Social Determinants of Health Research Center, Lorestan University of Medical Sciences, Khorramabad, Iran.
Department of Health Sciences (DISSAL), School of Public Health, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy.
Health Res Policy Syst. 2019 Jan 9;17(1):3. doi: 10.1186/s12961-018-0399-5.
Policy- and decision-makers seek to improve the quality of care in the health sector and therefore aim to improve quality through appropriate policies. Higher quality of care will satisfy service providers and the public, reduce costs, increase productivity, and lead to better organisational performance. Clinical governance is a method through which management can be improved and made more accountable, and leads to the provision of better quality of care. In November 2009, the Iranian Ministry of Health and Medical Education implemented new clinical guidelines to standardise and improve clinical services as well as to increase efficiency and reduce costs. The purpose of this study was to assess the challenges of implementing clinical governance through a meta-synthesis of qualitative studies published in Iran.
Ten databases, including ISI/Web of Sciences, PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, the Cochrane Library, CINAHL, Scopus, Barakatns, MagIran and the Scientific Information Database, were searched between January 2009 and May 2018. The quality of the included studies was assessed using the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme tool. This study was reported according to the Enhancing Transparency in Reporting the Synthesis of Qualitative Research guidelines. Thematic synthesis was used to analyse the data.
Ten studies were selected and included based on the inclusion/exclusion criteria. In the first stage, 75 items emerged and were coded, and, following comparison and combination of the codes, 32 codes and 8 themes were finally extracted. These themes included health system structure, management, person-power, cultural factors, information and data, resources, education and evaluation.
The findings of the study showed that there exist a variety of challenges for the implementation of clinical governance in Iran. To successfully implement a health policy, its infrastructure needs to be created. Using the views and support of stakeholders can ensure that a policy is well implemented.
CRD42017079077 . Dated October 10, 2017.
政策制定者和决策者寻求改善卫生部门的医疗质量,因此旨在通过适当的政策提高质量。更高的医疗质量将使服务提供者和公众满意,降低成本,提高生产力,并带来更好的组织绩效。临床治理是一种通过管理来提高和使其更负责任的方法,并导致提供更好的医疗质量。2009 年 11 月,伊朗卫生部和医疗教育部实施了新的临床指南,以规范和改善临床服务,提高效率,降低成本。本研究的目的是通过对在伊朗发表的定性研究的元综合评估,评估实施临床治理的挑战。
2009 年 1 月至 2018 年 5 月,在包括 ISI/Web of Sciences、PubMed/MEDLINE、Embase、PsycINFO、Cochrane Library、CINAHL、Scopus、Barakatns、MagIran 和 Scientific Information Database 在内的 10 个数据库中进行了检索。使用批判性评估技能计划工具评估纳入研究的质量。本研究根据提高定性研究综合报告透明度指南进行了报告。采用主题综合分析方法对数据进行分析。
根据纳入/排除标准,选择并纳入了 10 项研究。在第一阶段,出现了 75 个项目并进行了编码,并且在比较和组合代码之后,最终提取了 32 个代码和 8 个主题。这些主题包括卫生系统结构、管理、人员力量、文化因素、信息和数据、资源、教育和评估。
研究结果表明,伊朗在实施临床治理方面存在各种挑战。为了成功实施一项卫生政策,需要创建其基础设施。利用利益相关者的意见和支持可以确保政策得到很好的实施。
CRD42017079077。日期为 2017 年 10 月 10 日。