Department of Psychology, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, P.O.B: 953, Beer-Sheva, Israel.
Zlotowski Center for Neuroscience, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer-Sheva, Israel.
Psychon Bull Rev. 2019 Jun;26(3):790-797. doi: 10.3758/s13423-018-1556-0.
Research in cognitive psychology has focused mainly on the visual modality as the input interface for mental processes. We suggest that integrating studies from different modalities can aid in resolving theoretical controversies. We demonstrate this in the case of subitizing. Subitizing, the quick and accurate enumeration of small quantities, has been studied since the 19th century. Nevertheless, to date, the underlying mechanism is still debated. Two mechanisms have been suggested: a domain-general mechanism-attention, and a domain-specific mechanism-pattern recognition. Here, we review pivotal studies in the visual, tactile, and auditory modalities. The accumulative findings shed light on the theoretical debate. Accordingly, we suggest that subitizing is a subprocess of counting that occurs in the presence of facilitating factors, such as attentional resources and familiar patterns.
认知心理学的研究主要集中在视觉模态作为心理过程的输入接口上。我们认为,整合来自不同模态的研究可以帮助解决理论上的争议。我们在数感的案例中证明了这一点。数感是指快速准确地计数小数量的能力,自 19 世纪以来就一直在研究。然而,迄今为止,其潜在机制仍存在争议。有两种机制被提出:一种是领域一般性机制——注意力,另一种是领域特定性机制——模式识别。在这里,我们回顾了视觉、触觉和听觉模态中的关键研究。累积的发现为理论争论提供了启示。因此,我们认为数感是计数过程的一个子过程,它发生在注意力资源和熟悉模式等促进因素的存在下。