Suppr超能文献

脑胎盘比率的可重复性和再现性评估。

Assessment of reproducibility and repeatability of cerebro-placental ratio.

作者信息

Bhide Amarnath, Badade Anirudh, Khatal Kalpesh

机构信息

Fetal Medicine Unit, St. George's Hospital, London, United Kingdom.

Chikitsa Diagnostic and Ultrasound Training Centre, 6,7 Mahinder Chambers, W T Patil Marg, Chembur, Mumbai, India.

出版信息

Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2019 Apr;235:106-109. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2018.12.027. Epub 2019 Jan 4.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

To test the reproducibility and repeatability of the cerebro-placental ratio.

STUDY DESIGN

Pregnant women with a singleton pregnancy and secure dating were invited to participate after 24 weeks of pregnancy. Using recommended technique, umbilical artery PI was measured from the free loop of the umbilical cord and from the fetal end by one examiner in a state of fetal quiescence, generating four measurements per fetus. Fetal middle cerebral artery PI was also obtained. Cerebro-placental ratio (CPR) was calculated as MCA PI/Umbilical artery PI. Variability of the CPR on the two sampling occasions was tested using Pitman test of equality of variance for related samples. The difference between the two sets of CPR measurements was plotted against the mean to generate 95% limits of agreement.

RESULTS

A total of 158 women were recruited. The mean CPR was significantly lower when the umbilical artery PI was obtained at the para-vesical site, than when it in obtained from a free loop (p < 0.001). No significant correlation was seen between gestational age and CPR, when the umbilical artery PI was measured from the para-vesical site (r = -0.079, p = 0.323) or the free loop (r = -0.103, p = 0.198). Total variance of the CPR using the umbilical artery free loop was 0.286, and that using the para-vesical site of the umbilical artery was 0.164. Pitman's test showed that the total variability of CPR at the two sites was significantly different (r = 0.254, p < 0.001). The variability of CPR was significantly lower if the umbilical artery PI measurement was taken at the fetal end than that in the free loop.

CONCLUSION

The mean CPR site was significantly lower when the umbilical artery PI was obtained at the para-vesical than in the free loop. Measurement site for the umbilical artery PI contributes to a significant proportion to the total variability of the cerebro-placental ratio. CPR measurements should include umbilical artery PI measurements at the para-vesical site rather than the free loop of the umbilical cord in order to improve repeatability. Appropriate reference ranges for the interpretation of CPR will be needed.

摘要

引言

为了测试脑胎盘比值的可重复性和再现性。

研究设计

邀请单胎妊娠且孕周确定的孕妇在妊娠24周后参与研究。采用推荐技术,在胎儿安静状态下,由一名检查者从脐带游离环和胎儿端测量脐动脉搏动指数(PI),每个胎儿获取四次测量值。同时获取胎儿大脑中动脉PI。脑胎盘比值(CPR)计算为大脑中动脉PI/脐动脉PI。使用相关样本的皮特曼方差齐性检验来测试两次采样时CPR的变异性。将两组CPR测量值的差异与均值作图,以生成95%一致性界限。

结果

共招募了158名女性。当在膀胱旁部位获取脐动脉PI时,平均CPR显著低于从脐带游离环获取时(p < 0.001)。当从膀胱旁部位(r = -0.079,p = 0.323)或脐带游离环(r = -0.103,p = 0.198)测量脐动脉PI时,孕周与CPR之间未见显著相关性。使用脐带游离环时CPR的总方差为0.286,使用脐动脉膀胱旁部位时为0.164。皮特曼检验表明,两个部位CPR的总变异性存在显著差异(r = 0.254,p < 0.001)。如果在胎儿端测量脐动脉PI,CPR的变异性显著低于在脐带游离环处测量时。

结论

当在膀胱旁部位获取脐动脉PI时,平均CPR显著低于在脐带游离环处。脐动脉PI的测量部位对脑胎盘比值的总变异性有很大影响。为提高可重复性,CPR测量应包括在膀胱旁部位而非脐带游离环处测量脐动脉PI。需要合适的CPR参考范围用于解读。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验