Instituto de Ciencia y Tecnología Animal,Universitat Politècnica de València,Camino de Vera, s/n 46022,Valencia,Spain.
Animal. 2019 Aug;13(8):1730-1735. doi: 10.1017/S1751731118003336. Epub 2019 Jan 11.
In dairy goats, the kid rearing system can have critical importance in financial returns. Commonly used criteria for the choice of rearing system are not always clear due to the high number of factors involved. The aim of this study was to quantify all those factors to facilitate decision making. So, the effect of two different kid rearing systems, mixed rearing system (MRS) and artificial rearing system (ARS), on milk yield, milk composition and somatic cell count (SCC), milk yield loss at weaning for MRS, kid growth and costs of the different traits on the financial returns in Murciano-Granadina breed goats was studied. Twenty-four goats per group were used. In the MRS, goats reared only one kid, which had free access to goat milk 24 h a day and were weaned at week 6 of lactation, whereas kids in the ARS were separated from their mothers at kidding, colostrum and artificially reared. In both systems, dams were machine-milked once a day throughout lactation and the records took place weekly. Potential milk yield was estimated according to the oxytocin method up to week 12 of lactation, and was similar for both rearing systems, although a 12.3% drop in potential milk yield at weaning was observed for MRS. During the first 6 weeks of lactation, marketable milk was lower for dams in MRS compared to those in ARS (72.1 v. 113.0 l), but similar for the rest of the experiment (101.5 v. 99.4 l, respectively). Marketable milk composition and SCC throughout the 12 weeks of lactation were unaffected by the rearing system. Artificial rearing system entailed an increment in production cost of 22.2€ per kid compared to the rearing by MRS. A similar economic return per goat and kid was obtained from ARS and MRS in this experiment, although, due to one herd's prolificacy of 1.8, the actual results would be 16.2€ per goat in favour of MRS. The real interest of this experiment may be the possibility of extrapolation to different flocks with diverse levels of milk production, prolificacy and prices and costs for incomes and outputs, to estimate the production system that increases returns. In conclusion, the results showed an increase in the cost of €22.2 per kid bred in the ARS, compared to the MRS, and a final return of 16.2€ per goat in favour of the mixed system.
在奶山羊中,羔羊饲养系统对财务回报可能具有重要意义。由于涉及的因素众多,通常用于选择饲养系统的标准并不总是明确。本研究的目的是量化所有这些因素,以方便决策。因此,本研究研究了两种不同的羔羊饲养系统,即混合饲养系统(MRS)和人工饲养系统(ARS)对产奶量、乳成分和体细胞计数(SCC)、MRS 断奶时的产奶量损失、羔羊生长和不同性状成本对穆尔西亚-格拉纳迪纳品种山羊的财务回报的影响。每组使用 24 只羊。在 MRS 中,每只羊只饲养一只羔羊,羔羊 24 小时自由饮用羊奶,并在哺乳期第 6 周断奶,而 ARS 中的羔羊在分娩时与母亲分开,接受初乳和人工饲养。在这两种系统中,哺乳期内,母羊每天都通过机器挤奶一次,记录每周进行一次。根据催产素法估计潜在产奶量,直到哺乳期第 12 周,两种饲养系统的潜在产奶量相似,但 MRS 断奶时潜在产奶量下降了 12.3%。在哺乳期的前 6 周,MRS 中的母羊的商品奶产量低于 ARS(72.1 升比 113.0 升),但在实验的其余时间,两者的商品奶产量相似(分别为 101.5 升和 99.4 升)。哺乳期 12 周内,商品奶成分和 SCC 不受饲养系统的影响。与 MRS 相比,人工饲养系统使每只羔羊的生产成本增加了 22.2 欧元。在本实验中,ARS 和 MRS 获得了相似的每只羊和羔羊的经济回报,但由于一个羊群的繁殖力为 1.8,实际结果将有利于 MRS,每只羊为 16.2 欧元。本实验的真正意义可能是能够推广到不同产奶量、繁殖力和价格以及收入和产出成本不同的不同羊群,以估计增加回报的生产系统。总之,结果表明,与 MRS 相比,ARS 饲养的每只羔羊的成本增加了 22.2 欧元,而混合系统每只羊的最终回报为 16.2 欧元。