RAND Corporation, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, California.
Health Serv Res. 2019 Feb;54 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):287-296. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.13106. Epub 2019 Jan 9.
To investigate whether health care experiences of adult Medicaid beneficiaries differ by race/ethnicity and rural/urban status.
A total of 270 243 respondents to the 2014-2015 Nationwide Adult Medicaid Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems Survey.
Linear regression was used to estimate case mix adjusted differences in patient experience between racial/ethnic minority and non-Hispanic white Medicaid beneficiaries, and between beneficiaries residing in small urban areas, small towns, and rural areas vs large urban areas. Dependent measures included getting needed care, getting care quickly, doctor communication, and customer service.
Compared with white beneficiaries, American Indian/Alaska Native (AIAN) and Asian/Pacific Islander (API) beneficiaries reported worse experiences, while black beneficiaries reported better experiences. Deficits for AIAN beneficiaries were 6-8 points on a 0-100 scale; deficits for API beneficiaries were 13-22 points (P's < 0.001); advantages for black beneficiaries were 3-5 points (P's < 0.001). Hispanic white differences were mixed. Beneficiaries in small urban areas, small towns, and isolated rural areas reported significantly better experiences (2-3 points) than beneficiaries in large urban areas (P's < 0.05), particularly regarding access to care. Racial/ethnic differences typically did not vary by geography.
Improving experiences for racial/ethnic minorities and individuals living in large urban areas should be high priorities for policy makers exploring approaches to improve the value and delivery of care to Medicaid beneficiaries.
调查成年医疗补助受益人(Medicaid Beneficiaries)的医疗保健体验是否因种族/民族和城乡状况而异。
2014-2015 年全国成年医疗补助消费者医疗服务提供者和系统评估调查(Nationwide Adult Medicaid Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems Survey)共有 270243 名受访者。
线性回归用于估计少数民族和非西班牙裔白人医疗补助受益人的病例组合调整后患者体验差异,以及居住在小城市、小镇和农村地区与大城市地区的受益人的差异。依赖指标包括获得所需护理、快速获得护理、医生沟通和客户服务。
与白人受益人相比,美国印第安人/阿拉斯加原住民(AIAN)和亚洲/太平洋岛民(API)受益人的体验较差,而黑人受益人的体验较好。AIAN 受益人的得分差距为 6-8 分(0-100 分制);API 受益人的得分差距为 13-22 分(P<0.001);黑人受益人的得分优势为 3-5 分(P<0.001)。西班牙裔白人的差异则各不相同。居住在小城市、小镇和偏远农村地区的受益人的体验明显优于居住在大城市地区的受益人的体验(2-3 分)(P<0.05),尤其是在获得护理方面。种族/民族差异通常不受地理位置的影响。
对于政策制定者来说,改善少数民族和居住在大城市地区的个人的体验应该是优先考虑的事项,他们正在探索改善医疗补助受益人的医疗价值和服务提供的方法。