Dinnoo A, Vacher C, Herman P, Verillaud B
Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Hôpital Lariboisière, Université Paris 7, AP-HP, 2, rue Ambroise-Paré, 75010 Paris, France.
Department of Maxillo-facial surgery, Hôpital Beaujon, Université Paris 7, AP-HP, boulevard du Général-Leclerc, 92110 Clichy, France.
Morphologie. 2019 Mar;103(341):32-36. doi: 10.1016/j.morpho.2018.10.003. Epub 2019 Jan 10.
To assess the gain of exposure provided by extensions of the lateral rhinotomy (LR) incision, including subciliary extension, lip-splitting extension, or both (Weber-Fergusson incision), by comparing the surgical field obtained with every incision. The final goal is to better delineate the indications of each approach.
Prospective study on fresh frozen specimens. A LR incision was first performed, and then extended by subciliary and/or lip-splitting incisions. The exposure of the anterior facial skeleton and of the deep retromaxillar spaces (pterygopalatine fossa and infratemporal fossa) were assessed. The distance between the nasal bone and the most lateral part of the exposure was measured.
Dissection was performed on 4 specimens, with 7 LR. Three LR incisions were extended with subciliary incision, 3 with lip-splitting incision, and 4 with Weber-Fergusson incision. LR incision alone gave only limited access to the lateral orbital rim, the zygomatic arch and the maxillary tuberosity. Both subciliary and lip-splitting incisions gave access to the lateral orbital rim and to the zygomatic arch, but only upper lip incision provided a good access to the maxillary tuberosity. Weber-Fergusson did not significantly increase the surgical field obtained with lip-splitting extension alone. The exposure of the deep retromaxillar spaces was the same in all cases.
LR incision with lip-splitting extension provided an optimal access to the anterior facial skeleton and to the maxillary tuberosity. In terms of exposure, it was equivalent to Weber-Fergusson approach. The exposure of deep spaces was the same regardless of the incision.
