Suppr超能文献

比较 GeneXpert MRSA/SA ETA 检测与半定量和定量培养以及基于基因的 qPCR 检测在气管抽吸样本中的检测。

Comparison of GeneXpert MRSA/SA ETA assay with semi-quantitative and quantitative cultures and gene-based qPCR for detection of in endotracheal aspirate samples.

机构信息

1Laboratory of Medical Microbiology, Vaccine & Infectious Disease Institute, University of Antwerp, Universiteitsplein 1, D.S.6.23, 2610 Wilrijk, Belgium.

2MedImmune, Gaithersburg, USA.

出版信息

Antimicrob Resist Infect Control. 2019 Jan 5;8:4. doi: 10.1186/s13756-018-0460-8. eCollection 2019.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

is a common cause of ventilator-associated pneumonia. Rapid and accurate detection of lower respiratory tract colonization and/or infection with may inform targeted preventive and therapeutic strategies. To investigate this, we compared semi-quantitative (SQ)-culture results from 79 endotracheal aspirates (ETA) collected from mechanically-ventilated patients, to two culture and two non-culture-based methods for detection of .

METHODS

ETA analyzed by routine SQ-culture on blood and colistin-nalidixic-acid agar was compared to: (i) quantitative (Q-) culture on chromogenic COLOREX™ Staph aureus; (ii) enrichment in brain-heart-infusion broth followed by plating on blood agar and COLOREX™; (iii) -based TaqMan qPCR, and (iv) GeneXpert MRSA/SA ETA assay.

RESULTS

Of the 79 ETA samples analyzed by SQ-culture, 39 samples were positive, and 40 negative for . Two samples negative for by SQ-culture were, however, -positive by the other four methods and were considered positive. Appending these two samples as positive in the SQ-culture results, sensitivities-specificities for Q-culture, enrichment-culture, TaqMan qPCR and GeneXpert were 100-95, 100-92, 100-53% and 100% - 100, respectively. The lower specificities of Q-culture, enrichment-culture, and TaqMan qPCR was because of their higher sensitivities, although TaqMan qPCR also detected -specific extracellular DNA.

CONCLUSION

This first evaluation of the GeneXpert MRSA/SA ETA assay with ETA samples found it to be highly sensitive, specific, user-friendly (hands-on time ~ 5 min.), and rapid (~ 66 min. assay time). Where this equipment is not available, we recommend implementing more sensitive culture-based methods for improved detection in ETA samples.

摘要

介绍

是呼吸机相关性肺炎的常见原因。快速准确地检测下呼吸道定植和/或感染 可以为有针对性的预防和治疗策略提供信息。为了研究这一点,我们比较了 79 份机械通气患者的气管内抽吸物(ETA)的半定量(SQ)培养结果,与两种培养和两种非培养方法检测 。

方法

对血液和黏菌素-萘啶酸琼脂上的常规 SQ 培养的 ETA 进行分析,与以下方法进行比较:(i)显色 COLOREX™金黄色葡萄球菌上的定量(Q-)培养;(ii)在脑心浸液肉汤中富集,然后在血琼脂和 COLOREX™平板上接种;(iii)基于 TaqMan qPCR 的检测,和(iv)GeneXpert MRSA/SA ETA 检测。

结果

在通过 SQ 培养分析的 79 个 ETA 样本中,39 个样本为阳性,40 个样本为阴性。然而,两个通过 SQ 培养为阴性的样本通过其他四种方法均为阳性,并被认为是阳性。将这两个样本添加到 SQ 培养结果中为阳性,Q-培养、富集培养、TaqMan qPCR 和 GeneXpert 的灵敏度-特异性分别为 100-95、100-92、100-53%和 100%–100%。Q-培养、富集培养和 TaqMan qPCR 的特异性较低是因为它们的灵敏度较高,尽管 TaqMan qPCR 也检测到 特异性细胞外 DNA。

结论

这是首次对 ETA 样本中的 GeneXpert MRSA/SA ETA 检测进行评估,发现该检测具有高度的敏感性、特异性、用户友好性(操作时间约 5 分钟)和快速性(~66 分钟。检测时间)。在没有这种设备的情况下,我们建议实施更敏感的基于培养的方法,以提高 ETA 样本中 的检测。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bc5a/6321727/71ea908005bb/13756_2018_460_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验