Department of Hematology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, No. 188. Shi Zi Street, Suzhou, 215006, China.
Jiangsu Institute of Hematology, Key Laboratory of Thrombosis and Hemostasis of the Ministry of Health, Suzhou, Jiangsu, China.
Ann Hematol. 2019 May;98(5):1259-1266. doi: 10.1007/s00277-018-3576-2. Epub 2019 Jan 12.
The aim of this study is to determine whether the modified BuCy (semustine, cytarabine, busulfan, and cyclophosphamide, mBuCy) conditioning regimen can be safely used as an alternative to the SEAM (semustine, etoposide, cytarabine, and melphalan) regimen by comparing the efficacy and toxicity of the mBuCy and SEAM regimens. We matched 34 pairs of patients with regard to disease status at the time of autologous stem cell transplantation (auto-SCT). We found no significant difference in the time of platelet engraftment between the two groups. Furthermore, neutrophil engraftment was somewhat faster in the mBuCy group than in the SEAM group (median: 9 days vs 10 days, p = 0.015). With regard to toxicity, the incidence of nausea/vomiting, hepatic impairment, renal impairment, pulmonary infection, and treatment-related mortality (TRM) was similar between the two groups. In addition, compared to patients conditioned with SEAM, patients conditioned with mBuCy were less likely to develop mucositis and diarrhea (p = 0.027; p = 0.050). The 2-year progression-free survival (PFS) rates in the mBuCy and SEAM groups were 79% and 70% (p = 0.378), respectively, and the 2-year overall survival (OS) rates were 81% and 78.0%, respectively (p = 0.789). These analyses showed that the mBuCy conditioning regimen was well tolerated and can be used as an alternative to the SEAM regimen for lymphoma.
本研究旨在通过比较 mBuCy 和 SEAM 方案的疗效和毒性,确定改良 BuCy(马法兰、阿糖胞苷、白消安和环磷酰胺,mBuCy)预处理方案是否可作为 SEAM 方案的替代方案安全使用。我们根据自体干细胞移植(auto-SCT)时疾病状态对 34 对患者进行了匹配。我们发现两组患者血小板植入的时间无显著差异。此外,mBuCy 组的中性粒细胞植入速度比 SEAM 组稍快(中位数:9 天比 10 天,p=0.015)。关于毒性,两组恶心/呕吐、肝损伤、肾损伤、肺部感染和治疗相关死亡率(TRM)的发生率相似。此外,与 SEAM 预处理的患者相比,mBuCy 预处理的患者发生黏膜炎和腹泻的可能性较低(p=0.027;p=0.050)。mBuCy 和 SEAM 组的 2 年无进展生存率(PFS)分别为 79%和 70%(p=0.378),2 年总生存率(OS)分别为 81%和 78.0%(p=0.789)。这些分析表明,mBuCy 预处理方案耐受性良好,可作为淋巴瘤患者 SEAM 方案的替代方案。