Yagci Gozde, Yakut Yavuz
1 Faculty of Health Sciences, School of Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation Sciences, Orthotics and Biomechanics Department, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey.
2 Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation Department, Hasan Kalyoncu University, Gaziantep, Turkey.
Prosthet Orthot Int. 2019 Jun;43(3):301-308. doi: 10.1177/0309364618820144. Epub 2019 Jan 10.
There are several kinds of scoliosis-specific and general physiotherapeutic exercise methods used in scoliosis rehabilitation. But there is need for comparable studies on the effectiveness of different exercise approaches for the treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.
Comparison of the effects of combined core stabilization exercise and bracing treatment with Scientific Exercises Approach to Scoliosis and bracing treatment in patients with moderate adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.
Thirty females with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis, who have moderate curves (20°-45°), were randomly divided into two groups. In addition to brace wearing for 4 months, one group received core stabilization exercise therapy, while the other received scientific exercises approach to scoliosis exercise therapy. The outcome measures were based on Cobb angle, angle of trunk rotation, body symmetry, cosmetic trunk deformity, and quality of life.
Thoracic and lumbar Cobb angles and trunk rotation angles, body symmetry, and cosmetic trunk deformity improved for both groups. Quality of life did not change in either group. The pain domain of the Scoliosis Research Society-22 questionnaire improved in the core stabilization group only.
Both treatment conditions including core stabilization with bracing and scientific exercises approach to scoliosis with bracing had similar effects in the short-term treatment of moderate adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.
This study showed that when scientific exercises approach to scoliosis (SEAS) and core stabilization (CS) exercises were administered with equal intensity, the effects of the two treatment protocols including CS and bracing and SEAS and bracing were similar in the treatment of patients with moderate adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS).
脊柱侧弯康复中使用了多种针对脊柱侧弯的特定和一般物理治疗运动方法。但对于不同运动方法治疗青少年特发性脊柱侧弯的有效性,需要进行对比研究。
比较核心稳定运动联合支具治疗与脊柱侧弯科学运动方法联合支具治疗对中度青少年特发性脊柱侧弯患者的效果。
30名患有中度脊柱侧弯(20°-45°)的青少年特发性脊柱侧弯女性患者被随机分为两组。除佩戴支具4个月外,一组接受核心稳定运动疗法,另一组接受脊柱侧弯科学运动疗法。结果测量基于Cobb角、躯干旋转角度、身体对称性、躯干外观畸形和生活质量。
两组的胸腰段Cobb角、躯干旋转角度、身体对称性和躯干外观畸形均有所改善。两组的生活质量均未改变。仅核心稳定组的脊柱侧弯研究协会-22问卷疼痛领域有所改善。
在中度青少年特发性脊柱侧弯的短期治疗中,包括核心稳定联合支具治疗和脊柱侧弯科学运动方法联合支具治疗的两种治疗方案效果相似。
本研究表明,当脊柱侧弯科学运动方法(SEAS)和核心稳定(CS)运动以相同强度进行时,包括CS联合支具和SEAS联合支具的两种治疗方案在治疗中度青少年特发性脊柱侧弯(AIS)患者时效果相似。