Suppr超能文献

肿瘤坏死因子抑制剂治疗甲氨蝶呤初治类风湿关节炎的长期疗效:系统文献回顾和荟萃分析。

Long-Term Efficacy of Tumor Necrosis Factor Inhibitors for the Treatment of Methotrexate-Naïve Rheumatoid Arthritis: Systematic Literature Review and Meta-Analysis.

机构信息

Department of Health Economics, Corvinus University of Budapest, Budapest, Hungary.

Doctoral School of Business and Management, Corvinus University of Budapest, Budapest, Hungary.

出版信息

Adv Ther. 2019 Mar;36(3):721-745. doi: 10.1007/s12325-018-0869-8. Epub 2019 Jan 12.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Synthesis of evidence on the long-term use of first-line biologic therapy in patients with early rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is required. We compared the efficacy of up to 5 years' treatment with first-line tumor necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFis) versus other treatment strategies in this population.

METHODS

Previous systematic reviews, PubMed and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) involving treatment of methotrexate-naïve RA patients with first-line TNFis. Literature was synthesized qualitatively, and a meta-analysis conducted to evaluate American College of Rheumatology (ACR) responses, clinical remission defined by any standard measure, and Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ) at Years 2 and/or 5.

RESULTS

Ten RCTs involving 4306 patients [first-line TNFi, n = 2234; other treatment strategies (control), n = 2072] were included in the meta-analysis. Three studies were double-blind for the first 2 years, while seven were partly/completely open label during this period. Five studies reported data at Year 5; all were open label at this time point. At Year 2, ACR50 response, ACR70 response and remission rates were significantly improved with first-line TNFi versus control in double-blind RCTs [log-odds ratio (OR) 0.32 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.02, 0.62; p = 0.035], log-OR 0.48 (95% CI 0.20, 0.77; p = 0.001), and log-OR 0.44 (95% CI 0.13, 0.74; p = 0.005), respectively], but not in open-label studies. No significant between-group differences were observed in mean HAQ at Year 2 in double-blind or open-label RCTs or in ACR response or remission outcomes at Year 5.

CONCLUSION

In double-blind studies, 2-year efficacy outcomes were significantly improved with first-line TNFi versus other treatment strategies in patients with MTX-naïve RA. No significant differences in these outcomes were observed when data from open-label RCTs were considered on their own. Further data on the efficacy of TNFi therapy over ≥ 2 years in patients with methotrexate-naïve RA are required. Plain language summary available for this article.

摘要

简介

需要综合早期类风湿关节炎(RA)患者一线生物制剂长期使用的证据。我们比较了在该人群中,使用一线肿瘤坏死因子抑制剂(TNFis)长达 5 年的治疗效果与其他治疗策略的疗效。

方法

检索了之前的系统评价、PubMed 和 Cochrane 对照试验中心注册库,以寻找涉及甲氨蝶呤初治 RA 患者一线 TNFis 治疗的随机对照试验(RCT)。对文献进行定性综合,并进行荟萃分析,以评估美国风湿病学会(ACR)反应、任何标准衡量的临床缓解和健康评估问卷残疾指数(HAQ)在第 2 年和/或第 5 年的情况。

结果

纳入了 10 项 RCT,共 4306 名患者[一线 TNFi,n=2234;其他治疗策略(对照),n=2072]。其中 3 项研究在前 2 年为双盲,而在此期间,7 项研究为部分/完全开放标签。5 项研究报告了第 5 年的数据;此时所有研究均为开放标签。在第 2 年,与对照组相比,一线 TNFi 可显著提高 ACR50 反应、ACR70 反应和缓解率[双盲 RCT 的对数优势比(OR)为 0.32(95%置信区间[CI],0.02,0.62;p=0.035]、OR 0.48(95%CI,0.20,0.77;p=0.001)和 OR 0.44(95%CI,0.13,0.74;p=0.005)],但在开放标签研究中并未观察到显著差异。在双盲或开放标签 RCT 中,第 2 年的平均 HAQ 或第 5 年的 ACR 反应或缓解结果无组间差异。

结论

在双盲研究中,与其他治疗策略相比,一线 TNFi 可显著提高甲氨蝶呤初治 RA 患者的 2 年疗效。单独考虑开放标签 RCT 的数据时,未观察到这些结果有显著差异。需要进一步评估甲氨蝶呤初治 RA 患者使用 TNFis 治疗>2 年的疗效。本文提供了通俗易懂的概要。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验