• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Alternating Thalamic Deep Brain Stimulation for Essential Tremor: A Trial to Reduce Habituation.交替丘脑深部脑刺激治疗特发性震颤:一项减少适应性的试验。
Mov Disord Clin Pract. 2018 Nov 9;5(6):620-626. doi: 10.1002/mdc3.12685. eCollection 2018 Nov-Dec.
2
Safety and efficacy of dual-lead thalamic deep brain stimulation for patients with treatment-refractory multiple sclerosis tremor: a single-centre, randomised, single-blind, pilot trial.双侧丘脑深部脑刺激治疗难治性多发性硬化震颤的安全性和有效性:单中心、随机、单盲、初步试验。
Lancet Neurol. 2017 Sep;16(9):691-700. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(17)30166-7. Epub 2017 Jun 20.
3
One Pass Thalamic and Subthalamic Stimulation for Patients with Tremor-Dominant Idiopathic Parkinson Syndrome (OPINION): Protocol for a Randomized, Active-Controlled, Double-Blinded Pilot Trial.单通道丘脑和丘脑底核刺激治疗震颤为主型特发性帕金森综合征患者(OPINION):一项随机、活性对照、双盲试点试验的方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2018 Jan 30;7(1):e36. doi: 10.2196/resprot.8341.
4
Deep brain stimulation in the nucleus ventralis intermedius in patients with essential tremor: habituation of tremor suppression.中脑腹侧中间核深部脑刺激治疗特发性震颤:震颤抑制的习惯化。
J Neurol. 2011 Mar;258(3):434-9. doi: 10.1007/s00415-010-5773-3. Epub 2010 Oct 8.
5
The effect of unilateral thalamic deep brain stimulation on the vocal dysfunction in a patient with spasmodic dysphonia: interrogating cerebellar and pallidal neural circuits.单侧丘脑深部脑刺激对痉挛性发声障碍患者发声障碍的影响:小脑和苍白球神经回路的探讨。
J Neurosurg. 2018 Feb;128(2):575-582. doi: 10.3171/2016.10.JNS161025. Epub 2017 Mar 17.
6
Thalamic DBS with a constant-current device in essential tremor: A controlled clinical trial.使用恒流装置进行丘脑深部脑刺激治疗特发性震颤:一项对照临床试验。
Parkinsonism Relat Disord. 2017 Jul;40:18-26. doi: 10.1016/j.parkreldis.2017.03.017. Epub 2017 Mar 30.
7
Repeated group alternation as a programming strategy for essential tremor patients experiencing rapid habituation with deep brain stimulation treatment.重复组交替作为一种编程策略,用于接受脑深部电刺激治疗且快速出现习惯化的特发性震颤患者。
Int J Neurosci. 2021 Aug;131(8):828-832. doi: 10.1080/00207454.2020.1758083. Epub 2020 May 25.
8
Habituation and rebound to thalamic deep brain stimulation in long-term management of tremor associated with demyelinating neuropathy.丘脑深部脑刺激的习惯化和反弹在与脱髓鞘性神经病相关震颤的长期管理中的作用
Int J Neurosci. 2014 Dec;124(12):919-25. doi: 10.3109/00207454.2014.895345. Epub 2014 Apr 2.
9
Longitudinal follow-up with VIM thalamic deep brain stimulation for dystonic or essential tremor.采用 VIM 丘脑深部电刺激进行痉挛性或特发性震颤的纵向随访。
Neurology. 2020 Mar 10;94(10):e1073-e1084. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000008875. Epub 2020 Feb 11.
10
Deep brain stimulation of the VIM thalamic nucleus modifies several features of essential tremor.丘脑腹中间核的深部脑刺激可改变特发性震颤的若干特征。
Neurology. 2003 Oct 14;61(7):919-25. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000086371.78447.d2.

引用本文的文献

1
Bilateral Focused Ultrasound Thalamotomy for Essential Tremor: Clinical Outcomes Compared to Bilateral Deep Brain Stimulation and Probabilistic Lesion Mapping.双侧聚焦超声丘脑切开术治疗特发性震颤:与双侧脑深部电刺激及概率性病变图谱绘制的临床结果比较
Mov Disord. 2025 Jul;40(7):1265-1278. doi: 10.1002/mds.30221. Epub 2025 May 2.
2
Intracranial self-stimulation reverses impaired spatial learning and regulates serum microRNA levels in a streptozotocin-induced rat model of Alzheimer disease.颅内自我刺激可逆转阿尔茨海默病链脲佐菌素诱导的大鼠模型的空间学习障碍,并调节血清 microRNA 水平。
J Psychiatry Neurosci. 2024 Mar 15;49(2):E96-E108. doi: 10.1503/jpn.230066. Print 2024 Jan-Feb.
3
Management of essential tremor deep brain stimulation-induced side effects.特发性震颤深部脑刺激引起的副作用的管理。
Front Hum Neurosci. 2024 Feb 22;18:1353150. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2024.1353150. eCollection 2024.
4
Proceedings of the Ninth Annual Deep Brain Stimulation Think Tank: Advances in Cutting Edge Technologies, Artificial Intelligence, Neuromodulation, Neuroethics, Pain, Interventional Psychiatry, Epilepsy, and Traumatic Brain Injury.第九届年度深部脑刺激智囊团会议论文集:前沿技术、人工智能、神经调节、神经伦理、疼痛、介入精神病学、癫痫和创伤性脑损伤的进展
Front Hum Neurosci. 2022 Mar 4;16:813387. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2022.813387. eCollection 2022.
5
Essential Tremor-Do We Have Better Therapeutics? A Review of Recent Advances and Future Directions.特发性震颤——我们有更好的治疗方法吗?对近期进展和未来方向的综述。
Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep. 2022 Mar;22(3):197-208. doi: 10.1007/s11910-022-01185-8. Epub 2022 Mar 2.
6
Temporary Stimulation Switch-off Successfully Applied in a Dystonic Camptocormia Patient.临时刺激关闭成功应用于一名肌张力障碍性弯腰驼背患者。
Mov Disord Clin Pract. 2022 Jan 3;9(2):255-258. doi: 10.1002/mdc3.13397. eCollection 2022 Feb.
7
Deep Brain Stimulation for Tremor: Update on Long-Term Outcomes, Target Considerations and Future Directions.用于震颤的深部脑刺激:长期疗效、靶点考量及未来方向的最新进展
J Clin Med. 2021 Aug 5;10(16):3468. doi: 10.3390/jcm10163468.
8
Habituation After Deep Brain Stimulation in Tremor Syndromes: Prevalence, Risk Factors and Long-Term Outcomes.震颤综合征深部脑刺激后的习惯化:患病率、危险因素及长期预后
Front Neurol. 2021 Aug 3;12:696950. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2021.696950. eCollection 2021.
9
Deep-Brain Stimulation for Essential Tremor and Other Tremor Syndromes: A Narrative Review of Current Targets and Clinical Outcomes.深部脑刺激治疗特发性震颤和其他震颤综合征:当前靶点及临床结果的叙述性综述
Brain Sci. 2020 Dec 1;10(12):925. doi: 10.3390/brainsci10120925.
10
Optimal Parameters of Deep Brain Stimulation in Essential Tremor: A Meta-Analysis and Novel Programming Strategy.特发性震颤中脑深部电刺激的最佳参数:一项荟萃分析及新型程控策略
J Clin Med. 2020 Jun 14;9(6):1855. doi: 10.3390/jcm9061855.

本文引用的文献

1
Recent advances in Essential Tremor: Surgical treatment.特发性震颤的最新进展:外科治疗
Parkinsonism Relat Disord. 2016 Jan;22 Suppl 1:S171-5. doi: 10.1016/j.parkreldis.2015.09.012. Epub 2015 Sep 7.
2
Deep brain stimulation for movement disorders: 2015 and beyond.用于运动障碍的深部脑刺激:2015年及以后。
Curr Opin Neurol. 2015 Aug;28(4):423-36. doi: 10.1097/WCO.0000000000000226.
3
Utilization of predefined stimulation groups by essential tremor patients treated with VIM-DBS.接受丘脑腹中间核深部脑刺激(VIM-DBS)治疗的特发性震颤患者对预定义刺激组的利用情况。
Parkinsonism Relat Disord. 2014 Dec;20(12):1415-8. doi: 10.1016/j.parkreldis.2014.09.021. Epub 2014 Sep 28.
4
Alcohol challenge and sensitivity to change of the Essential Tremor Rating Assessment Scale.酒精激发试验与特发性震颤评定量表对变化的敏感性
Mov Disord. 2014 Apr;29(4):555-8. doi: 10.1002/mds.25667. Epub 2013 Oct 7.
5
The safety and efficacy of thalamic deep brain stimulation in essential tremor: 10 years and beyond.丘脑深部脑刺激治疗原发性震颤的安全性和有效性:10 年及以上。
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2014 May;85(5):567-72. doi: 10.1136/jnnp-2013-304943. Epub 2013 Oct 4.
6
Loss of benefit in VIM thalamic deep brain stimulation (DBS) for essential tremor (ET): how prevalent is it?丘脑底核(VIM)深部脑刺激(DBS)治疗原发性震颤(ET)获益丧失:有多常见?
Parkinsonism Relat Disord. 2013 Jul;19(7):676-9. doi: 10.1016/j.parkreldis.2013.03.006. Epub 2013 Apr 11.
7
On-demand control system for deep brain stimulation for treatment of intention tremor.按需控制系统,用于深部脑刺激治疗意向性震颤。
Neuromodulation. 2013 May-Jun;16(3):230-5; discussion 235. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1403.2012.00521.x. Epub 2012 Oct 24.
8
Deep brain stimulation in the nucleus ventralis intermedius in patients with essential tremor: habituation of tremor suppression.中脑腹侧中间核深部脑刺激治疗特发性震颤:震颤抑制的习惯化。
J Neurol. 2011 Mar;258(3):434-9. doi: 10.1007/s00415-010-5773-3. Epub 2010 Oct 8.
9
How common is the most common adult movement disorder? Update on the worldwide prevalence of essential tremor.最常见的成人运动障碍有多常见?特发性震颤全球患病率的最新更新。
Mov Disord. 2010 Apr 15;25(5):534-41. doi: 10.1002/mds.22838.
10
Long-term results of thalamic deep brain stimulation for essential tremor.丘脑深部电刺激治疗原发性震颤的长期疗效。
J Neurosurg. 2010 Jun;112(6):1271-6. doi: 10.3171/2009.10.JNS09371.

交替丘脑深部脑刺激治疗特发性震颤:一项减少适应性的试验。

Alternating Thalamic Deep Brain Stimulation for Essential Tremor: A Trial to Reduce Habituation.

作者信息

Seier Mara, Hiller Amie, Quinn Joseph, Murchison Charles, Brodsky Matthew, Anderson Shannon

机构信息

Department of Neurological Sciences University of Nebraska Medical Center Omaha Nebraska USA.

Northwest Parkinson Disease Research Education and Clinical Center, Portland VA Medical Center Portland Oregon USA.

出版信息

Mov Disord Clin Pract. 2018 Nov 9;5(6):620-626. doi: 10.1002/mdc3.12685. eCollection 2018 Nov-Dec.

DOI:10.1002/mdc3.12685
PMID:30637283
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6277363/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

DBS in the ventral intermediate nucleus (VIM) of the thalamus has been a revolutionary treatment for patients with essential tremor (ET) by reducing tremor. Unfortunately, some patients develop habituation to DBS and thus experience reduced efficacy and loss of tremor control. There are no standardized methods of addressing habituation to DBS. We propose alternating stimulation patterns as a way to reduce habituation.

METHODS

This was a randomized, placebo-controlled trial for patients with VIM DBS for ET. Patients were randomized to either experimental treatment arm of alternating stimulation patterns on a weekly basis or standard care arm of continuous stimulation settings for 12 weeks. Primary outcome was change in the performance subscale of The Essential Tremor Rating Assessment Scale (TETRAS), which was performed at initial visit and 12-week follow-up. Secondary outcome included change in the activities of daily living subscale of TETRAS.

RESULTS

Twenty-two patients were enrolled in the trial, and 16 were analyzed at follow-up. Experimental treatment subjects displayed sustained tremor control compared to standard care, as measured by the change in TETRAS performance subscale (-0.6 vs. 6.7 point change, respectively) with a 7.3 difference between the arms ( = 0.006).

CONCLUSION

Alternating stimulation patterns on a weekly basis for ET patients with VIM DBS reduced habituation in this pilot study. This study suggests that exposure to different stimulation groups may maintain better tremor control compared to constant stimulation parameters.

摘要

背景

丘脑腹中间核(VIM)的深部脑刺激(DBS)通过减轻震颤,已成为特发性震颤(ET)患者的一种革命性治疗方法。不幸的是,一些患者会对DBS产生适应性,从而导致疗效降低和震颤控制丧失。目前尚无针对DBS适应性的标准化解决方法。我们提出交替刺激模式作为一种减少适应性的方法。

方法

这是一项针对接受VIM-DBS治疗ET患者的随机、安慰剂对照试验。患者被随机分为每周交替刺激模式的实验治疗组或持续刺激设置的标准护理组,为期12周。主要结局是特发性震颤评分评估量表(TETRAS)中表现子量表的变化,在初次就诊时和12周随访时进行评估。次要结局包括TETRAS日常生活活动子量表的变化。

结果

22名患者入组该试验,16名患者在随访时进行分析。通过TETRAS表现子量表的变化测量(分别为-0.6与6.7分的变化),实验治疗组受试者与标准护理组相比显示出持续的震颤控制,两组之间差异为7.3(P = 0.006)。

结论

在这项初步研究中,对于接受VIM-DBS的ET患者,每周交替刺激模式可减少适应性。该研究表明,与恒定刺激参数相比,暴露于不同刺激组可能维持更好的震颤控制。