Suppr超能文献

新加坡一站式记忆门诊中 TYM 和 RBANS 的临床效用:一项试点研究。

The Clinical Utility of the TYM and RBANS in a One-Stop Memory Clinic in Singapore: A Pilot Study.

机构信息

Alice Lee Centre for Nursing Studies, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.

Department of Medicine, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.

出版信息

J Geriatr Psychiatry Neurol. 2019 Mar;32(2):68-73. doi: 10.1177/0891988718824034. Epub 2019 Jan 10.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

We aimed to examine the discriminant validity of a brief self-administered cognitive screening test, the Test Your Memory (TYM) and a brief neuropsychological test, the Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status (RBANS), supplemented with executive and language tests (Color Trail Test [CTT] and modified Boston Naming Test [mBNT], respectively), in detecting cognitive impairment (CI) in a one-stop memory clinic in Singapore.

METHODS

Ninety patients ≥50 years old with a diagnosis of no cognitive impairment, mild cognitive impairment, and mild Alzheimer disease were recruited from memory clinic. They received the TYM, Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), RBANS, CTT, mBNT, and a gold-standard formal neuropsychological test battery.

RESULTS

The TYM had a significantly larger area under the curve (AUC) than MMSE (0.96 vs 0.88, = .03) and was equivalent to MoCA in detecting CI (0.96 vs 0.95, = .80). At the optimal cutoff points, the TYM (<38) was significantly more sensitive than the MMSE (<24) and MoCA (<20; < .001). The RBANS had an AUC equivalent to the RBANS supplemented with CTT and mBNT (0.92 vs 0.86, = .22) in detecting CI. The RBANS supplemented with CTT and mBNT was more sensitive than RBANS alone in detecting CI (sensitivity: 0.98 vs 0.93, = .016) among patients screened negative using TYM.

CONCLUSION

The self-administered TYM is superior to MMSE and equivalent to MoCA in detecting CI and could be implemented routinely. The RBANS supplemented with CTT and mBNT is more sensitive in detecting CI than RBANS alone therefore could be used for diagnostic purposes.

摘要

背景

我们旨在检验一种简短的自我管理认知筛查测试(Test Your Memory,TYM)和一种简短的神经心理学测试(Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status,RBANS)的判别有效性,这两种测试辅以执行功能和语言测试(分别为 Color Trail Test [CTT] 和改良波士顿命名测试 [mBNT]),以检测新加坡一站式记忆诊所中的认知障碍(CI)。

方法

从记忆诊所招募了 90 名年龄在 50 岁以上且被诊断为无认知障碍、轻度认知障碍和轻度阿尔茨海默病的患者。他们接受了 TYM、简易精神状态检查(MMSE)、蒙特利尔认知评估(MoCA)、RBANS、CTT、mBNT 和黄金标准的正式神经心理测试组合。

结果

TYM 的曲线下面积(AUC)明显大于 MMSE(0.96 比 0.88, =.03),且与 MoCA 检测 CI 的效果相当(0.96 比 0.95, =.80)。在最佳截断点,TYM(<38)比 MMSE(<24)和 MoCA(<20; <.001)更敏感。RBANS 与补充 CTT 和 mBNT 的 RBANS (0.92 比 0.86, =.22)在检测 CI 方面具有等效的 AUC。在 TYM 筛查阴性的患者中,RBANS 补充 CTT 和 mBNT 在检测 CI 方面比 RBANS 单独检测更敏感(敏感性:0.98 比 0.93, =.016)。

结论

自我管理的 TYM 在检测 CI 方面优于 MMSE 且与 MoCA 相当,可常规实施。补充 CTT 和 mBNT 的 RBANS 比单独使用 RBANS 更敏感,因此可用于诊断目的。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验