Department of Restorative Dentistry, University at Buffalo School of Dental Medicine, Buffalo, NY.
Department of Biostatistics, The State University of New York, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY.
J Prosthodont. 2019 Dec;28(9):1005-1010. doi: 10.1111/jopr.13014. Epub 2019 Jan 22.
To evaluate the impact of fabrication technique on the marginal fit and resistance of lithium disilicate crowns.
Twelve ivorine molars were prepared to receive lithium disilicate crowns. The preparations were digitally recorded using an intraoral scanner, and the crowns were designed following the anatomy of an unprepared tooth using a design software. The designed crowns were fabricated using 3 techniques: (1) milling from lithium disilicate blocks using a 3-axis milling machine (3XM), (2) milling from lithium disilicate blocks using a 5-axis milling machine (5XM), and (3) milling from resin-wax billet using a 5-axis milling machine, followed by heat-pressing the pattern into lithium disilicate (5XWP). For the control group, the wax patterns were fabricated by one lab technician, and the crowns were fabricated by heat-pressing the pattern into lithium disilicate (CWP). After sintering, the crowns were secured on their associated preparations using an elastomeric material. The marginal gap of each crown was then measured at 14 defined locations through analyses of 20× images captured with a stereomicroscope. The marginal integrity and resistance to rotation of each crown were assessed by 2 calibrated practitioners. Differences in outcomes by fabrication technique were assessed using Wilcoxon, Kruskal Wallis, and Fisher's exact tests, as appropriate (α = 0.05).
Crowns fabricated using digital workflows (3XM, 5XM, 5XWP) had significantly smaller mean marginal gaps compared to the CWP group (p = 0.0001, p = 0.0002, p = 0.0001, respectively); however, 3XM group was the only group to exhibit significantly better marginal integrity than the CWP group (p = 0.0004). No significant difference (p = 0.6004) in the resistance to rotation of crowns was observed between groups.
Choice of fabrication technique and instrument may impact the marginal discrepancy of lithium disilicate crowns; however, all fabrication techniques analyzed produced crowns with acceptable marginal discrepancies.
评估制作技术对二硅酸锂全瓷冠边缘适合性和抗旋转能力的影响。
对 12 颗象牙磨牙进行预备以接收二硅酸锂全瓷冠。使用口内扫描仪对预备体进行数字化记录,然后使用设计软件根据未经预备的牙齿解剖结构设计牙冠。使用 3 种技术制造设计的牙冠:(1)使用三轴铣床(3XM)从二硅酸锂块铣削,(2)使用五轴铣床(5XM)从二硅酸锂块铣削,以及(3)使用五轴铣床从树脂蜡坯料铣削,然后将模型热压成二硅酸锂(5XWP)。对于对照组,蜡型由一名实验室技术员制作,然后将模型热压成二硅酸锂(CWP)。烧结后,使用弹性体材料将牙冠固定在相应的预备体上。然后使用立体显微镜拍摄的 20×图像分析在 14 个定义的位置测量每个牙冠的边缘间隙。由 2 名经过校准的医生评估每个牙冠的边缘完整性和抗旋转能力。使用 Wilcoxon、Kruskal Wallis 和 Fisher 精确检验评估不同制作技术之间的结果差异,具体取决于情况(α=0.05)。
使用数字工作流程(3XM、5XM、5XWP)制造的牙冠的平均边缘间隙明显小于 CWP 组(p=0.0001,p=0.0002,p=0.0001,分别);然而,3XM 组是唯一表现出明显优于 CWP 组的边缘完整性的组(p=0.0004)。各组牙冠的抗旋转能力无显著差异(p=0.6004)。
制作技术和仪器的选择可能会影响二硅酸锂全瓷冠的边缘差异;然而,分析的所有制作技术都产生了具有可接受的边缘差异的牙冠。