Suppr超能文献

经腹膜外微创球囊填塞联合腹主动脉结部止血带与开放性填塞治疗骨盆骨折相关出血的比较:并非所有外部压迫都是平等的。

Minimally invasive preperitoneal balloon tamponade and abdominal aortic junctional tourniquet versus open packing for pelvic fracture-associated hemorrhage: Not all extrinsic compression is equal.

机构信息

From the Departments of Surgery and Clinical Investigations (W.S.D., D.M.F., R.R.S., J.B.W., M.R.B., K.K.S., G.E.B., S.R.H., M.J.E., M.J.M.), Madigan Army Medical Center, Tacoma, Washington; and Trauma and Emergency Surgery Service (M.J.M.), Legacy Emanuel Medical Center, Portland, Oregon.

出版信息

J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2019 Apr;86(4):625-634. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000002203.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Minimally invasive preperitoneal balloon tamponade (PPB) and abdominal aortic junctional tourniquets (AAJT) have been proposed as alternatives to open preperitoneal packing (OP) for the management of pelvic fracture-associated hemorrhage. We hypothesized that the PPB (SpaceMaker Pro) and AAJT would result in similar rates of survival and blood loss versus OP.

METHODS

Thirty-two swine underwent creation of a combined open-book pelvic fracture and major iliac vascular injuries. Animals were randomized to no intervention (n = 7), OP (n = 10), PPB (n = 9), or AAJT (n = 6) at a mean arterial pressure <40 mm Hg following initiation of uncontrolled hemorrhage. Survival (up to 60 minutes + 10 minutes after intervention reversal), hemodynamics, extraperitoneal pressures, blood loss, and associated complications were compared between groups.

RESULTS

Prior to injury, no difference was measured between groups for weight, hemodynamics, lactate, and hematocrit (all p > 0.05). The injury was uniformly lethal without intervention, with survival time (mean) of 5 minutes, peak preperitoneal pressure (PP) of 14 mm Hg, blood loss of 960 g, and peak lactate of 2.6 mmol/L. Survival time was 44 minutes with OP versus 60 minutes with PPB and AAJT (p < 0.01). Peak PP (mm Hg) was 19 with OP, 23 with PPB, and 23 with AAJT (p > 0.05). Blood loss (g) was 850 with OP, 930 with PPB, and 600 with AAJT (p > 0.05). Peak lactate (mmol/L) was 3.3 with OP, 4.3 with PPB, and 6.3 with AAJT (p < 0.01). Only 33% of AAJT animals survived intervention reversal versus 60% for OP and 67% for PPB (p < 0.01). Necropsy revealed bowel/bladder injury in 50% of AAJT subjects versus 0% in all other arms (p < 0.01).

CONCLUSION

Preperitoneal balloon tamponade is a safe and potentially effective alternative to OP for the management of lethal pelvic fracture-associated hemorrhage. Abdominal aortic junctional tourniquet offers a similar survival benefit to PPB but has concerning rates of ischemia-reperfusion and compressive abdominal organ injury.

摘要

背景

微创腹膜前球囊填塞(PPB)和腹主动脉交界处止血带(AAJT)已被提议作为开放式腹膜前填塞(OP)的替代方法,用于治疗骨盆骨折相关出血。我们假设 PPB(SpaceMaker Pro)和 AAJT 在生存率和失血量方面与 OP 相似。

方法

32 头猪接受了开放性耻骨联合骨折和主要髂血管损伤的联合手术。动物在开始不受控制的出血后平均动脉压<40mmHg 时随机分为无干预组(n=7)、OP 组(n=10)、PPB 组(n=9)或 AAJT 组(n=6)。在干预逆转后 60 分钟+10 分钟时比较各组的生存率(最长)、血流动力学、腹膜外压力、失血量和相关并发症。

结果

在受伤前,各组的体重、血流动力学、乳酸和血细胞比容均无差异(均 p>0.05)。没有干预的情况下,损伤是一致致命的,无干预组的存活时间(平均值)为 5 分钟,腹膜前压力(PP)峰值为 14mmHg,失血量为 960g,乳酸峰值为 2.6mmol/L。OP 组的存活时间为 44 分钟,PPB 和 AAJT 组为 60 分钟(p<0.01)。PP 峰值(mmHg)OP 组为 19mmHg,PPB 组为 23mmHg,AAJT 组为 23mmHg(p>0.05)。失血量(g)OP 组为 850g,PPB 组为 930g,AAJT 组为 600g(p>0.05)。乳酸峰值(mmol/L)OP 组为 3.3mmol/L,PPB 组为 4.3mmol/L,AAJT 组为 6.3mmol/L(p<0.01)。只有 33%的 AAJT 动物在干预逆转后存活,而 OP 组为 60%,PPB 组为 67%(p<0.01)。尸检显示 50%的 AAJT 动物有肠/膀胱损伤,而其他所有组均为 0%(p<0.01)。

结论

腹膜前球囊填塞是一种安全且可能有效的替代 OP 治疗致死性骨盆骨折相关出血的方法。腹主动脉交界处止血带在生存率方面与 PPB 相似,但缺血再灌注和压迫性腹部器官损伤的发生率较高。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验