Suppr超能文献

重新思考临床治理:医疗保健专业人员的观点:一项德尔菲研究。

Rethinking clinical governance: healthcare professionals' views: a Delphi study.

作者信息

Veenstra Gepke L, Ahaus Kees, Welker Gera A, Heineman Erik, van der Laan Maarten J, Muntinghe Friso L H

机构信息

Centre of Expertise on Quality and Safety, University of Groningen, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.

Faculty of Economics and Business, Department Operations, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2017 Jan 12;7(1):e012591. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012591.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Although the guiding principle of clinical governance states that healthcare professionals are the leading contributors to quality and safety in healthcare, little is known about what healthcare professionals perceive as important for clinical governance. The aim of this study is to clarify this by exploring healthcare professionals' views on clinical governance.

DESIGN

Based on a literature search, a list of 99 elements related to clinical governance was constructed. This list was refined, extended and restricted during a three-round Delphi study.

SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS

The panel of experts was formed of 24 healthcare professionals from an academic hospital that is seen as a leader in terms of its clinical governance expertise in the Netherlands.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Rated importance of each element on a four-point scale.

RESULTS

The 50 elements that the panel perceived as most important related to adopting a bottom-up approach to clinical governance, ownership, teamwork, learning from mistakes and feedback. The panel did not reach a consensus concerning elements that referred to patient involvement. Elements that referred to a managerial approach to clinical governance and standardisation of work were rejected by the panel.

CONCLUSIONS

In the views of the panel of experts, clinical governance is a practice-based, value-driven approach that has the goal of delivering the highest possible quality care and ensuring the safety of patients. Bottom-up approaches and effective teamwork are seen as crucial for high quality and safe healthcare. Striving for high quality and safe healthcare is underpinned by continuous learning, shared responsibility and good relationships and collaboration between healthcare professionals, managers and patients.

摘要

目的

尽管临床治理的指导原则表明医疗保健专业人员是医疗保健质量和安全的主要贡献者,但对于医疗保健专业人员认为对临床治理重要的因素却知之甚少。本研究的目的是通过探索医疗保健专业人员对临床治理的看法来阐明这一点。

设计

基于文献检索,构建了一份与临床治理相关的99个要素的清单。在三轮德尔菲研究中对该清单进行了完善、扩展和限制。

设置与参与者

专家小组由来自荷兰一家学术医院的24名医疗保健专业人员组成,该医院在临床治理专业知识方面被视为领导者。

主要观察指标

在四点量表上对每个要素的重要性进行评分。

结果

专家小组认为最重要的50个要素与采用自下而上的临床治理方法、自主权、团队合作、从错误中学习和反馈有关。专家小组在涉及患者参与的要素上未达成共识。专家小组拒绝了涉及临床治理管理方法和工作标准化的要素。

结论

在专家小组看来,临床治理是一种基于实践、价值驱动的方法,其目标是提供尽可能高的医疗质量并确保患者安全。自下而上的方法和有效的团队合作对于高质量和安全的医疗保健至关重要。追求高质量和安全的医疗保健的基础是持续学习、共同责任以及医疗保健专业人员、管理人员和患者之间良好的关系与合作。

相似文献

1
Rethinking clinical governance: healthcare professionals' views: a Delphi study.
BMJ Open. 2017 Jan 12;7(1):e012591. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012591.
2
Defining Resilience for Healthcare Professionals- a Delphi Study.
Contemp Nurse. 2023 Dec;59(6):422-433. doi: 10.1080/10376178.2023.2285769. Epub 2024 Jan 17.
3
Learning from people with long-term conditions: new insights for governance in primary healthcare.
Health Soc Care Community. 2014 Jul;22(4):405-16. doi: 10.1111/hsc.12097. Epub 2014 Feb 24.
5
Policy priorities in diabetes care: a Delphi study.
Qual Health Care. 1996 Mar;5(1):3-8. doi: 10.1136/qshc.5.1.3.
7
Health professionals' experience of teamwork education in acute hospital settings: a systematic review of qualitative literature.
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Apr;14(4):96-137. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-1843.
8
Patient-mediated interventions to improve professional practice.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Sep 11;9(9):CD012472. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012472.pub2.

引用本文的文献

3
British Society of Gastroenterology guidelines on sedation in gastrointestinal endoscopy.
Gut. 2024 Jan 5;73(2):219-245. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2023-330396.
4
Development of a tool to assess environmental factors to support home care - a Delphi study.
BMC Geriatr. 2023 Aug 21;23(1):501. doi: 10.1186/s12877-023-04207-3.
6
Grounded accountability in life-and-death high-consequence healthcare settings.
J Health Organ Manag. 2021 Aug 24;ahead-of-print(ahead-of-print):228-44. doi: 10.1108/JHOM-03-2021-0116.
7
Understanding how and why audits work in improving the quality of hospital care: A systematic realist review.
PLoS One. 2021 Mar 31;16(3):e0248677. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0248677. eCollection 2021.
9
Mapping clinical governance to practitioner roles and responsibilities.
J Health Organ Manag. 2020 Dec 18;ahead-of-print(ahead-of-print):18-33. doi: 10.1108/JHOM-02-2020-0065.
10
Current Practices and Existing Gaps of Continuing Medical Education among Resident Physicians in Abha City, Saudi Arabia.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Nov 16;17(22):8483. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17228483.

本文引用的文献

1
Quality management and perceptions of teamwork and safety climate in European hospitals.
Int J Qual Health Care. 2015 Dec;27(6):499-506. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzv079. Epub 2015 Oct 6.
2
Supporting and activating clinical governance development in Ireland: sharing our learning.
J Health Organ Manag. 2015;29(4):455-81. doi: 10.1108/JHOM-03-2014-0046.
3
Challenges in achieving patient participation: A review of how patient participation is addressed in empirical studies.
Int J Nurs Stud. 2015 Sep;52(9):1525-38. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2015.04.008. Epub 2015 May 1.
4
Are some health professionals more cognizant of clinical governance development concepts than others? Findings from a New Zealand study.
J Public Health (Oxf). 2016 Jun;38(2):363-70. doi: 10.1093/pubmed/fdv045. Epub 2015 Apr 12.
7
The investigators reflect: what we have learned from the Deepening our Understanding of Quality Improvement in Europe (DUQuE) study.
Int J Qual Health Care. 2014 Apr;26 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):2-4. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzu024. Epub 2014 Mar 18.
8
Leadership, safety climate, and continuous quality improvement: impact on process quality and patient safety.
Health Care Manage Rev. 2015 Jan-Mar;40(1):24-34. doi: 10.1097/HMR.0000000000000006.
9
Predictors of health care professionals' attitudes towards involvement in safety-relevant behaviours.
J Eval Clin Pract. 2014 Feb;20(1):12-9. doi: 10.1111/jep.12073. Epub 2013 Aug 13.
10
"A manager in the minds of doctors:" a comparison of new modes of control in European hospitals.
BMC Health Serv Res. 2013 Jul 2;13:246. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-13-246.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验