• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

性与关系满意度:感知(非)问题性性欲望差异在男同性恋和异性恋男性中的作用。

Sexual and Relationship Satisfaction: The Role of Perceived (Non)problematic Sexual Desire Discrepancy in Gay and Heterosexual Men.

机构信息

a School of Psychology , University of Minho , Braga , Portugal.

b School of Psychology , University of Minho, CIPSI-Research Center on Psychology , Braga , Portugal.

出版信息

J Sex Marital Ther. 2019;45(2):103-113. doi: 10.1080/0092623X.2018.1488323. Epub 2019 Jan 10.

DOI:10.1080/0092623X.2018.1488323
PMID:30628560
Abstract

Sexual desire discrepancy has been associated with sexual and relationship dissatisfaction. Nonetheless, little is known regarding the role of desire discrepancy in gay men, as main research has been systematically conducted with heterosexual couples. Also, only one study has focused on problematic sexual desire discrepancies and sexual satisfaction with lesbian women. This study sought to understand if perceived sexual desire discrepancy influences sexual and relationship satisfaction in men, and to explore differences according to sexual orientation. A total of 346 men (245 heterosexual and 101 gay) completed an online survey and answered sociodemographic questions, a specific question about sexual desire discrepancy, and completed the Global Measure of Sexual Satisfaction and the Global Measure of Relationship Satisfaction. The main findings showed differences in sexual and relationship satisfaction according to sexual desire discrepancy groups, with men who experienced no desire discrepancy being more satisfied within their relationship and sex life compared to men who experienced both problematic and nonproblematic sexual desire discrepancy. Additionally, men who experienced nonproblematic sexual desire discrepancy reported being more sexually and relationship satisfied than men who experienced problematic sexual desire discrepancy. No sexual orientation differences were found. Overall, current findings emphasize the role of (non)problematic desire discrepancy in sexual and relationship satisfaction among heterosexual and gay men.

摘要

性欲望差异与性和关系不满有关。然而,对于男同性恋者的欲望差异的作用知之甚少,因为主要的研究是系统地与异性恋夫妇进行的。此外,只有一项研究关注有问题的性欲望差异和女同性恋者的性满意度。本研究旨在了解感知到的性欲望差异是否会影响男性的性和关系满意度,并探讨性取向的差异。共有 346 名男性(245 名异性恋者和 101 名同性恋者)完成了在线调查,回答了社会人口学问题、一个关于性欲望差异的具体问题,以及完成了全球性行为满意度量表和全球关系满意度量表。主要发现表明,根据性欲望差异群体,性和关系满意度存在差异,与经历过性欲望差异的男性相比,没有性欲望差异的男性在他们的关系和性生活中更满意。此外,经历过非问题性性欲望差异的男性报告说,他们的性和关系满意度高于经历过问题性性欲望差异的男性。没有发现性取向的差异。总的来说,目前的研究结果强调了(非)问题性欲望差异在异性恋和男同性恋者的性和关系满意度中的作用。

相似文献

1
Sexual and Relationship Satisfaction: The Role of Perceived (Non)problematic Sexual Desire Discrepancy in Gay and Heterosexual Men.性与关系满意度:感知(非)问题性性欲望差异在男同性恋和异性恋男性中的作用。
J Sex Marital Ther. 2019;45(2):103-113. doi: 10.1080/0092623X.2018.1488323. Epub 2019 Jan 10.
2
Sexual Satisfaction, Solitary, and Dyadic Sexual Desire in Men According to Sexual Orientation.根据性取向对男性性满意度、孤独及二元性欲的研究
J Homosex. 2019;66(6):769-779. doi: 10.1080/00918369.2018.1484231. Epub 2018 Jun 19.
3
Using Emotionally Focused Therapy to Treat Sexual Desire Discrepancy in Couples.运用情感焦点疗法治疗夫妻间的性欲望差异。
J Sex Marital Ther. 2017 Nov 17;43(8):720-735. doi: 10.1080/0092623X.2016.1263703. Epub 2016 Nov 28.
4
Distressing Sexual Problems and Dyadic Adjustment in Heterosexuals, Gay Men, and Lesbian Women.异性恋者、男同性恋者和女同性恋者中令人苦恼的性问题及夫妻关系调适
J Sex Marital Ther. 2016 May 18;42(4):369-81. doi: 10.1080/0092623X.2015.1053020. Epub 2015 May 26.
5
Gender differences in desire discrepancy as a predictor of sexual and relationship satisfaction in a college sample of heterosexual romantic relationships.在一项针对大学生异性恋情侣的研究中,欲望差异的性别差异可预测性和关系满意度。
J Sex Marital Ther. 2012;38(2):198-215. doi: 10.1080/0092623X.2011.606877.
6
Automatic Thoughts During Sexual Activity, Distressing Sexual Symptoms, and Sexual Orientation: Findings from a Web Survey.性活动中的自动思维、令人苦恼的性症状与性取向:一项网络调查的结果
J Sex Marital Ther. 2016 Oct 2;42(7):616-34. doi: 10.1080/0092623X.2015.1113583. Epub 2015 Nov 16.
7
Body image satisfaction in heterosexual, gay, and lesbian adults.异性恋、男同性恋和女同性恋成年人的身体意象满意度。
Arch Sex Behav. 2009 Oct;38(5):713-25. doi: 10.1007/s10508-008-9378-1. Epub 2008 Aug 19.
8
An Interpersonal Investigation of Sexual Self-Schemas.性自我图式的人际调查
Arch Sex Behav. 2016 Feb;45(2):281-90. doi: 10.1007/s10508-015-0638-6. Epub 2015 Nov 6.
9
Sexual satisfaction and desire discrepancy in same sex women's relationships.同性女性关系中的性满意度与欲望差异。
J Sex Marital Ther. 2007 Jan-Feb;33(1):41-53. doi: 10.1080/00926230600998466.
10
Differences in solitary and dyadic sexual desire and sexual satisfaction in heterosexual and nonheterosexual cisgender men and women.异性恋和非异性恋顺性别男性和女性的单一和二元性欲望及性满足的差异。
J Sex Med. 2023 Apr 27;20(5):597-604. doi: 10.1093/jsxmed/qdad033.

引用本文的文献

1
Sexual Satisfaction Among Sexual Minority and Heterosexual Middle-Aged and Older Adults.性少数群体及异性恋中年和老年成年人的性满意度
Innov Aging. 2023 Jan 31;7(2):igad010. doi: 10.1093/geroni/igad010. eCollection 2023.
2
Perceived Changes in Sexual Interest and Distress About Discrepant Sexual Interest During the First Phase of COVID-19 Pandemic: A Multi-Country Assessment in Cohabiting Partnered Individuals.在 COVID-19 大流行的第一阶段,同居伴侣对性兴趣变化和性兴趣差异的困扰的感知:一项多国评估。
Arch Sex Behav. 2022 Jan;51(1):231-246. doi: 10.1007/s10508-021-02279-z. Epub 2022 Jan 17.
3
Dyadic Sexual Desire in Romantic Relationships: The Dyadic Interactions Affecting Dyadic Sexual Desire Model.
浪漫关系中的对偶性性欲望:影响对偶性性欲望模型的对偶相互作用。
Arch Sex Behav. 2022 Jan;51(1):417-440. doi: 10.1007/s10508-021-02165-8. Epub 2022 Jan 15.
4
Discrepancy in Dyadic Sexual Desire Predicts Sexual Distress over Time in a Community Sample of Committed Couples: A Daily Diary and Longitudinal Study.在一个社区样本中,承诺型伴侣的对偶性性欲望差异随时间预测性困扰:一项每日日记和纵向研究。
Arch Sex Behav. 2021 Nov;50(8):3637-3649. doi: 10.1007/s10508-021-01967-0. Epub 2021 Aug 23.