Department of Anesthesiology, Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiaotong University, Shanghai, 200127, China.
BMC Anesthesiol. 2019 Jan 12;19(1):11. doi: 10.1186/s12871-018-0679-1.
Anticoagulant therapy during pregnancy is widely used due to the increasing awareness of maternal hypercoagulability. Few studies have reported the use of minimally invasive spinal anesthesia in these parturients. The objective of this study was to evaluate the safety and feasibility of minimally invasive spinal anesthesia in parturients with anticoagulation therapy undergoing cesarean section.
This was a randomized, controlled study conducted in 239 parturients using anticoagulants and undergoing selective cesarean section. 37 parturients withdrew, and finally parturients received spinal anesthesia using 27gauge pen type fine spinal needles (experimental group, n = 110) and 22gauge traditional spinal needles (control group, n = 92). The primary efficacy outcomes included low back pain (LBP) and postdural puncture headache (PDPH) after delivery. Secondary efficacy outcomes included visual analogue scale during subarachnoid puncture (VASdural), difference between visual analogue scale (VAS) during peripheral venipuncture and VASdural (∆VAS), VAS of back puncture point 24, 48 and 72 h after operation (VASdural-24 h, VASdural-48 h and VASdural-72 h, respectively), maternal satisfaction and hospitalization stay.
No parturient had PDPH and was suspected with spinal or intracranial haematoma in two groups. There was no significant difference in VASlbp-24 h, VASlbp-48 h and VASlbp-72 h (P = 0.056; P = 0.813; P = 0.189, respectively) between two groups. In experimental group, VASdural (P = 0.017), ∆VAS (P = 0.001) and VASdural-24 h (P < 0.0001) were lower, whereas maternal satisfaction was higher (P = 0.046). There was no significant difference in VASdural-48 h, VASdural-72 h, urination function, strength recovery and hospitalization stay (P = 0.069; P = 0.667; P = 0.105; P = 0.133; P = 0.754, respectively) between the two groups.
Minimally invasive spinal anesthesia provided lower VASdural, VASdrual-24 h and a higher maternal satisfaction. Hence, it is considered as a safe, reliable and reasonable option for cesarean section parturients during maternal anticoagulation therapy with normal platelet count and coagulation time.
This study was registered at www.ClinicalTrials.gov at November 11th, 2016 ( NCT02987192 ).
由于对孕产妇高凝状态认识的提高,抗凝治疗在妊娠期间广泛应用。很少有研究报道在这些产妇中使用微创性椎管内麻醉。本研究的目的是评估在接受剖宫产的抗凝治疗产妇中使用微创性椎管内麻醉的安全性和可行性。
这是一项在使用抗凝剂并选择性行剖宫产的 239 名产妇中进行的随机对照研究。37 名产妇退出,最终 110 名产妇使用 27G 笔式细针(实验组)和 92 名产妇使用 22G 传统针进行脊髓麻醉。主要疗效指标包括分娩后腰痛(LBP)和硬脊膜穿剌后头痛(PDPH)。次要疗效指标包括蛛网膜下腔穿剌时的视觉模拟评分(VASdural)、外周静脉穿剌时的视觉模拟评分(VAS)与 VASdural 的差值(∆VAS)、术后 24、48 和 72 小时时的背部穿刺点的视觉模拟评分(VASdural-24h、VASdural-48h 和 VASdural-72h)、产妇满意度和住院时间。
两组均未发生 PDPH,也未怀疑有脊髓或颅内血肿。两组间 24 小时(VASlbp-24h)、48 小时(VASlbp-48h)和 72 小时(VASlbp-72h)的 VASlbp 无显著差异(P=0.056;P=0.813;P=0.189,分别)。实验组 VASdural(P=0.017)、∆VAS(P=0.001)和 VASdural-24h(P<0.0001)较低,而产妇满意度较高(P=0.046)。两组间 48 小时(VASdural-48h)、72 小时(VASdural-72h)、排尿功能、肌力恢复和住院时间无显著差异(P=0.069;P=0.667;P=0.105;P=0.133;P=0.754,分别)。
微创性椎管内麻醉可降低 VASdural、VASdural-24h,提高产妇满意度。因此,对于血小板计数和凝血时间正常的接受抗凝治疗的产妇,微创性椎管内麻醉被认为是一种安全、可靠和合理的剖宫产选择。
本研究于 2016 年 11 月 11 日在 www.ClinicalTrials.gov 注册(NCT02987192)。