Kendall C
Department of International Health, School of Hygiene and Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21205.
Soc Sci Med. 1988;27(1):17-23. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(88)90160-8.
International public health scientists have debated the distinction of selective and integrated primary health care since the development of new selective primary health care interventions such as the Expanded Programme on Immunizations and the Diarrhoeal Disease Control Programme of the World Health Organization were developed. This paper argues that the codification offered by the identification of two incompatible paradigms is not a productive one for describing the implementation of national-level primary health care programs. This paper will explore these concerns by reviewing case materials of the implementation of a diarrheal diseases control program in Honduras.
自世界卫生组织的扩大免疫规划和腹泻病控制规划等新的选择性初级卫生保健干预措施出现以来,国际公共卫生科学家一直在争论选择性初级卫生保健和综合性初级卫生保健的区别。本文认为,通过确定两种不相容的范式来进行编纂,对于描述国家级初级卫生保健项目的实施并非是一种有效的方式。本文将通过回顾洪都拉斯腹泻病控制项目实施的案例材料来探讨这些问题。