Molecular Medicine Research Institute, 428 Oakmead Pkwy, Sunnyvale, CA, 94085, USA.
Mol Cell Endocrinol. 2019 May 1;487:94-97. doi: 10.1016/j.mce.2019.01.004. Epub 2019 Jan 8.
Several different immunoassays have been used in the commercial pharmaceutical development of serelaxin. These assays have been well validated for submission of GLP preclinical and clinical studies to the FDA and EU regulatory bodies. The requirements for these assays exceed that of most research assays commonly developed in academic research but have been and are currently available to academic researchers. Additionally, many human relaxin immunoassays are commercially available from a variety of vendors. Validation procedures for immunoassays are well understood and documented, however validation of these assays is often lacking or completely absent. The data derived from these assays must be questioned if the investigator does not supply information on the validation of the assay used, either from the supplier or through their own efforts. Many recent papers on determination of serum relaxin in clinical settings have recently been published. The assay used for this determination varies but generally is one of two commercially available. These manuscripts and the assay used is discussed. Direct comparisons of assays are lacking but some general conclusions can be drawn by comparing results from similar studies using different assays. There is disagreement among the results of the concentrations of serum relaxin from the use of different assays that raise questions on assay reliability. The differences in the quality of immunoassays used for detection of serum relaxin should be part of the decisions making process in choosing an assay. While the end user bears the ultimate responsibility to demonstrate the assay is valid for the stated claims, reviewers and editors also share responsibility for quality of published results.
已有几种不同的免疫分析方法被应用于 serelaxin 的商业药物开发。这些分析方法已经通过了 GLP 临床前和临床研究向 FDA 和欧盟监管机构提交的验证。这些分析方法的要求超过了大多数学术研究中常见的研究分析方法,但已被学术研究人员使用,并且目前仍然可用。此外,许多人类松弛素免疫分析方法可从各种供应商处获得。免疫分析方法的验证程序已经得到很好的理解和记录,然而,这些分析方法的验证往往缺乏或完全不存在。如果研究人员没有提供有关所使用分析方法的验证信息,无论是来自供应商还是通过自己的努力,那么必须对从这些分析方法中获得的数据提出质疑。最近在临床环境中测定血清松弛素的许多研究论文已经发表。用于这种测定的分析方法各不相同,但通常是两种市售分析方法之一。本文将讨论这些手稿和所使用的分析方法。目前缺乏对分析方法的直接比较,但通过比较使用不同分析方法的类似研究的结果,可以得出一些一般性结论。不同分析方法测定的血清松弛素浓度结果存在差异,这引发了对分析方法可靠性的质疑。用于检测血清松弛素的免疫分析方法的质量差异应成为选择分析方法决策过程的一部分。虽然最终用户有责任证明所使用的分析方法对其声明的要求是有效的,但评审员和编辑也对发表结果的质量负有责任。