Calculate Patient-Reported Scores as Recommended so as Not to Threaten the Validity of the Measure: Letter to the Editor.
作者信息
Roos Ewa M
机构信息
Odense, Denmark.
出版信息
Orthop J Sports Med. 2018 Dec 31;6(12):2325967118816987. doi: 10.1177/2325967118816987. eCollection 2018 Dec.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Calculate Patient-Reported Scores as Recommended so as Not to Threaten the Validity of the Measure: Letter to the Editor.按照建议计算患者报告的分数，以免影响测量的有效性：致编辑的信。
Orthop J Sports Med. 2018 Dec 31;6(12):2325967118816987. doi: 10.1177/2325967118816987. eCollection 2018 Dec.
2
Calculate Patient-Reported Scores as Recommended so as Not to Threaten the Validity of the Measure: Response.按照建议计算患者报告的分数，以免影响测量的有效性：回应。
Orthop J Sports Med. 2018 Dec 31;6(12):2325967118816988. doi: 10.1177/2325967118816988. eCollection 2018 Dec.
3
Regression to Middle Effect May Threaten Validity of Triage Scales; a Letter to Editor.向中间效应的回归可能会威胁分诊量表的有效性；致编辑的一封信。
Emerg (Tehran). 2018;6(1):e60. Epub 2018 Nov 18.
4
Validity Evidence for a Residency Admissions Standardized Assessment Letter for Pediatrics.儿科住院医师招生标准化评估信的效度证据。
Teach Learn Med. 2018 Apr-Jun;30(2):173-183. doi: 10.1080/10401334.2017.1367297. Epub 2017 Nov 30.
5
Letter to Editor. New assessment of the validity of the Brief Measure to Assess Perception of Self-Influence on the Disease Course: A Version for Schizophrenia.致编辑的信。对《评估自我对疾病进程影响感知的简短量表：精神分裂症版本》有效性的新评估。
Psychiatr Pol. 2015 May-Jun;49(3):649-52. doi: 10.12740/PP/43441.
6
Confusing confusability: on the problems of using psychophysical measures of letter confusability in neuropsychological research.混淆的易混淆性：论神经心理学研究中使用字母易混淆性心理物理学测量方法的问题。
Cogn Neuropsychol. 2015;32(5):314-20. doi: 10.1080/02643294.2015.1061488. Epub 2015 Jul 13.
7
Letter to editor regarding "Hosbay et al. Reliability and validity of the Brachial Plexus Outcome Measure in children with obstetric brachial plexus palsy. J Hand Ther. 2019 32(3):382-87".致编辑的信，关于“Hosbay等人。产科臂丛神经麻痹患儿臂丛神经功能结果测量的可靠性和有效性。《手治疗杂志》。2019年，32(3):382 - 87”
J Hand Ther. 2020 Oct-Dec;33(4):e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jht.2019.12.017. Epub 2020 Mar 9.
8
Authors' response to letter to the editor, letter to the editor: Authors' response to letter to the editor: Safety concerns with human papilloma virus immunization in Japan: Analysis and evaluation of Nagoya City's surveillance data for adverse events.作者对编辑来信的回复，编辑来信：作者对编辑来信的回复：日本人类乳头瘤病毒免疫接种的安全性问题：名古屋市不良事件监测数据的分析与评估
Jpn J Nurs Sci. 2020 Jan;17(1):e12310. doi: 10.1111/jjns.12310. Epub 2019 Dec 2.
9
Response to Letter to editor about the article "Hosbay et al. Reliability and validity of the brachial plexus outcome measure in children with obstetric brachial plexus palsy". J Hand Ther. 2019 32(3):382-387.对致编辑的信的回复，该信是关于文章《霍斯贝等人：产科臂丛神经麻痹患儿臂丛神经结局测量的可靠性和有效性》。《手治疗杂志》。2019年 第32卷第3期：382 - 387页
J Hand Ther. 2021 Jul-Sep;34(3):e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jht.2020.03.016. Epub 2020 Jun 19.
10
How to write an editorial letter?如何撰写编辑信函？
Turk J Urol. 2013 Sep;39(Suppl 1):41-3. doi: 10.5152/tud.2013.053.
本文引用的文献
1
Comparison of 3 Knee-Specific Quality-of-Life Instruments for Patients With Meniscal Tears.三种针对半月板撕裂患者的膝关节特定生活质量评估工具的比较。
Orthop J Sports Med. 2018 Jan 12;6(1):2325967117750082. doi: 10.1177/2325967117750082. eCollection 2018 Jan.
2
3 steps to improve reporting and interpretation of patient-reported outcome scores in orthopedic studies.改善骨科研究中患者报告结局评分报告与解读的三个步骤。
Acta Orthop. 2018 Feb;89(1):1-2. doi: 10.1080/17453674.2017.1407058. Epub 2017 Nov 27.
3
Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS): systematic review and meta-analysis of measurement properties.膝关节损伤和骨关节炎结局评分（KOOS）：测量特性的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2016 Aug;24(8):1317-29. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2016.03.010. Epub 2016 Mar 21.
Zotero 插件