AlRahabi Mothanna K, AlKady Ayman M, Ghabbani Hani M
College of Dentistry, Taibah University, Madinah Al Munawwarah, Saudi Arabia.
Aust Endod J. 2019 Dec;45(3):346-351. doi: 10.1111/aej.12324. Epub 2019 Jan 10.
This study aimed to evaluate the agreement between faculty member assessments and student self-assessments regarding the latter's performance in a preclinical endodontic course. The data were collected from 30 undergraduate dental students enrolled in a preclinical endodontic course at Taibah University in Saudi Arabia during 2017-2018 academic year. One course coordinator calibrated the grading method and distributed it to all staff and students. Students were asked to appraise their own performance of a root canal treatment for a tooth with a single canal. After the student self-assessments, two staff members also graded student performance using the same grading scale. The assessment agreement was compared between student and faculty evaluations using a Wilcoxon signed-rank test with a 0.05 significance level. There was a significant difference (P < 0.05) between student and staff member assessment scores. Student scores were lower and had a weak reliability compared to those of staff members.
本研究旨在评估教师评估与学生自我评估之间关于学生在临床前牙髓病学课程中表现的一致性。数据收集自2017 - 2018学年在沙特阿拉伯泰巴赫大学参加临床前牙髓病学课程的30名本科牙科学生。一名课程协调员校准了评分方法并分发给所有教职员工和学生。要求学生对自己治疗单根管牙齿的根管治疗表现进行评估。在学生自我评估之后,两名教职员工也使用相同的评分量表对学生表现进行评分。使用Wilcoxon符号秩检验在0.05显著性水平下比较学生和教师评估之间的评估一致性。学生和教职员工的评估分数之间存在显著差异(P < 0.05)。与教职员工相比,学生的分数较低且可靠性较弱。