Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Zucker School of Medicine of Hofstra/Northwell, Lenox Hill Hospital, New York, NY.
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Zucker School of Medicine of Hofstra/Northwell, Lenox Hill Hospital, New York, NY.
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Jun;220(6):558-561. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2019.01.001. Epub 2019 Jan 7.
Recent changes in the culture of academic obstetrics and gynecology have increased the potential for disconnect between physicians and their patients. These changes include increased emphasis on productivity, burgeoning bureaucracies for purposes of compliance, arbitrary clinical goals such as low cesarean delivery rates, the electronic medical record, and lack of respect. These changes are predatory on professionalism when they alienate obstetrician-gynecologists from their patients. The concepts of alienated labor and non-alienated labor in the political philosophy of Karl Marx can be used to explain this alienation. We identify alienated labor by analogy to factory workers who perform routinized, thoughtless tasks for goals they do not set to create profit for others, the factory owners. We identify non-alienated labor by analogy to skilled craftsmen who use their highly advanced skills guided by deep experience to fully own the products of their labor. We then suggest that academic physicians are at increasing risk of becoming factory workers and experiencing decreased professionalism while their colleagues in private practice are better positioned to experience non-alienated labor and sustained professionalism. Based on this analysis, we propose five remedies to prevent alienated labor in academic obstetrics and gynecology: expanding the concept of rewarding productivity to include excellence in clinical care and teaching; critical appraisal of the compliance culture and the large bureaucracy it now seems to require; setting evidence-based and therefore clinically realistic goals such as a lower cesarean delivery rate; reforming the medical record to return to the original purpose of the record of promoting communication among care teams with data extraction for billing a secondary purpose; and creating an organizational culture that respects the contributions of clinical academic obstetricians to the mission of their department and medical school. We close by calling on academic leaders in the specialty to work with their clinical practice and teaching colleagues to identify and prevent alienation of labor in academic obstetrics and gynecology.
近年来,学术妇产科领域的文化发生了变化,增加了医生与其患者之间脱节的可能性。这些变化包括对生产力的日益重视,为合规目的而涌现的庞大官僚机构,任意设定的临床目标,如降低剖宫产率、电子病历以及缺乏尊重。当这些变化使妇产科医生与患者疏远时,它们就会对专业精神产生掠夺性影响。卡尔·马克思政治哲学中的异化劳动和非异化劳动概念可用于解释这种疏远。我们通过类比工厂工人来识别异化劳动,这些工人为他们没有设定的目标执行例行的、不假思索的任务,为的是为工厂主创造利润。我们通过类比熟练工匠来识别非异化劳动,这些工匠运用高度先进的技能,在丰富经验的指导下,完全拥有自己劳动的产品。然后,我们认为学术医生越来越有可能成为工厂工人,并且在专业精神方面的体验会减少,而他们在私人执业中的同事则更有机会体验非异化劳动和持续的专业精神。基于此分析,我们提出了五项防止学术妇产科中异化劳动的措施:扩大奖励生产力的概念,将卓越的临床护理和教学也包括在内;批判性评估合规文化及其现在似乎需要的庞大官僚机构;设定基于证据的、因此也是临床现实的目标,如降低剖宫产率;改革病历,回归促进护理团队之间沟通的原始记录目的,并将数据提取作为次要目的用于计费;以及营造一种尊重临床学术妇产科医生对其部门和医学院使命贡献的组织文化。最后,我们呼吁该专业的学术领导者与他们的临床实践和教学同事合作,识别和防止学术妇产科中的劳动异化。