1 School of Public Health and Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medicine, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, Australia.
2 Faculty of Health and Medicine, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, Australia.
Int J Stroke. 2019 Jul;14(5):460-467. doi: 10.1177/1747493018823568. Epub 2019 Jan 11.
Transient ischemic attacks are common and place patients at risk of subsequent stroke. The 2007 EXPRESS and SOS-TIA studies demonstrated the efficacy of rapid treatment initiation. We hypothesized that with these findings having informed subsequent transient ischemic attacks management protocols, transient ischemic attacks prognosis in contemporary (2008 and later) patient cohorts would be more favorable than in historical cohorts.
A systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies and randomized control trial placebo-arms of transient ischemic attack (published 2008-2015). The primary outcome was stroke. Secondary outcomes were mortality, transient ischemic attack, and myocardial infarction. Studies were excluded if the outcome of transient ischemic attack patients was not reported separately. The systematic review included all studies of transient ischemic attack. The meta-analysis excluded studies of restricted transient ischemic attack patient types (e.g. only patients with atrial fibrillation). The pooled cumulative risks of stroke recurrence were estimated from study-specific estimates at 2, 7, 30, and 90 days post-transient ischemic attack, using a multivariate Bayesian model.
We included 47 studies in the systematic review and 40 studies in the meta-analysis. In the systematic review (191,202 patients), stroke at 2 days was reported in 13/47 (27.7%) of studies, at 7 days in 20/47 (42.6%), at 30 days in 12/47 (25.5%), and at 90 days in 33/47 (70.2%). Studies included in the meta-analysis recruited 68,563 patients. The cumulative risk of stroke was 1.2% (95% credible interval (CI) 0.6-2.2), 3.4% (95% CI 2.0-5.5), 5.0% (95% CI 2.9-8.9), and 7.4% (95% CI 4.3-12.4) at 2, 7, 30, and 90 days post-transient ischemic attack, respectively.
In contemporary settings, transient ischemic attack prognosis is more favorable than reported in historical cohorts where a meta-analysis suggests stroke risk of 3.1% at two days.
短暂性脑缺血发作很常见,使患者面临随后发生中风的风险。2007 年的 EXPRESS 和 SOS-TIA 研究证明了快速治疗开始的疗效。我们假设,随着这些发现为随后的短暂性脑缺血发作管理方案提供了信息,当代(2008 年及以后)患者队列的短暂性脑缺血发作预后将比历史队列更有利。
对 2008 年至 2015 年发表的队列研究和随机对照试验安慰剂臂的短暂性脑缺血发作进行系统评价和荟萃分析。主要结局是中风。次要结局是死亡率、短暂性脑缺血发作和心肌梗死。如果未单独报告短暂性脑缺血发作患者的结局,则排除研究。系统评价包括所有短暂性脑缺血发作的研究。荟萃分析排除了限制短暂性脑缺血发作患者类型的研究(例如,仅患有心房颤动的患者)。使用多变量贝叶斯模型,从研究特定的估计值估计 2、7、30 和 90 天短暂性脑缺血发作后中风复发的累积风险。
我们在系统评价中纳入了 47 项研究,在荟萃分析中纳入了 40 项研究。在系统评价(191202 名患者)中,13/47(27.7%)的研究报告了 2 天的中风,20/47(42.6%)的研究报告了 7 天的中风,12/47(25.5%)的研究报告了 30 天的中风,33/47(70.2%)的研究报告了 90 天的中风。纳入荟萃分析的研究招募了 68563 名患者。中风的累积风险分别为 1.2%(95%可信区间(CI)0.6-2.2)、3.4%(95% CI 2.0-5.5)、5.0%(95% CI 2.9-8.9)和 7.4%(95% CI 4.3-12.4)在短暂性脑缺血发作后 2、7、30 和 90 天。
在当代环境中,短暂性脑缺血发作的预后比历史队列中报告的更为有利,荟萃分析表明,两天内中风风险为 3.1%。