Laboratory of Psychology and Ecology of Stress, Department of Psychology, Centre for Psychosocial Health, The Education University of Hong Kong.
The Jockey Club School of Public Health and Primary Care, The Chinese University of Hong Kong.
Psychol Assess. 2019 Jun;31(6):715-729. doi: 10.1037/pas0000692. Epub 2019 Jan 10.
Sustainment of daily routines requires greater psychological resilience and may lead to greater resilience in the face of stressors. Existing scales tend only to focus on emotions and engagement, rather than how well individuals sustain routine behaviors. To address this gap in the literature, we developed the Sustainability of Living Inventory (SOLI). A pool of 46 Likert-type items were developed to indicate how regularly respondents performed a variety of specific routines. Four separate study samples were collected through online surveys with community-dwelling American adults (N = 1,109). The final model evidenced excellent goodness-of-fit and consisted of 42 items, which loaded on eight dimensions: hygiene, eating, sleep, duties at home, leisure at home, exercising, social activities, and work/study involvement (α = .73-.93). These eight dimensions further loaded on two second-order factors, primary and secondary daily routines. Convergent validity was demonstrated in the correlations with Lawton Instrumental Activities of Daily Living Scale, Perceived Ability to Cope with Trauma Scale, Savoring Beliefs Inventory, and Conservation of Resources-Evaluation. Discriminant validity was demonstrated in the correlations with the List of Threatening Experiences, Life Events Checklist for DSM-5, and items on chronic financial strain. Criterion-related validity was demonstrated in the correlations with established outcome measures including State-Trait Anxiety Inventory, Patient Health Questionnaire, PTSD Checklist-Civilian Version, Positive and Negative Affect Schedule, Satisfaction with Life Scale, and Perceived Stress Scale. Incremental validity was shown in the correlations with outcome measures independent of common coping and resource variables. Implications of the SOLI on mental health screening and intervention were discussed. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2019 APA, all rights reserved).
维持日常生活需要更强的心理弹性，这可能会使个体在面对压力源时更有弹性。现有的量表往往只关注情绪和参与度，而不是个体维持日常行为的能力。为了弥补文献中的这一空白，我们开发了生活维持清单（SOLI）。一组 46 个李克特式项目被开发出来，以表明被试执行各种特定日常活动的频率。通过对美国社区居民进行的在线调查，共收集了四个独立的研究样本（N=1109）。最终模型具有极好的拟合优度，由 42 个项目组成，这些项目分为八个维度：卫生、饮食、睡眠、家务、家庭休闲、锻炼、社交活动和工作/学习参与度（α=.73-.93）。这八个维度进一步分为两个二阶因素，即主要日常活动和次要日常活动。与 Lawton 工具性日常生活活动量表、创伤后感知能力量表、享受信念量表和资源保护-评估量表的相关性证明了其收敛效度。与威胁经验清单、DSM-5 生活事件检查表和慢性财务压力项目的相关性证明了其判别效度。与包括状态-特质焦虑量表、患者健康问卷、平民版 PTSD 清单、正负情感量表、生活满意度量表和感知压力量表在内的既定结果测量的相关性证明了其效标关联效度。与独立于常见应对和资源变量的结果测量的相关性证明了其增量效度。讨论了 SOLI 在心理健康筛查和干预方面的意义。（PsycINFO 数据库记录（c）2019 APA，保留所有权利）。
