• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

肾盂直径和泌尿道扩张分级在预测泌尿道异常中的价值。

Value of renal pelvic diameter and urinary tract dilation classification in the prediction of urinary tract anomaly.

作者信息

Cakici Evrim Kargin, Aydog Ozlem, Eroglu Fehime Kara, Yazilitas Fatma, Ozlu Sare Gulfem, Uner Cigdem, Renda Rahime, Yılmaz Engin, Bulbul Mehmet

机构信息

Department of Pediatric Nephrology, Dr Sami Ulus Maternity and Child Health and Diseases Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey.

Department of Pediatric Nephrology, 19 Mayis University Medical School, Samsun, Turkey.

出版信息

Pediatr Int. 2019 Mar;61(3):271-277. doi: 10.1111/ped.13788. Epub 2019 Mar 18.

DOI:10.1111/ped.13788
PMID:30636381
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to identify the cut-offs of postnatal anteroposterior renal pelvic diameter (APRPD), according to the urinary tract dilation (UTD) classification system, to identify the predictors of final diagnosis of UTD and the need for surgery.

METHODS

A total of 260 infants (336 renal units) with prenatally detected UTD were prospectively evaluated on serial ultrasonography by the same radiologist. Additional voiding cystourethrography and scintigraphy was done according to the clinical algorithm.

RESULTS

Prenatal and postnatal APRPD in patients with transient dilation were significantly lower than in those with urinary tract anomalies (UTA). On follow up, the slope of decrease in APRPD was significantly higher in transient dilation compared with UTA. APRPD 10 mm at first-month ultrasonography, predicted UTA with a sensitivity of 83.1%, and specificity of 71.1%. On multivariate analysis the likelihood of surgical intervention and final diagnosis were predicted independently by the UTD system risk group.

CONCLUSIONS

Careful ultrasonography evaluation can avoid unnecessary testing in patients with transient or clinically insignificant dilation. The UTD classification system is valid for evaluation of postnatal hydronephrosis and is reliable in predicting the need for surgical intervention.

摘要

背景

本研究的目的是根据泌尿道扩张(UTD)分类系统确定出生后肾盂前后径(APRPD)的临界值,以确定UTD最终诊断的预测因素及手术需求。

方法

对260例产前检测出UTD的婴儿(336个肾单位)由同一位放射科医生进行系列超声检查的前瞻性评估。根据临床方案进行额外的排尿性膀胱尿道造影和闪烁扫描。

结果

短暂扩张患者的产前和产后APRPD显著低于尿路异常(UTA)患者。随访时,短暂扩张患者APRPD的下降斜率显著高于UTA患者。出生后第一个月超声检查时APRPD为10 mm,预测UTA的敏感性为83.1%,特异性为71.1%。多因素分析显示,UTD系统风险组可独立预测手术干预的可能性和最终诊断。

结论

仔细的超声检查评估可避免对短暂性或临床意义不显著的扩张患者进行不必要的检查。UTD分类系统对评估出生后肾积水有效,且在预测手术干预需求方面可靠。

相似文献

1
Value of renal pelvic diameter and urinary tract dilation classification in the prediction of urinary tract anomaly.肾盂直径和泌尿道扩张分级在预测泌尿道异常中的价值。
Pediatr Int. 2019 Mar;61(3):271-277. doi: 10.1111/ped.13788. Epub 2019 Mar 18.
2
The antenatal urinary tract dilation classification system accurately predicts severity of kidney and urinary tract abnormalities.产前泌尿道扩张分类系统能准确预测肾脏和泌尿道异常的严重程度。
J Pediatr Urol. 2017 Oct;13(5):485.e1-485.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2017.03.020. Epub 2017 Apr 21.
3
Rater reliability of postnatal urinary tract dilation consensus classification.产后泌尿道扩张共识分类的评估者信度
Pediatr Radiol. 2018 Oct;48(11):1606-1611. doi: 10.1007/s00247-018-4173-1. Epub 2018 Jun 20.
4
Frequency and prediction of persistent urinary tract dilation in third trimester and postnatal urinary tract dilation in infants following diagnosis in second trimester.在婴儿出生后,对妊娠中期确诊的婴儿进行随访,观察其第三孕期持续性尿路扩张和产后尿路扩张的频率和预测因素。
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2022 Apr;59(4):522-531. doi: 10.1002/uog.23758.
5
Multidisciplinary consensus on the classification of prenatal and postnatal urinary tract dilation (UTD classification system).产前和产后泌尿道扩张分类的多学科共识(UTD分类系统)。
J Pediatr Urol. 2014 Dec;10(6):982-98. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2014.10.002. Epub 2014 Nov 15.
6
The association of postnatal urinary tract dilation risk score with clinical outcomes.产后尿路扩张风险评分与临床结局的关系。
J Pediatr Urol. 2019 Aug;15(4):341.e1-341.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2019.05.001. Epub 2019 May 9.
7
Diagnostic accuracy of renal pelvic dilatation for detecting surgically managed ureteropelvic junction obstruction.肾盂扩张对手术治疗的肾盂输尿管连接部梗阻的诊断准确性。
J Urol. 2013 Aug;190(2):661-6. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2013.02.014. Epub 2013 Feb 14.
8
Society for Fetal Urology Classification vs Urinary Tract Dilation Grading System for Prognostication in Prenatal Hydronephrosis: A Time to Resolution Analysis.胎儿泌尿外科学会分类与产前肾积水预测的尿路扩张分级系统:解决时间分析。
J Urol. 2018 Jun;199(6):1615-1621. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2017.11.077. Epub 2017 Dec 2.
9
Validation of "urinary tract dilation" classification system: Correlation between fetal hydronephrosis and postnatal urological abnormalities.“泌尿道扩张”分类系统的验证:胎儿肾积水与出生后泌尿系统异常之间的相关性。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2020 Jan;99(2):e18707. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000018707.
10
Associations, follow up data, and postnatal outcome of antenatally diagnosed Urinary Tract Dilatation - Five-year single tertiary center experience from South India.印度南部单中心 5 年经验:产前诊断的尿路扩张的相关性、随访数据及产后结局。
J Pediatr Urol. 2023 Feb;19(1):89.e1-89.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2022.10.028. Epub 2022 Oct 28.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparison of urinary tract dilation and society for fetal urology classifications in predicting indication and success of pyeloplasty in ureteropelvic junction obstruction.在预测肾盂输尿管连接部梗阻肾盂成形术的指征和成功率方面,比较尿路扩张与胎儿泌尿外科学会的分类。
Int Urol Nephrol. 2025 May 24. doi: 10.1007/s11255-025-04578-z.
2
Urinary tract dilation classification system for predicting surgical management and urinary tract infection in neonates and young infants: a systematic review and meta-analysis.用于预测新生儿和婴幼儿手术管理和尿路感染的尿路扩张分类系统:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Pediatr Radiol. 2024 May;54(5):795-804. doi: 10.1007/s00247-024-05854-3. Epub 2024 Jan 29.
3
Functional Magnetic Resonance Urography in Ureteropelvic Junction Obstruction: Proposal for a Pediatric Quantitative Score.
输尿管肾盂连接处梗阻的功能磁共振尿路造影:小儿定量评分方案
Front Pediatr. 2022 Jun 16;10:882892. doi: 10.3389/fped.2022.882892. eCollection 2022.