Suppr超能文献

在接受诱导治疗的新发急性髓系白血病患者中,使用不同症状维度识别和稳定症状群的共识。

Consensus in Identification and Stability of Symptom Clusters Using Different Symptom Dimensions in Newly Diagnosed Acute Myeloid Leukemia Patients Undergoing Induction Therapy.

机构信息

School of Nursing, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong Province, China.

The First Affiliated Hospital of Gannan Medical University, Ganzhou, Jiangxi Province, China.

出版信息

J Pain Symptom Manage. 2019 Apr;57(4):783-792. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2018.12.329. Epub 2019 Jan 11.

Abstract

CONTEXT

An unresolved issue in symptom cluster (SC) research is that the numbers and types of SCs vary based on the multiple dimensions of the experienced symptoms that are used for SC identification.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to identify SCs using the ratings of occurrence, severity, and distress in newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients at three stages of their induction therapy (i.e., T1, T2, and T3). Then, we evaluated the consensus among the numbers and types of symptoms in each SC identified by multiple dimensions over time.

METHOD

The Chinese version of the Memorial Symptom Assessment Scale was used to evaluate the occurrence, severity, and distress ratings of 32 symptoms in patients newly diagnosed with AML during their induction therapy. Exploratory factor analysis was used for SCs identification.

RESULTS

Using the three dimensions in the AML patients (n = 126), four SCs were identified at T1 and T3 and three SCs were identified at T2. The number of symptoms in individual SCs varied over time, whereas the specific symptoms in SCs remained similar over time. The severity ratings fit the data better than did the ratings of occurrence and distress.

CONCLUSION

These findings provided insights into the most common SCs in AML patients undergoing induction therapy by multidimensional evaluation and could lay the foundation for future targeted symptom interventions. Further studies are needed to explore the mechanisms of SCs in AML patients undergoing the chemotherapy.

摘要

背景

在症状群(SC)研究中,一个悬而未决的问题是,基于所经历症状的多个维度来识别 SC 时,SC 的数量和类型会有所不同。

目的

本研究旨在使用新诊断为急性髓系白血病(AML)患者在诱导治疗的三个阶段(即 T1、T2 和 T3)的发生、严重程度和困扰程度的评分来识别 SC。然后,我们评估了随着时间的推移,多个维度识别的每个 SC 的症状数量和类型之间的共识。

方法

采用中文版纪念症状评估量表评估诱导治疗期间新诊断为 AML 的患者 32 种症状的发生、严重程度和困扰程度评分。采用探索性因子分析进行 SC 识别。

结果

使用 AML 患者的三个维度(n=126),在 T1 和 T3 时识别出四个 SC,在 T2 时识别出三个 SC。单个 SC 中的症状数量随时间变化,而 SC 中的特定症状随时间保持相似。严重程度评分比发生和困扰评分更符合数据。

结论

这些发现通过多维评估为接受诱导治疗的 AML 患者最常见的 SC 提供了深入了解,并为未来针对症状的干预措施奠定了基础。需要进一步研究来探索 AML 患者化疗过程中 SC 的机制。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验