Lee Kathleen V, Goblirsch Michael, McDermott Erin, Tarpy David R, Spivak Marla
Department of Entomology, University of Minnesota, 1980 Folwell Ave, Suite 219, Saint Paul, MN 55108, USA.
Department of Entomology & Plant Pathology, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695, USA.
Insects. 2019 Jan 8;10(1):12. doi: 10.3390/insects10010012.
Failure of the queen is often identified as a leading cause of honey bee colony mortality. However, the factors that can contribute to "queen failure" are poorly defined and often misunderstood. We studied one specific sign attributed to queen failure: poor brood pattern. In 2016 and 2017, we identified pairs of colonies with "good" and "poor" brood patterns in commercial beekeeping operations and used standard metrics to assess queen and colony health. We found no queen quality measures reliably associated with poor-brood colonies. In the second year (2017), we exchanged queens between colony pairs ( = 21): a queen from a poor-brood colony was introduced into a good-brood colony and vice versa. We observed that brood patterns of queens originally from poor-brood colonies significantly improved after placement into a good-brood colony after 21 days, suggesting factors other than the queen contributed to brood pattern. Our study challenges the notion that brood pattern alone is sufficient to judge queen quality. Our results emphasize the challenges in determining the root source for problems related to the queen when assessing honey bee colony health.
蜂王衰弱常常被视为蜜蜂蜂群死亡的主要原因。然而,导致“蜂王衰弱”的因素却定义模糊且常被误解。我们研究了一种归因于蜂王衰弱的特定迹象:不良的育虫模式。在2016年和2017年,我们在商业养蜂场中找出了具有“良好”和“不良”育虫模式的蜂群对,并使用标准指标来评估蜂王和蜂群的健康状况。我们发现没有任何蜂王质量指标与育虫不良的蜂群有可靠关联。在第二年(2017年),我们在蜂群对之间交换了蜂王(n = 21):将来自育虫不良蜂群的蜂王引入育虫良好的蜂群,反之亦然。我们观察到,原本来自育虫不良蜂群的蜂王在放入育虫良好的蜂群21天后,其育虫模式显著改善,这表明除蜂王之外的其他因素对育虫模式有影响。我们的研究对仅依据育虫模式来判断蜂王质量的观念提出了挑战。我们的结果强调了在评估蜜蜂蜂群健康状况时,确定与蜂王相关问题的根源所面临的挑战。