feb;137(2):e20151492. doi: 10.1542/peds.2015-1492. Epub 2016 Jan 20.
10
Patient and care characteristics of self-referrals treated by the general practitioner cooperative at emergency-care-access-points in the Netherlands.荷兰全科医生合作社在急诊接入点治疗的自我转诊患者及护理特征。
BMC Fam Pract. 2017 May 12;18(1):62. doi: 10.1186/s12875-017-0633-1.

引用本文的文献

1
Will the increase of medical equipment affect medical expenditure? Empirical evidence from a quasi-experiment in China.医疗设备的增加会影响医疗支出吗?来自中国一项准实验的实证证据。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2025 Jan 15;25(1):81. doi: 10.1186/s12913-025-12209-7.
2
Does contracting family doctor promote primary healthcare utilization among older adults? - evidence from a difference-in-differences analysis.签约家庭医生是否能促进老年人对基层医疗保健的利用?——来自双重差分分析的证据。
BMC Geriatr. 2024 Sep 10;24(1):749. doi: 10.1186/s12877-024-05336-z.
3
A Quasi-experimental Study on the Effect of Pre-entry Tuberculosis Screening for Immigrants on Treatment Outcomes in South Korea: A Difference-in-Differences Analysis.
韩国移民入境前结核病筛查对治疗结果影响的准实验研究:双重差分分析
J Epidemiol Glob Health. 2024 Mar;14(1):154-161. doi: 10.1007/s44197-023-00181-6. Epub 2024 Jan 23.
4
Can higher spending on primary healthcare mitigate the impact of ageing and non-communicable diseases on health expenditure?更多投入于初级医疗保健是否能减轻人口老龄化和非传染性疾病对医疗支出的影响?
BMJ Glob Health. 2022 Dec;7(12). doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2022-010513.
5
Does the abolition of copayment increase ambulatory care utilization?: a quasi-experimental study in Germany.取消共付额是否会增加门诊服务利用率?:德国的一项准实验研究。
Eur J Health Econ. 2022 Nov;23(8):1319-1328. doi: 10.1007/s10198-022-01430-4. Epub 2022 Jan 27.
6
Paediatric attendances of the emergency department in a major Irish tertiary referral centre before and after expansion of free GP care to children under 6: a retrospective observational study.爱尔兰主要的三级转诊中心在向 6 岁以下儿童免费提供全科医生护理前后的急诊儿科就诊情况:一项回顾性观察研究。
BMJ Paediatr Open. 2021 Feb 17;5(1):e000862. doi: 10.1136/bmjpo-2020-000862. eCollection 2021.
7
Factors influencing general practitioners decisions to refer Paediatric patients to the emergency department: a systematic review and narrative synthesis.影响全科医生将儿科患者转介至急诊科决定的因素:系统评价和叙述性综合。
BMC Fam Pract. 2020 Oct 16;21(1):210. doi: 10.1186/s12875-020-01277-9.
8
Children's unscheduled primary and emergency care in Ireland: a multimethod approach to understanding decision making, trends, outcomes and parental perspectives (CUPID): project protocol.爱尔兰儿童非预约初级和急救护理:一种理解决策、趋势、结果及家长观点的多方法途径(CUPID):项目方案
BMJ Open. 2020 Aug 13;10(8):e036729. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-036729.