Department of Neurology, Medical Faculty, University of Duesseldorf, Moorenstr, 5, 40225, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Southwestern Medical Center, University of Texas, Dallas, TX, USA.
J Neurovirol. 2019 Apr;25(2):174-182. doi: 10.1007/s13365-018-0701-x. Epub 2019 Jan 9.
Modern antiretroviral combination therapy (cART) has transformed HIV from a life-threatening infection into a chronic disease. However, the life-long treatment has side effects that frequently have a negative impact on patients' quality of life. Thus, there are some efforts to "simplify" therapy, i.e. apply regimens with three or fewer antiretroviral substances. However, neurologists are relatively sceptical towards this cART "simplification", because the capacity of simplified regimens to access the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) might be too weak to effectively suppress viral load in this compartment. Thus, data of a big Neuro-AIDS cohort of 4992 HIV-positive patients consecutively recruited over three decades were retrospectively analysed in terms of neurocognitive performance of patients switched to simplified therapy regimens. To test whether simplified drug regimens result in new neuropsychological deficits or the worsening of pre-existing ones in HIV+ patients. Three groups of HIV+ patients were switched from triple therapy to three different two drug regimens (n = 177 to lamivudine/PI, n = 37 to INI/PI, and n = 303 to dual PI); three other groups of patients put from one to an alternative triple combination (n = 290 ABC/3TC/PI, n = 244 TDF/FTC/PI, and n = 158 TDF/FTC/NNRTI) for whatever reason served as controls. All patients were followed up over 4 years maximum. Every patient group improved immunologically and virologically after the switch. However, patients who switched to INI/PI combinations remained stable in neuropsychological tests, while a considerable percentage of patients who switched to other treatments demonstrated a decline. Remarkably, a high percentage of the patients switched to "simplified drug regimens" was not well-controlled virologically before the switch. HIV-positive patients with simplified therapy regimens show some benefit in terms of systemic infection surrogate markers (CD4 ± cell count and plasma viral load); however, neurocognitive deficits do not improve, but remain stable in most cases.
现代抗逆转录病毒联合疗法(cART)已经将 HIV 从一种危及生命的感染转变为一种慢性疾病。然而,长期的治疗会产生副作用,经常对患者的生活质量产生负面影响。因此,人们正在努力“简化”治疗,即应用含有三种或更少抗逆转录病毒药物的方案。然而,神经科医生对这种 cART“简化”持相对怀疑态度,因为简化方案进入脑脊液(CSF)的能力可能太弱,无法有效抑制该部位的病毒载量。因此,回顾性分析了过去三十年连续招募的 4992 名 HIV 阳性患者的大型神经艾滋病队列的数据,以评估患者切换至简化治疗方案后的神经认知表现。以测试简化药物方案是否会导致 HIV+患者出现新的神经心理缺陷或原有缺陷的恶化。将三组 HIV+患者从三联疗法切换为三种不同的二药方案(n=177 例至拉米夫定/PI,n=37 例至 INI/PI,n=303 例至双 PI);另有三组患者因任何原因将一种三联组合换成另一种(n=290 例 ABC/3TC/PI,n=244 例 TDF/FTC/PI,n=158 例 TDF/FTC/NNRTI)作为对照。所有患者的随访时间最长为 4 年。每个患者组在转换后都在免疫和病毒学方面得到了改善。然而,切换到 INI/PI 组合的患者在神经心理测试中保持稳定,而切换到其他治疗的患者中有相当比例的患者表现出下降。值得注意的是,切换到“简化药物方案”的患者中,有很大一部分在切换前病毒学控制不佳。接受简化治疗方案的 HIV 阳性患者在全身感染替代标志物(CD4+细胞计数和血浆病毒载量)方面显示出一些益处;然而,神经认知缺陷并没有改善,在大多数情况下仍然保持稳定。